Oullins Pierre Benite

The number of patients with cancer receiving immunotherapy is growing, leading to new and unexpected side effects called immune-related adverse events (irAE) that can affect various organs. Managing these side effects requires a specialized, multidisciplinary approach and a professional network to provide timely and effective care. The study aims to create a comprehensive clinical and biological database called IMMUCARE-BASE to collect information on patients treated with anticancer immunotherapy, helping identify factors that increase the risk of toxicity and improve prevention and treatment strategies. Participants in this study will have their clinical data collected along with biological samples such as blood, plasma, serum, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells before treatment, during treatment, and if irAEs occur. The study includes patients starting immunotherapy alone or combined with other cancer treatments, with some eligibility for those who received immunotherapy previously more than six months ago. This database will support future personalized immunotherapy treatments based on individual benefits and risks. During the study, researchers will monitor the incidence of irAEs of all grades and organs over a period of 10 years. They will gather detailed clinical and biological data to understand mechanisms causing toxicity and to develop research programs focused on immunotherapy safety. The study involves ongoing follow-up and collection of samples to help improve care and anticipate adverse effects for patients receiving immunotherapy.

Researchers are studying advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that has returned after prior adjuvant therapy. The trial aims to find out if treatment with belzutifan and zanzalintinib helps patients live longer and delays disease progression compared to treatment with cabozantinib. This is a Phase 3 randomized study focusing on participants with recurrent advanced RCC who have previously received anti-PD-1/L1 therapy. Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of two oral drug regimens: either belzutifan combined with zanzalintinib, both taken once daily, or cabozantinib alone, also taken once daily. The study compares these treatments to assess their effects on disease control and overall survival. During the study, participants will be monitored for progression-free survival and overall survival for up to approximately 73 months. Researchers will evaluate how well the cancer responds to treatment and track any changes in health status over time. Safety and effectiveness of the treatments will be closely followed throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd) alone or combined with other treatments in people with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study aims to understand how well patients tolerate the treatment, find a safe dose for combining I-DXd with other drugs, and measure prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels during treatment. The study is part of a larger master screening protocol and includes patients with confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma who have progressive disease despite prior therapies. Participants receive treatments including I-DXd given through intravenous infusion, sometimes combined with other drugs such as docetaxel (IV), MK-5684, abiraterone, or enzalutamide (all oral). Before each I-DXd dose, patients take premedication to prevent nausea and vomiting. The study includes both a safety lead-in phase and an efficacy phase, with ongoing monitoring for side effects and tolerability. The combination therapies are carefully dosed and scheduled according to the study protocol. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments to monitor side effects, measure PSA response, and track any dose-limiting toxicities. Safety is closely followed, particularly during the first 21 days for combination treatments, and throughout up to 54 months for long-term outcomes. Researchers also observe if participants discontinue treatment due to adverse events. The study requires ongoing visits and evaluations to ensure participant health and collect data on treatment effects over time.

Researchers are evaluating molnupiravir, a study medicine designed to stop the COVID-19 virus from multiplying, to see if it can prevent severe illness from COVID-19 more effectively than a placebo. This Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study focuses on non-hospitalized adults at high risk of severe disease progression due to COVID-19. The study addresses the need for alternative treatments for people who cannot take certain COVID-19 medications due to availability or potential drug interactions. Participants will receive either molnupiravir or a placebo, both given orally as two 400 mg film-coated tablets every 12 hours for 5 days, totaling 10 doses. Some participants may also receive remdesivir as part of standard care if clinically appropriate and available. The study compares the effects of molnupiravir with placebo in preventing severe illness outcomes. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for outcomes such as hospitalization, death, or medically attended visits related to COVID-19 up to 29 days. Safety is assessed by tracking adverse events for up to about 5 months and discontinuation of study treatment due to adverse events for about 5 days. The study involves laboratory tests, symptom assessments, and safety evaluations to understand molnupiravir's impact on disease progression and participant health.

Researchers are evaluating the experimental antibody COM701 in participants with relapsed platinum sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC). This trial aims to find out if COM701, given as a maintenance treatment, can delay the progression of ovarian cancer, delay the need for new anti-cancer treatments, and to assess its safety. The study is part of an adaptive-platform trial with multiple sub-studies, focusing initially on COM701 alone compared to a placebo. Participants are randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to receive either a placebo or COM701 via intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. The trial includes a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design for the first sub-study. Future sub-studies will explore COM701 combined with other anti-cancer drugs. During the study, participants will visit the clinic every three weeks for treatment and monitoring. Health checks include physical exams, vital signs, ECGs, blood and urine tests, and pregnancy tests if applicable. Disease response will be assessed with CT or MRI scans and tumor marker tests using tumor tissue samples. The primary measure is progression-free survival, tracking time from randomization until disease progression or death, assessed up to two years.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of IMP1734, a PARP1 selective inhibitor, in participants with advanced solid tumors. The study aims to assess preliminary efficacy and find the best dosing for future clinical development. This first-in-human trial is conducted in two parts, focusing on patients with recurrent, advanced, or metastatic solid tumors including metastatic prostate, ovarian, breast, and other solid tumors with specific genetic mutations. The trial has two main phases: Part 1 involves dose escalation of IMP1734 as a monotherapy to determine the maximum tolerated or achievable dose in solid tumors. Part 2 focuses on dose optimization to select the optimal dose for further clinical use. Treatment involves oral administration of IMP1734, with dose escalation steps and combination dose escalations in specific cancers like metastatic prostate cancer, ovarian, and breast cancer. Participants will undergo regular assessments to monitor safety through adverse event tracking, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations, and tumor response measurements using criteria like RECIST1.1, CA125, or PSA. The study includes monitoring for serious adverse events from consent until 30 plus 7 days after the last dose. Dose-limiting toxicities are assessed during the first treatment cycle. Participants are expected to have adequate organ function, a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks, and will be followed closely during the trial to evaluate the drug's safety and potential anti-tumor activity.

