Edmonds

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of combining inavolisib with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) and letrozole compared to placebo plus CDK4/6i and letrozole. This study focuses on participants with endocrine-sensitive PIK3CA-mutated hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer. It aims to assess treatment outcomes in the first-line setting for this specific breast cancer type. Participants will be assigned to receive either oral inavolisib once daily or a matching oral placebo once daily. All participants will also receive a CDK4/6 inhibitor on either Days 1-21 or Days 1-28 of each 28-day cycle, along with daily oral letrozole. This randomized, double-blind study will compare these two treatment combinations to monitor differences in disease progression and safety. Throughout the study, researchers will evaluate progression-free survival from the time of randomization until disease progression or death, up to 7 years. Participants will undergo assessments including tumor measurements by RECIST criteria, performance status evaluations, and monitoring of blood and organ function before treatment begins. Safety and efficacy will be closely observed during treatment, aiming to provide detailed long-term data on the study therapies.

This trial is focused on adults with KRAS/NRAS and BRAF wild-type unresectable or metastatic left-sided colorectal cancer. It compares the length of time participants remain free from disease progression when treated with amivantamab combined with chemotherapy regimens (mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI) versus cetuximab combined with the same chemotherapy regimens. The study is a randomized, open-label Phase 3 clinical trial designed to evaluate progression-free survival over a period of up to 4 years and 2 months. Participants receive either amivantamab with chemotherapy drugs including 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium or levoleucovorin, oxaliplatin, or irinotecan hydrochloride, or cetuximab with the same chemotherapy regimens (mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI). Treatments are administered as first-line therapy for their colorectal cancer. The trial assesses how these treatments affect disease progression and survival. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly through assessments and evaluations to measure progression-free survival. Researchers will gather data via blinded independent central review to ensure unbiased assessment of disease status. Participants are followed up for safety and treatment efficacy over the study duration, which may last over four years.

Researchers are investigating the safety and tolerability of ASP1002 in adults with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors that have high levels of the protein claudin 4. This Phase 1 study aims to find a suitable dose of ASP1002 by first testing different dose levels in small groups, then expanding to doses that were safe and effective. Participants have previously been treated with standard therapies or have chosen not to receive them. The study has two parts: Part 1 involves dose escalation with small groups receiving increasing doses of ASP1002 through intravenous infusion every week, every two weeks, or every three weeks in 21- or 28-day treatment cycles. Part 2 uses doses identified in Part 1 to treat new groups. Treatment continues for up to 2 years unless medical issues, cancer progression, new treatments, withdrawal, or missed visits occur. Participants will have regular clinic visits for health and safety checks, including scans (CT or MRI) to monitor cancer status and optional tumor sample collections during and after treatment. After stopping treatment, participants will have follow-up visits within 7 days, then at 1 and 3 months, with health monitoring for up to 1 year after the last dose. Researchers will track side effects, physical exams, lab results, vital signs, ECGs, and performance status over up to 27 months to assess safety and tolerability.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of adding LY3537982 (olomorasib) to standard anti-cancer drugs compared to standard treatment alone in participants with untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has a specific KRAS G12C gene mutation. This pivotal Phase 3 trial includes participants with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and considers their programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels. The study includes multiple parts: Dose Optimization, Part A, and Part B are randomized, while Safety Lead-In for Part B and Part C are non-randomized. Treatments being assessed include LY3537982 taken orally, pembrolizumab administered intravenously, and standard chemotherapy drugs such as cisplatin, carboplatin, and pemetrexed given intravenously. Participants receive these treatments according to their assigned groups based on their PD-L1 expression and tumor histology. Participants will be monitored with regular assessments including measuring disease progression, safety evaluations, and treatment emergent adverse events for up to approximately one year, with overall study participation potentially lasting up to three years depending on individual response and health status. Outcome measures focus on progression-free survival and safety, capturing any adverse events from the start of treatment until disease progression or death.

Researchers are evaluating a drug called sigvotatug vedotin alone and in combination with pembrolizumab, with or without chemotherapy, to determine its safety and effects in people with various advanced solid tumors. This Phase 1 study includes participants with specific cancers like non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck squamous cell cancer, HER2-negative breast cancer, esophageal cancers, ovarian cancer, and others. The trial aims to find out the side effects of sigvotatug vedotin and whether it can treat these solid tumors effectively. The study is divided into four parts. Part A focuses on finding the right dose of sigvotatug vedotin. Part B tests the safety and effectiveness of that dose. Parts C and D look at the safety and effectiveness of sigvotatug vedotin combined with pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy drugs carboplatin or cisplatin. Participants receive these drugs intravenously, with pembrolizumab given every 3 or 6 weeks and chemotherapy every 3 weeks depending on the drug. During the study, participants undergo tumor biopsies, physical exams, and disease assessments to monitor treatment effects. Researchers track side effects, lab abnormalities, and dose-limiting toxicities for up to 30-37 days after the last dose of sigvotatug vedotin, and for up to 3 years after pembrolizumab treatment. The study follows participants with regular safety monitoring and evaluations of tumor response throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of adding Tersolisib (LY4064809/STX-478) to other anti-cancer drugs as the first treatment for adults with advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. This phase 3 study focuses on participants whose cancer has a specific genetic change called a PIK3CA mutation and who have not received prior treatment for advanced breast cancer. The study aims to understand how well this treatment combination works and its safety over time. Participants will receive Tersolisib or a placebo, combined with a CDK4/6 inhibitor (Ribociclib, Palbociclib, or Abemaciclib) and endocrine therapy (Anastrozole, Letrozole, Exemestane, or Fulvestrant). All drugs are given orally except for Fulvestrant, which is given by injection into the muscle. The study includes two parts: Part 1 allows participants who have had up to two prior treatments for advanced breast cancer, including chemotherapy; Part 2 includes those with no prior treatment for advanced disease and classifies them as endocrine sensitive or resistant based on their cancer history. During the study, participants will be regularly assessed for cancer response, progression-free survival, and side effects. Researchers will monitor measurable disease or bone involvement and track overall response rates, including complete or partial tumor shrinkage. The study will continue as long as the treatment is helping without causing unbearable side effects. Follow-up may last up to five years to observe long-term outcomes and safety.

