Robotic-assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in the Management of Obese Patients With Early Endometrial Cancer in the Sentinel Lymph Node Era: a Randomized Controlled Study
Led by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS · Updated on 2024-10-03
566
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
156 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
AI-Summary
Brief Title
Who Can Participate
AI-Screening
Your Study Journey
Trial Site Locations
Research Team
How is the study designed?
Similar Trials
Frequently Asked Questions
Research Publications
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
Researchers are evaluating the best minimally invasive surgical method for women with morbid obesity (BMI 30) who have early-stage endometrial cancer. This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery to determine which approach is more suitable in these patients. The aim is to confirm previous observations suggesting benefits of robotic surgery and to gather robust data in this specific patient group.
The study involves two groups: one receiving robotic-assisted surgery using the DaVinci Xi system, and the other undergoing standard laparoscopic surgery. Both procedures include total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and lymph node staging, with attention to sentinel lymph node mapping. The trial will also assess adherence to surgical algorithms, perioperative complications, surgical duration, ergonomics, quality of life, and long-term survival outcomes.
Participants will be monitored throughout the study with evaluations at various time points, including quality of life assessments at baseline, 1, 4 weeks, and 3, 6 months post-surgery. Researchers will measure the primary outcome of conversion rates from minimally invasive surgery to laparotomy. Secondary outcomes include surgical duration, complications, adherence to protocols, ergonomics scores, and survival measures over up to 72 months. This comprehensive follow-up aims to provide data on safety, effectiveness, and patient experience during and after surgery.
CONDITIONS
Brief Title
Robotic-assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Obese Patients With Early Endometrial Cancer
Who Can Participate
Age: 18Years - 75Years
FEMALE
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
BMI �30
Age over 18 years
Histologically confirmed endometrioid endometrial cancer
Clinical early stage (stage I)
No contraindication for minimally invasive surgery
ASA less than 4
Written informed consent
You will not qualify if you...
High probability of laparotomy due to uterine volume (ultrasound estimated weight over 250 g)
Concomitant pelvic disease or anatomical characteristics of the patient
Use of uterine manipulator
Age over 75 years
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
1
2
3
Your Study Journey
Screening
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Surgery and Immediate Post-operative Care
Duration - Surgery day plus initial hospital stay (varies by recovery)
Participants undergo either robotic-assisted or conventional laparoscopic surgery for total hysterectomy with lymph node staging, followed by immediate post-operative care.
1 surgical procedure and hospital stay
Post-operative Follow-up
Duration - Up to 6 months after surgery
Participants are monitored for perioperative complications, quality of life, and adherence to surgical protocols at various time points after surgery.
Visits at 1 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months post-surgery
Long-term Monitoring
Duration - Up to 72 months after surgery
Participants are followed to assess overall survival, disease-free survival, and surgical quality outcomes.
Periodic visits over several years for survival and quality assessments
Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the management of obese patients with early endometrial cancer in the sentinel lymph node era: a randomized controlled study (RObese).