This research aims to collect long-term safety and effectiveness data for participants treated with ibrutinib, a medicine used for various blood cancers and conditions including Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Follicular Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma, Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia, and Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease. It also provides ongoing access to ibrutinib for participants who have completed previous ibrutinib studies, continue treatment, and benefit from it. This is an open-label Phase 3b study without formal hypothesis testing. Participants will continue their current ibrutinib dosing regimen from the prior study, taken orally once daily as capsules in doses of 560 mg, 420 mg, 280 mg, or 140 mg, around the same time each day. Treatment continues until the investigator decides the participant no longer benefits due to disease progression or side effects, the participant withdraws, alternative ibrutinib access becomes available, or the study ends. Participants not able to access ibrutinib elsewhere can keep receiving the single-agent ibrutinib until all transition or stop treatment, or until the study is stopped. During the study, safety is monitored throughout and summarized, and effectiveness may be analyzed together with previous study data. The main outcome measured is the number of participants experiencing any adverse events within 30 days after the last dose or until starting another cancer treatment. Participants will undergo assessments including pregnancy testing and investigator evaluations to ensure ongoing benefit and safety. The study duration depends on when participants stop treatment or transition to other access.

Researchers are evaluating whether the drugs retatrutide and tirzepatide can prevent major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) in adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) who are at high risk. This Phase 3 trial enrolls about 4,500 adults with MASLD identified by non-invasive tests indicating an increased likelihood of developing serious liver problems. The study aims to understand how these treatments might affect liver health over time compared to a placebo. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either retatrutide, tirzepatide, or a placebo, all given by subcutaneous injection. The study will last approximately 224 weeks, during which participants may attend 25 to 30 clinic visits for monitoring and assessment. After the main study, eligible participants can join an optional 2-year extension where all will receive either retatrutide or tirzepatide regardless of their original group. Throughout the trial, participants’ liver function and disease progression will be closely monitored through various health assessments. Researchers will track the time to the first major adverse liver event as the main outcome. Safety and health status will be evaluated regularly during clinic visits, ensuring thorough observation over the long study period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, how the body processes, and effectiveness of TERN-701, a selective allosteric inhibitor targeting BCR-ABL1, in adults with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) who have been previously treated. The study is divided into two parts: Part 1 focuses on dose escalation to find safe dosage levels, and Part 2 involves randomized dose expansion to further assess the chosen doses and includes a mutation cohort for participants with certain resistance mutations. Participants in both parts will take TERN-701 orally once daily in 28-day cycles. Part 1 involves sequential dose escalation cohorts, while Part 2 evaluates two recommended dose levels selected from Part 1. The mutation cohort (Part 2m) will assess a specific 500 mg dose in participants with particular resistance mutations. Scheduled visits occur frequently during the first treatment cycle and then regularly throughout the study to monitor treatment effects. During the study, participants will have regular visits for evaluations including safety checks and laboratory tests. Researchers will measure dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events, hematologic response, molecular response, and changes in BCR-ABL1 transcript levels up to three years. The trial plans to enroll about 180 participants, with up to 80 in Part 1, about 80 in Part 2, and around 20 in the mutation cohort. All participants will receive the active treatment throughout the study duration.

Researchers are studying bleximenib, an investigational drug taken orally, to find the best dose for treating acute leukemia and to evaluate its safety and effectiveness. In Phase 1, they aim to identify the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) through a dose escalation and expansion process. Phase 2 will focus on assessing how well bleximenib works at the recommended dose in participants with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia, particularly those with specific genetic alterations in KMT2A, NPM1, or NUP98/NUP214. The study involves administering bleximenib orally and includes different participant groups based on age and disease status. Phase 1 includes pediatric participants aged 2 to less than 18 years and adults 18 years and older with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia who have limited treatment options. Phase 2 focuses on adults over 18 with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia harboring KMT2A or NPM1 mutations. The trial monitors participants for dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events, and treatment tolerability over periods lasting up to nearly five years. Participants will undergo evaluations of safety, including the number and severity of adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities during the first cycle. The effectiveness measure in Phase 2 is the rate of complete remission or remission with partial blood count recovery. Throughout the study, participants will be assessed using laboratory tests, performance status scales, and pregnancy tests as applicable. Safety monitoring and long-term follow-up will continue for up to 4 years and 9 months to fully evaluate treatment effects and tolerability.