Ede

This research investigates treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer mCRPC focusing on a drug called ifinatamab deruxtecan I-DXd. The study aims to assess the safety, how well participants tolerate the treatments, and appropriate dosing levels of I-DXd alone or combined with other therapies. Researchers will also monitor participants prostate specific antigen PSA levels during treatment to understand its effects. Participants are assigned to one of several treatment groups. One group receives docetaxel every three weeks for up to 10 cycles. Other groups receive I-DXd alone or combined with either opevesostat or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors such as abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide. I-DXd is given every three weeks until unacceptable side effects, disease progression, death, or withdrawal, while the other drugs continue until specific discontinuation criteria are met. Premedication is required before each I-DXd dose to prevent nausea and vomiting. Throughout the study, participants undergo various assessments including monitoring of dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events, and PSA response rates. Researchers also track objective response rates, progression-free survival, overall survival, and other clinical outcomes over up to approximately 54 months. The study involves regular evaluations to assess safety and treatment effects until study completion.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 at levels of 1% or higher. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study aims to compare these treatments to improve outcomes for this patient group. Participants will receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab, each given intravenously on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle, combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy either carboplatin or cisplatin also given on Day 1 of each cycle for up to four cycles. After chemotherapy cycles, patients continue with rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab monotherapy combined with pemetrexed maintenance. The study follows patients for up to approximately six years to monitor treatment effects and safety. During the study, participants undergo assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size, blood tests to evaluate organ function, and questionnaires about symptoms and quality of life. Researchers monitor overall survival and progression-free survival as primary outcomes, alongside other measures such as response duration and physical functioning. Safety is closely observed throughout, with study visits scheduled regularly during treatment and follow-up periods, lasting up to six years in total.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig combined with platinum-based chemotherapy compared to pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as a first treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer mNSCLC whose tumors express programmed death-ligand 1 PD-L1. This Phase III global study focuses on patients with PD-L1 tumor cell expression of 1% or higher and aims to determine which treatment provides better overall and progression-free survival. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two study groups one group will receive rilvegostomig plus carboplatin and either paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy, while the other group will receive pembrolizumab plus the same chemotherapy options. Rilvegostomig and pembrolizumab are both given intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, with chemotherapy given up to 4 cycles. Nab-paclitaxel may be administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Treatment continues with rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab until disease progression or other criteria are met. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor response, laboratory tests to monitor organ function, and patient questionnaires about physical function and quality of life. Researchers will track overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, and duration of response for up to approximately 6 years. Safety and immune response to rilvegostomig will also be evaluated. Participants will be closely monitored throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of a new medicine called NNC0487-0111 in people who have Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction HFpEF or Heart Failure with mildly reduced Ejection Fraction HFmrEF and excess body weight. This phase 3 clinical trial aims to find out if NNC0487-0111 is safe and effective for treating these conditions compared to a placebo. Participants have HFpEF or HFmrEF and a body mass index of 30 or above. The study is sponsored by Novo Nordisk AS and uses a randomized, quadruple-masked design. Participants will receive either NNC0487-0111 or a matching placebo by injection under the skin once a week. The NNC0487-0111 is given in increasing doses over time. The study is parallel in design, meaning participants are randomly assigned to one of the two groups and receive that treatment throughout the trial. This treatment period extends for up to about 165 weeks. The study evaluates the time to certain heart failure events, hospitalizations, cardiovascular deaths, and other major cardiovascular events. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess heart failure outcomes and kidney function, as well as quality of life using questionnaires like the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Safety and effectiveness are assessed through hospital visits, heart failure event tracking, and blood tests including kidney function and blood sugar levels. The total participation spans over three years, with ongoing evaluations to measure the time to heart failure events and cardiovascular outcomes. Participants receive close medical monitoring throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of combining calderasib with pembrolizumab as the first treatment for people with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC that has a specific KRAS G12C mutation and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or higher. The study compares this combination to pembrolizumab with a placebo to see if it improves the time participants live without the cancer worsening and overall survival. Participants receive pembrolizumab through an intravenous infusion every 21 days for up to 35 cycles. They also take calderasib or a matching placebo by mouth daily until they meet criteria to stop treatment. The study is randomized and double-blind, meaning neither participants nor researchers know who receives calderasib or placebo. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor cancer progression, overall survival, response rate, and quality of life measures through questionnaires. Safety will be closely monitored by tracking adverse events and treatment discontinuations. The study may last up to about 56 months, including follow-up to observe long-term outcomes and quality of life changes.

