Newmarket

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of a medicine called Ritlecitinib for adults with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa HS, a condition that causes long-lasting painful red lumps on the skin. The study focuses on participants who have not responded well to or cannot tolerate antibiotics for HS. This Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to understand how Ritlecitinib compares to placebo in treating this condition. Participants will be randomly assigned to take either Ritlecitinib or a matching placebo by mouth once daily at home. The study includes a loading dose of Ritlecitinib for the first 8 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose for the next 8 weeks, totaling 16 weeks of treatment. The placebo group will follow the same schedule with a pill that looks like the study medicine but contains no active drug. Throughout the study, participants will have about 10 clinic visits over approximately 24 weeks, including screening, Day 1, and follow-ups every 1, 2, or 4 weeks until Week 16. At these visits, health status will be reviewed through physical exams, blood and urine tests, vital signs, chest X-rays, ECGs, hearing tests, and questionnaires. Participants will also record daily medication intake and HS symptoms using a mobile eDiary. Researchers will measure skin response and safety outcomes to assess the effects of the study medicine compared to placebo.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of delgocitinib cream applied twice daily compared to a cream vehicle for treating adults with mild to severe lichen sclerosus LS, a skin condition affecting mostly females in the anogenital area. The study is conducted in two parts Part 1 enrolls female participants to determine the best dose, and Part 2 includes both female and male participants to further assess the chosen dose and safety in males. Participants receive different dosing regimens of delgocitinib cream or cream vehicle applied twice daily during a 12-week initial treatment period, followed by a 40-week continuation treatment period. Different groups receive varying doses or sequences of delgocitinib cream and cream vehicle to compare effects. A substudy evaluates male participants separately to assess safety and efficacy. During the trial lasting between 55 and 60 weeks, participants undergo regular assessments including clinical evaluations of LS severity using IGA-LS scores, pain and itch numerical rating scales, and quality of life indexes. Safety is monitored through adverse event tracking and laboratory tests. The main outcome measured is the number of participants achieving a specific improvement in LS severity at Week 12, with additional evaluations continuing through Week 52.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab monotherapy as the first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer mNSCLC whose tumors express high levels of PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter global study focuses on patients with mNSCLC without certain genetic mutations who are suitable for this treatment approach. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The study compares these two drugs over repeated treatment cycles as first-line therapy. Both treatments are biological agents given by infusion, and the study is designed to monitor their effects over up to approximately five years. During the trial, participants will undergo regular assessments including physical exams, imaging scans such as CT or MRI to measure tumor lesions, and laboratory tests to evaluate organ function. Researchers will closely monitor overall survival, progression-free survival, treatment response, duration of response, and patient-reported outcomes on physical functioning and quality of life. Safety and immunogenicity of rilvegostomig will also be evaluated. Participants are followed and assessed for up to five years to gather comprehensive data on treatment effects and long-term outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating the long-term safety and effectiveness of Afimkibart also known as RO7790121 in adults with Atopic Dermatitis who participated in earlier Afimkibart clinical trials. This Phase 2 extension study focuses on participants who previously responded to Afimkibart treatment, aiming to gather extended data over several years. Participants will receive Afimkibart through subcutaneous injections according to a schedule outlined in the study protocol. The study is non-randomized and involves parallel groups, with all participants receiving the active drug. The treatment and follow-up periods can last up to six years to assess long-term outcomes. Throughout the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including the Eczema Area and Severity Index EASI, Investigator Global Assessment IGA, patient questionnaires on eczema symptoms and quality of life POEM and DLQI, and blood tests to measure drug levels and immune response. Researchers will monitor adverse events and antibody development against Afimkibart. Participation involves ongoing evaluations and monitoring over the extended study duration.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of GIA632 in adults aged 18 to 99 years with non-segmental vitiligo NSV. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2b study aims to understand the dose-response relationship of GIA632 and determine the best dose to advance to a Phase 3 study. Participants have NSV affecting specific body surface areas confirmed by physical examination. Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of four different doses of GIA632 or a placebo. The assigned treatment is administered over a 48-week core period. After this period, an extension phase assesses longer-term safety and efficacy of the study drug. The study compares changes in facial and total body vitiligo scores at various time points up to 48 weeks. Throughout the study, participants undergo assessments including Vitiligo Area Scoring Index VASI measurements on the face and body, and the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale VNS. These assessments occur at baseline and multiple follow-up visits up to week 48. Researchers monitor participants for treatment effects and safety during the entire study duration, which runs until 2030, ensuring detailed evaluation of GIA632 over time.

