Study Comparing Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and Sacropexy for Treating Pelvic Floor Prolapse in Adult Women

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are evaluating the laparoscopic lateral suspension LLS technique as a way to correct anterior apical vaginal prolapse at the level of the dome or uterus. This study compares LLS with the conventional sacropexy surgical technique to determine if LLS offers similar anatomical and functional results while minimizing possible complications and making the learning curve easier for surgeons. The study focuses on women with pelvic floor disorders involving certain stages of vaginal prolapse. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups one group will receive the lateral laparoscopic suspension LLS procedure, and the other will undergo sacropexy without posterior mesh fixation on the puborectalis muscle. Both are surgical procedures aimed at correcting prolapse. The study will monitor patients for up to 12 months after surgery to assess outcomes. During the study, participants will be evaluated using questionnaires that measure pelvic organ prolapse symptoms, colorectal-anal distress, and urinary distress, as well as tracking the number of patients who experience symptomatic failure. Researchers will also assess intestinal and pain symptoms and anatomical results over the 12-month follow-up period. The trial excludes patients with certain surgical histories or medical conditions and focuses on adult women with specific stages of prolapse.

Multicenter Study on the Correction of Prolapse Via Laparoscopy