Neptune City

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of EIK1001 combined with standard treatments in adults with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not previously received vein-based treatment for their advanced disease. This phase 2, open-label, multicenter trial includes participants with confirmed stage 4 squamous or non-squamous NSCLC without mutations suitable for first-line targeted therapy. The study aims to find appropriate dosing and monitor adverse events alongside treatment response. Participants receive EIK1001, a Toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist, together with pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, and chemotherapy drugs such as paclitaxel, pemetrexed, or carboplatin. These treatments are combined as part of the standard care for stage 4 NSCLC. The trial assesses safety and efficacy over the treatment period, including a dose-finding phase to determine the best dose of EIK1001. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including tumor measurements based on RECIST 1.1 criteria, organ function tests, and monitoring of performance status. Researchers track the percentage of participants experiencing safety events throughout up to two years of treatment. Follow-up includes ongoing evaluation of side effects and effectiveness to understand the treatment impact and participant well-being over the course of the trial.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of fixed dose combinations of ensifentrine with two different doses of glycopyrrolate compared to placebo and each drug alone in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This phase IIb study focuses on measuring lung function improvements using bronchodilator effects in people with COPD. Participants have a history of smoking and meet specific lung function criteria to be included. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of six groups: two combination treatments of ensifentrine (3 mg) with glycopyrrolate at either 21.25 or 42.5 mcg, each drug alone as monotherapy, or placebo. All treatments are given twice daily for 28 days using a standard jet nebulizer. The study includes 1 to 2 weeks of screening, 4 weeks of treatment, followed by 1 week of follow-up. During the study, participants will undergo lung function testing at baseline and on days 1, 14, 28, and 29 to measure changes in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). They will also have chest X-rays or CT scans reviewed, complete questionnaires on breathlessness, and have regular assessments to monitor safety and treatment effects. Participants must be able to use the nebulizer properly and attend all study visits over approximately 7 weeks.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy as an additional treatment compared to no stimulation in people with treatment-resistant depression. This prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled, blinded trial focuses on reducing depressive symptoms over 12 months using multiple depression rating scales. The study follows guidelines from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regarding evidence development for this treatment. Participants receive implantation of the VNS device, which delivers stimulation to the vagal nerve. After a minimum two-week period post-implantation, participants are randomly assigned to either active VNS treatment or no stimulation control, with outcomes observed for 12 months. Following this randomized phase, all participants enter an open-label extension where those in the control group receive active stimulation. Additional subjects may join this open-label study for up to five years to further assess long-term effects. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular assessments including the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, Health Outcome Scale, Clinical Global Impressions Scale, and Suicidality Tracking Scale. Researchers monitor response rates, remission times, duration of effects, and adverse events from implantation through 12 months. This comprehensive evaluation includes safety monitoring and functional outcome measures to understand the impact of VNS therapy on depression and related disabilities.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of niraparib compared to temozolomide (TMZ) in adults recently diagnosed with MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). This Phase 3 trial aims to determine if niraparib can improve overall survival compared to the standard treatment with TMZ. The study will enroll 450 participants who have not received prior GBM treatment except surgery or biopsy. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either niraparib or TMZ. Niraparib will be taken orally at 200 mg once daily starting on the first day of radiation therapy (RT) and continued daily during RT for 6-7 weeks, followed by adjuvant niraparib taken daily on Days 1 to 28 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression. The TMZ group will receive 75 mg/m2 orally once daily with RT, then after a 4-week rest, will take adjuvant TMZ 150-200 mg/m2 orally once daily on Days 1 to 5 of each 28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles or until progression. Participants will complete scheduled study visits and keep a diary recording their study medication intake. Researchers will monitor overall survival over 24 months and assess safety and efficacy throughout the study period. Participants must meet specific health and diagnostic criteria and will be closely followed for treatment effects and adverse events.

