Comparing Biofeedback-Guided and Conventional Therapy to Improve Muscle Strength and Posture in Adults with Upper Cross Syndrome

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are evaluating the effects of biofeedback-guided training compared to conventional therapy on muscle strength and postural alignment in adults with Upper Cross Syndrome UCS. This condition, often caused by prolonged poor posture and repetitive movements, leads to muscle imbalances, neck and upper back pain, and postural deviations like forward head posture and increased thoracic kyphosis. The study aims to assess which approach better improves muscle strength and posture in UCS patients aged 25 to 45 years. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups Group A receives biofeedback-guided strength training targeting deep cervical flexors, rhomboids, and trapezius muscles using a biofeedback pressure unit at different pressure levels, combined with a warm-up hot pack. Group B receives conventional therapy involving hot pack application and a structured exercise program including chin tucks, scapular squeezes, and pectoral stretches. Both groups undergo 12 sessions over 4 weeks, with three sessions per week. During the study, participants are assessed at baseline, after the first session, and weekly thereafter using standardized measures such as the cranio-cervical flexion test, neck pain rating scale, neck disability index, and cervical range of motion tests. Researchers monitor changes in muscle strength, postural alignment, pain levels, and neck function. The total study participation lasts four weeks, with careful tracking of symptoms and functional improvements to compare the two intervention methods.

Effects of Biofeedback-Guided Training on Muscle Strength and Postural Alignment in Upper Cross Syndrome.