Researchers are evaluating two treatment combinations for patients with melanoma that has spread to the brain and has a specific BRAF-V600 mutation. This phase II trial compares encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab against ipilimumab and nivolumab to determine which approach better controls and shrinks brain metastases from melanoma. The study also aims to assess overall survival, response rates, treatment duration, and side effects of each regimen. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives encorafenib orally once daily, binimetinib orally twice daily, and nivolumab intravenously every 28 days. The other group receives nivolumab intravenously and ipilimumab intravenously during the first four cycles, with cycles every 21 days initially, then every 28 days thereafter. Treatment continues unless the disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. After treatment ends, participants have follow-up visits every six months for two years, then yearly until three years after starting the study. During the trial, participants undergo brain MRIs to monitor tumor response using standardized criteria. Imaging, tumor tissue, spinal fluid, stool, and blood samples are collected for research. Safety and effectiveness are carefully assessed through scans, physical exams, lab tests, and side effect monitoring. Progression-free survival up to three years after randomization is the main outcome. Participants remain in the study for about three years with periodic evaluations to track their health and disease status.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of a new combination treatment using BMS-986489 (a fixed dose combination of BMS-986012 and Nivolumab) alongside Carboplatin and Etoposide compared to the current standard treatment with Atezolizumab plus Carboplatin and Etoposide. This study focuses on adults with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer and is conducted as a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. The goal is to find out which combination works better as a first-line therapy for this advanced lung cancer. Participants will receive either BMS-986489 combined with Carboplatin and Etoposide or Atezolizumab combined with Carboplatin and Etoposide. Each drug will be given at specified doses on certain days according to the study protocol. The study compares these two treatment approaches to see their effects and safety when used as initial therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. During the study, participants will be closely monitored over a period of up to 5 years to assess overall survival. Researchers will use imaging techniques like CT scans or MRIs to measure tumor response and will evaluate participants' health and ability to perform normal activities. Safety and side effects will also be tracked throughout the study to ensure participant well-being.

Researchers are evaluating two surgical procedures, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, to see how well they reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women who have BRCA1 gene mutations. The study aims to determine if removing just the fallopian tubes (bilateral salpingectomy) is almost as effective as removing both the fallopian tubes and ovaries (bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) in lowering ovarian cancer risk. This trial also assesses symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, sexual function, cancer-related distress, decision-making about surgery, and treatment side effects in these patients. Participants choose between two groups: one group undergoes bilateral salpingectomy and may have their ovaries removed later, while the other group undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups receive pelvic or transvaginal ultrasounds or pelvic MRI scans during screening, and blood samples are collected throughout the trial. Ancillary studies include quality-of-life assessments and questionnaires. The study also collects tissue and blood samples for future research. After surgery, participants have follow-up visits at 10 to 60 days, then at 6, 12, and 24 months, and annually for up to 20 years. Researchers monitor the time until any high-grade serous carcinomas develop, specifically ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers. They also track menopausal symptoms, sexual function, quality of life, cancer distress, medical decisions about surgery, and any adverse events during this long-term follow-up.

This research aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of pumitamig combined with chemotherapy compared to bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in adults with previously untreated, unresectable, or metastatic colorectal cancer. The study is a blinded, randomized Phase 2/3 trial targeting participants with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma that cannot be cured with surgery. Participants must not have certain genetic markers such as mismatch repair deficiency, microsatellite instability-high status, or BRAF V600E mutation. Participants will receive either pumitamig or bevacizumab along with chemotherapy regimens including FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or CAPOX at specified doses and schedules. The interventions involve administering these drugs on specified days, though exact dosing details are not provided. The study compares these two treatment combinations to assess their safety and efficacy in this patient population. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for tumor response using RECIST v1.1 criteria, progression-free survival, and overall survival for up to five years. Researchers will evaluate confirmed complete or partial tumor responses, survival rates, and disease progression. The study includes regular assessments to track treatment effects and safety over a long-term follow-up period, ensuring comprehensive monitoring of participant outcomes.