This research aims to understand the safety, effectiveness, and overall treatment experience of participants prescribed BRIUMVI4 (ublituximab-xiiy) in a real-world setting. The study focuses on people living with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), a form of multiple sclerosis characterized by episodes of new or increasing neurological symptoms. It is designed to gather detailed insights from actual use outside of controlled clinical trials. Participants in this study are those who have been prescribed BRIUMVI4 but have not yet received their first infusion at the start of the study. There is no intervention assigned by the study itself; instead, it observes the outcomes and experiences of patients treated with BRIUMVI4 as part of their routine care over time. Throughout the study, researchers will track the annualized relapse rate (ARR) up to week 96 to measure disease activity. Participants' safety, treatment adherence, and experiences will be evaluated through regular monitoring, including any adverse events. The total duration of participation covers up to 96 weeks, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of long-term treatment effects and patient-reported outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of Ifinatamab Deruxtecan (I-DXd) compared to treatment chosen by physicians for adults with relapsed extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The study aims to find out if I-DXd can improve the objective response rate, meaning the proportion of patients whose cancer shrinks or disappears, and extend overall survival time compared to other treatments. Secondary goals include assessing safety, patient-reported outcomes, immune response to I-DXd, B7-H3 protein levels, and how the drug is processed in the body. Participants will receive either I-DXd at a dose of 12 mg/kg given intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle or one of the physician's choice treatments including Topotecan, Amrubicin, or Lurbinectedin, administered according to local standards of care. The study is randomized and open-label, meaning treatments are assigned by chance and both patients and doctors know which treatment is given. During the study, participants will be closely monitored with tumor assessments to evaluate response and detect disease progression, safety evaluations, and quality of life questionnaires. The main outcomes measured are the objective response rate assessed by a blinded independent review and overall survival time, tracked for up to approximately five years after randomization. Researchers will also monitor for any adverse effects and collect health economics data to understand the broader impact of treatments.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of lebrikizumab in people aged 12 years and older who have chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and are being treated with intranasal corticosteroids. This Phase 3 study is designed to better understand how lebrikizumab works alongside standard nasal spray treatments over a period of about 18 months. Participants will receive either lebrikizumab or a placebo by subcutaneous injection, while continuing their regular intranasal corticosteroid spray treatment. The study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, meaning neither participants nor researchers know who receives the active drug or placebo. The study measures changes from baseline in nasal congestion severity and nasal polyp size using participant reports and endoscopic scoring at the start and after 24 weeks. During the study, participants will undergo evaluations including nasal examinations and symptom assessments at specified times. Researchers will monitor nasal polyp scores and nasal congestion severity to assess treatment impact. Safety and side effects will also be closely observed throughout the study. The total duration of participation is approximately 18 months, allowing careful tracking of treatment outcomes and safety over time.

This research aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of lebrikizumab in adults diagnosed with perennial allergic rhinitis, a condition characterized by year-round nasal allergy symptoms. The study is a Phase 3 trial involving adult participants who have confirmed allergic reactions to indoor allergens. Researchers are investigating how lebrikizumab compares with placebo, alongside standard intranasal corticosteroid therapy, to better understand treatment options for this condition. Participants will receive either the investigational drug lebrikizumab (LY3650150) administered by subcutaneous injection, a placebo injection, or standard intranasal corticosteroid spray. The study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, ensuring that neither participants nor researchers know who receives which treatment during the trial. Treatment and observation periods will span up to 29.5 months. During the study, participants will be monitored for changes in their nasal symptoms, specifically measuring the total nasal symptom score from the start of the study to week 16. Researchers will conduct various assessments including clinical evaluations and allergy testing to track symptom changes and treatment effects. Safety will be closely observed throughout the study duration, and participants may be followed for nearly two and a half years in total.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab to standard chemotherapy, with or without radiation, can improve survival for patients aged 5 to 60 years with newly diagnosed stage I or II classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares outcomes in groups based on their early response to initial chemotherapy, aiming to understand if immunotherapy can lead to better progression-free survival and overall survival compared to standard treatment alone. The study also looks at side effects, quality of life, and long-term health impacts across different patient groups. Participants first receive two cycles of standard ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days, followed by imaging to classify their response as rapid or slow early responders and their risk status as favorable or unfavorable. Based on these factors, patients are assigned to one of eight treatment arms that include either continued standard chemotherapy regimens or immunotherapy with brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab, sometimes combined with involved-site radiation therapy. Treatments are given intravenously or orally depending on the drugs, and cycles typically last 28 days. Imaging and blood samples are collected regularly throughout the study. Throughout the trial, participants undergo frequent scans such as FDG-PET, CT, MRI, and PET-CT to monitor their disease status. Blood samples and questionnaires assess treatment effects and quality of life. After completing treatment, patients have scheduled follow-up visits every 3 months for the first year, then every 6 months for two years, and annually up to 12 years to track long-term outcomes, side effects, and survival. The main measurements focus on progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment-related adverse events, and patient-reported experiences.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of remibrutinib compared to dupilumab in adults with moderate to severe chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) that is not adequately controlled by second generation H1-antihistamines (sgH1-AHs). This Phase 3b, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study is conducted in the US and focuses on early treatment effects at 4 weeks and earlier. The study includes a screening period of up to 4 weeks, followed by a 12-week core treatment period where about 400 participants are randomly assigned to receive either remibrutinib (25 mg twice daily by mouth) with a placebo injection or dupilumab (a 600 mg loading dose followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks by injection) with a placebo tablet. All participants continue their stable dose of sgH1-AH during this period, with the option to add rescue doses if needed, not exceeding four times the standard dose per day. After the core period, participants may join an optional open-label extension to receive remibrutinib for an additional 12 weeks if the drug is not commercially available. Participants will complete daily diaries and regular assessments to track urticaria symptoms and treatment effects. Researchers will measure changes in the Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) from the start to Week 4. Safety follow-up will occur for 12 weeks after treatment ends, with phone calls and site visits as needed, continuing longer if participants join the extension. The total study duration includes screening, treatment, optional extension, and safety follow-up phases.