Researchers are evaluating AZD0780, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, in a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study. This trial focuses on patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease ASCVD or those at high risk for a first ASCVD event. The study aims to assess how AZD0780 compares to placebo in reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, also known as MACE-PLUS, over the course of the trial. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either oral AZD0780 once daily or a matching placebo once daily. The study continues until a primary analysis censoring date, which may be up to approximately 54 months from randomization. After this, a study closure visit will be conducted as the final visit for each participant. During the study, participants will be regularly monitored for cardiovascular events including heart attacks, strokes, urgent coronary revascularizations, and other related outcomes. Researchers will track the time to first occurrence of these events as the primary outcome. Safety and other secondary outcomes like all-cause mortality will also be assessed. The total participation time can last up to about 54 months, with ongoing evaluations throughout this period.

Researchers are studying women with a newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer that is node negative and 3 cm or smaller in size to compare two types of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery BCS. The study aims to see if partial breast irradiation PBI given once daily over one week is not worse than whole breast irradiation WBI in preventing cancer return and whether it results in better cosmetic outcomes. This is a randomized, single-blind trial focusing on local recurrence and patient-assessed cosmesis three years after treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either PBI or WBI. Both treatments deliver a total of 26 Gy radiation in 5 fractions, given once daily over 5 to 7 days with up to 8 days allowed for scheduling reasons. PBI targets the tumor bed plus a margin of normal tissue, while WBI targets the whole breast. Patients will not know which treatment they receive to avoid bias in cosmetic assessments. Stratification factors include tumor size, estrogen receptor status, and clinical center. During the study, participants will be monitored for local recurrence annually for five years and will assess their cosmetic outcome at three and five years post-treatment. Researchers will also evaluate survival, disease-free survival, radiation side effects, and quality of life at various intervals. Clinical assessments and nurse evaluations of cosmesis will occur at three and five years. Overall, participant involvement spans several years with multiple follow-up visits to measure outcomes and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of LY4005130 in adults with severe alopecia areata, a condition causing significant hair loss. This phase 2 study compares LY4005130 with a placebo to see how well the drug works and how well participants tolerate it. Blood tests will be used to understand how the body processes the drug and its effects. Participants will receive either LY4005130 or a placebo, both administered intravenously into a vein. The study follows a randomized, double-blind design, meaning neither participants nor researchers know who receives the drug or placebo. The study lasts about 48 weeks, including screening. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including blood tests and scalp biopsies to track changes in hair loss severity and gene expression. The main measurement is the percentage of participants reaching a certain improvement in hair loss by week 24. Safety and side effects will be closely monitored throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating sacituzumab tirumotecan alone and in combination with pembrolizumab compared to treatment chosen by the physician in participants with hormone receptor positivehuman epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative HRHER2- breast cancer that is locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic. The study aims to see if these treatments improve progression-free survival compared to standard physician-chosen therapies. This is a Phase 3 clinical trial assessing advanced breast cancer treatments. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups sacituzumab tirumotecan alone given by intravenous infusion every two weeks until disease progression or discontinuation sacituzumab tirumotecan plus pembrolizumab with sacituzumab tirumotecan given every two weeks and pembrolizumab given every six weeks for up to about two years or treatment chosen by the physician, which may include various chemotherapy options such as paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, capecitabine, or liposomal doxorubicin, administered with schedules depending on the drug. Treatments continue until disease progression or discontinuation. During the study, participants will have regular assessments including imaging to evaluate progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, and quality of life measures using questionnaires. Safety is monitored by tracking adverse events and treatment discontinuations. The primary outcome is measured up to approximately 38 months, with additional secondary outcomes followed up to about 77 months. Participants are followed closely through study visits and evaluations throughout the trial period.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of the ABC Bicuspid Sizing Algorithm on patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement TAVR using the Sapien 3 valve. This international, multi-center study aims to determine if the algorithm improves technical success immediately after the procedure and device success 30 days later. The study also examines how additional imaging techniques like gated computed tomography and artificial intelligence-based simulations influence treatment decisions. The study involves about 290 patients eligible for TAVR or surgical aortic valve replacement SAVR. Physicians use the ABC Bicuspid Sizing Algorithm to guide treatment allocation between TAVR and SAVR, as well as valve sizing and deployment for those receiving TAVR. Some patients may have further evaluation with gated CT or AI simulations to assess risks. Data for TAVR patients is collected at baseline, during the procedure, at hospital discharge, 30 days after, and annually up to 5 years. SAVR patients have data collected at baseline and during the procedure only. Participants will undergo diagnostic imaging including CT scans evaluated with the sizing algorithm and may receive additional assessments if indicated. Researchers collect data on procedure success, device outcomes, conduction disturbances, pacemaker implants, stroke, vascular complications, mortality, valve function, and hospitalizations for heart failure over 5 years. Follow-up visits occur at 30 days and annually, allowing long-term monitoring of outcomes after treatment.