Lorient

Researchers are monitoring the use of the Virtue4 Male Sling System in men with stress urinary incontinence following prostate surgery. This observational study aims to collect medical data on the devices effectiveness and safety over 12 and 36 months after implantation. The study is conducted in multiple centers across Europe and focuses on real-world use by experienced urologists. The Virtue4 Male Sling is an implantable device made of polypropylene mesh designed to support the urethra and help manage urinary incontinence caused by intrinsic sphincter deficiency. This study involves men who have already received the sling during routine clinical care. Follow-up includes visits at baseline before implantation, between 1 and 3 months post-operation, and at 12 months, with additional annual questionnaires sent out at 24 and 36 months. Participants will undergo routine clinical assessments, including questionnaires about their urinary symptoms and quality of life, pad weight testing, uroflowmetry, and measurement of urine remaining after voiding at several points during the study. Researchers will monitor patient-reported improvement and any adverse events at 12 months. The study extends to 36 months with ongoing questionnaires to track long-term outcomes and satisfaction. Participation involves regular clinical visits and mailed surveys over three years.

Researchers are studying the impact and burden of three skin conditions moderate or severe alopecia areata, non-segmental vitiligo, and moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa. The study includes adolescents and adults and aims to understand how these conditions affect quality of life and daily functioning in a large global population. This is an observational study where participants with each condition will have a single visit for data collection following routine clinical practice. No experimental treatments are given instead, the study gathers information during this one visit to assess disease characteristics and impact. During the visit, participants will complete questionnaires and clinical assessments specific to their condition. These include tools measuring symptom impact, hair loss severity, skin depigmentation, and quality of life related to each disease. This helps researchers better understand the real-world burden of these conditions. Participation involves only this one visit, with no long-term follow-up or additional procedures.

Researchers are evaluating camizestrant against standard endocrine therapy for patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer who have an intermediate or high risk of disease recurrence. These patients must have completed locoregional therapy and at least 2 to 5 years of standard adjuvant endocrine therapy. The study is a Phase III open-label trial focused on improving outcomes for these patients over a long-term period. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either camizestrant orally or continue with the standard endocrine therapy chosen by their investigator, which may include aromatase inhibitors exemestane, letrozole, anastrozole or tamoxifen. Treatment in each group lasts for 60 months. The study allows prior use of CDK46 inhibitors and includes a follow-up period extending up to 10 years from the last patient randomization. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments to monitor invasive breast cancer-free survival and other outcomes such as invasive disease-free survival, distant relapse-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Researchers will also evaluate symptoms like joint pain, hot flushes, and vaginal dryness using specific scales, along with quality of life measures and pharmacokinetics. Safety monitoring continues up to 28 days after the last dose, and participants remain under observation for up to 10 years total.

This trial studies participants with previously untreated, unresectable, or metastatic colorectal cancer. It evaluates the safety and effectiveness of pumitamig combined with chemotherapy compared to bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy. The study includes participants who do not have specific genetic markers like dMMR, MSI-H, or BRAF V600E mutations, which may affect treatment response. Participants receive treatment with study drugs such as pumitamig, bevacizumab, and chemotherapy regimens including FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and CAPOX. The treatments are given at specified doses on specific days. The study uses a randomized, double-blind design with multiple experimental and comparator arms to assess these combinations. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular assessments to measure tumor response and survival outcomes. Key evaluations include imaging tests using RECIST v1.1 criteria, monitored by both investigators and independent reviewers, over a period of up to 5 years. Researchers track objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival to determine treatment outcomes and safety.

Researchers are conducting a Phase III international trial to study the effects and safety of androgen deprivation therapy ADT with or without darolutamide in men newly diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer who have vulnerable functional abilities. This study specifically includes patients who have not chosen treatment with docetaxel or other androgen receptor pathway inhibitors. The goal is to evaluate how these treatments impact disease progression and patient health over time. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups one receiving ADT plus darolutamide 600 mg taken orally twice daily, and the other receiving ADT plus a placebo taken with the same schedule. Treatment will continue until imaging shows disease progression or until the patient or doctor decides to stop for reasons such as side effects or other health issues. After stopping treatment, patients will enter a follow-up phase lasting up to 10 years to monitor survival, further treatments, and any ongoing or new side effects. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to check for cancer progression, blood tests, evaluations of urinary symptoms, and quality of life questionnaires. Researchers will track outcomes like progression-free survival, overall survival, symptom changes, and adverse events. Monitoring visits will occur periodically both during treatment and follow-up to gather comprehensive data on health status and treatment effects.

Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer NMIBC is a type of bladder tumor that affects the inner lining of the bladder without invading the muscle layer. This research aims to collect and analyze real-world data on how NMIBC is managed and followed up in clinical practice across France. The study seeks to assess the performance of urine tests used to detect tumor recurrence and to understand variations in treatment and patient outcomes. The study is observational and involves collecting medical data from patients being monitored for NMIBC, including results from urine biomarker tests done before biopsies or resections. Urologists participating in the French Urology Association will record findings from regular bladder endoscopic exams and urine test results during routine care visits. Data analysis will focus on the accuracy of urine tests in predicting tumor recurrence and how this varies by tumor characteristics and prior treatments. Participants will have their medical history, treatments, and urine test results entered into a registry at enrollment. During follow-up visits scheduled as part of their personalized care, data on bladder exams and urine tests will be collected. Researchers will evaluate outcomes such as recurrence-free survival and the diagnostic value of urine biomarkers over a five-year period. The study plans to include around 8,000 patients over six years to improve understanding of NMIBC management and follow-up.

Researchers are studying advanced non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC with ALK gene rearrangement treated with next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors TKIs as first-line therapy. This prospective study, part of the national EXPLORE ALK cohort, aims to understand the biological characteristics and resistance mechanisms of this cancer type. It involves patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC who are not eligible for curative locoregional treatment and have confirmed ALK rearrangement. The study collects tumor tissue samples at diagnosis and at disease progression, if available, to analyze ALK fusion partners, variants, and co-mutations using RNA sequencing. Blood samples are taken at diagnosis, first tumor evaluation, and disease progression to analyze circulating tumor DNA ctDNA with next-generation sequencing. Treatments studied include alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib, and entrectinib, either marketed or under early access programs. Participants provide blood samples and allow use of tumor tissue for centralized biological analyses. Researchers measure progression-free survival up to 72 months as the primary outcome, along with overall survival, response rates, duration of response, ctDNA clearance, and resistance mechanisms associated with treatment and ALK fusion partners. The study involves regular evaluations over several years to monitor treatment outcomes and biological changes.

This research aims to understand whether an immune process similar to allograft rejection causes intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy ICP. The study includes pregnant women with and without ICP to explore if immunomodulatory treatments might be helpful. It is an observational study conducted by the University Hospital, Brest, focused on inflammation in ICP. The study involves 322 pregnant women at delivery, divided into two groups 161 women diagnosed with ICP and 161 without ICP. Blood tests will be performed on both mothers and newborns to measure various biological markers related to inflammation, allograft rejection, and angiogenesis. Placental tissue will also be analyzed to check for chronic inflammation. Participants will provide blood samples and placenta at delivery for detailed analysis. Researchers will compare biological and placental markers between the ICP and non-ICP groups. The main outcome measured is the prevalence of placental chronic inflammation at delivery, alongside levels of biological factors involved in inflammation, rejection, and angiogenesis. The study will monitor these outcomes at delivery and conclude by June 2025.

Researchers are studying patients with community-acquired pneumonia who need oxygen therapy due to acute respiratory distress and low blood oxygen levels. This research aims to see if placing patients in a prone position lying face down while they receive nasal high flow oxygen can reduce the need for intubation and improve outcomes. The study particularly excludes patients with COVID-19 and focuses on non-COVID pneumonia cases. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will be encouraged and assisted to lie in the prone position for at least 8 hours per day in multiple sessions, aiming for up to 16 hours if tolerated. The other group will receive usual care with nasal high flow oxygen therapy but no prone positioning. Both groups will have oxygen levels monitored and care adjusted to maintain target oxygen saturation. During the study, patients will be observed for intubation rates within 28 days, comfort levels during prone positioning, oxygenation changes, time to escalation of breathing support, and overall outcomes including mortality up to 90 days. Safety measures like skin and infection monitoring will also be recorded. Quality of life will be assessed at 90 days and 5 years, with nursing workload tracked within the first day after randomization.

Researchers are studying emergency intubation in patients with acute respiratory failure who need airway management before reaching the hospital. The study aims to compare the success of the first intubation attempt using a bougie device versus using an endotracheal tube alone in the prehospital setting, where challenges like difficult environment and risk of complications are higher. The trial involves two groups one where the first intubation attempt is done with an endotracheal tube plus a bougie, a flexible device to guide the tube, and the other using the endotracheal tube alone. The bougie is inserted first under visual guidance, followed by the tube, while the tube-alone group inserts the tube directly. The use of stylets is not allowed. This comparison helps evaluate the devices impact on success and safety during emergency intubation. Participants will be managed by physician-staffed mobile intensive care units and monitored for success of the first pass intubation within 10 minutes of blade introduction. Additional assessments include monitoring for complications like low oxygen levels, heart rate changes, cardiac arrest, aspiration, and other adverse events within hours after intubation. The time to confirm correct tube placement, perceived difficulty, and injuries or complications up to 48 hours later are also tracked to evaluate safety and effectiveness.