This research aims to compare the effects of oral anticoagulation versus no anticoagulation in patients aged 55 and older who have had recent episodes of transient atrial fibrillation triggered by stress and have additional factors that increase their risk of stroke. The study is a multinational, investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, open-label trial evaluating the impact of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants NOACs on preventing stroke and other serious cardiovascular events. Participants will be randomly assigned to either receive one of several NOACs, such as edoxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban, prescribed by their physician for the duration of the follow-up, or to a control group that will not receive anticoagulants unless medically indicated during the study. The choice of specific NOAC and dose adjustments are determined by the prescribing doctor. The study excludes patients with certain conditions like chronic atrial fibrillation, severe kidney or liver disease, recent cardiac surgery, or bleeding risks. During the study, participants will be monitored for up to 24 months to assess the occurrence of non-hemorrhagic stroke, systemic embolism, vascular mortality, myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial thrombosis, amputation, and venous thromboembolism. Regular follow-up will include evaluation of these outcomes to measure the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation compared to no anticoagulation. Participants will provide informed consent and remain under medical supervision throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of muvalaplin in lowering cardiovascular risks among adults with elevated lipoproteina who either have atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or are at risk of a first heart attack or stroke. This phase 3, randomized, double-blind study aims to investigate whether muvalaplin can reduce major adverse cardiovascular events compared to placebo in this high-risk population. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either muvalaplin or a placebo, both given orally. The study is designed with parallel groups and will last about 5.25 years, during which the occurrence of cardiovascular events and changes in lipoproteina levels will be closely monitored. Throughout the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including measurement of lipoproteina levels, monitoring of cardiovascular events such as heart attacks or strokes, and evaluation of healthcare resource use. The primary outcome is the time to first major adverse cardiac event, tracked from baseline until the study ends. Safety and pharmacokinetics of muvalaplin will also be evaluated during the trial period.

Researchers are studying patients with non-metastatic stage II colon cancer who are part of the Dutch ColoRectal Cancer cohort PLCRC and who consented to additional blood samples. The study aims to evaluate how many patients with detectable circulating tumor DNA ctDNA after surgery begin adjuvant chemotherapy. This observational and interventional trial includes patients who do not have a standard indication for chemotherapy and involves a randomized design to compare ctDNA-guided treatment with standard care. Patients are randomly assigned to one of two groups the ctDNA-based treatment group or the standard care group. In the ctDNA group, blood samples taken after surgery are analyzed for ctDNA. Those with detectable ctDNA are offered 3 months of adjuvant chemotherapy using CAPOX a combination of fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin. Patients without detectable ctDNA receive routine follow-up care. The standard care group receives routine follow-up without knowledge of their ctDNA results. Participants will have blood collected before surgery, after surgery, and during follow-up. Researchers will monitor who starts chemotherapy within 8 to 12 weeks after surgery and will track recurrence rates, disease-free survival, overall survival, time to recurrence, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness over several years. Follow-up assessments occur up to 10 years, allowing detailed long-term evaluation of treatment impact and patient outcomes.

Researchers are investigating how to increase dietary fiber intake before surgery in adults with colorectal cancer. This randomized controlled trial aims to explore whether personalized digital dietary advice or a dried vegetable product can help patients increase their fiber intake compared to continuing their habitual diet. The goal is to assess the feasibility of these methods before larger studies are conducted, focusing on improving outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups one receiving personalized dietary advice through an online tool tailored to their eating habits, another consuming two daily sachets of dried chicory root cubes providing natural fiber, and a control group maintaining their usual diet. The intervention spans the period between diagnosis and surgery, typically around four weeks but varying depending on individual patient factors and scheduling. During the study, participants will provide dietary recalls at baseline, mid-intervention after two weeks, and at the end. Researchers will assess changes in fiber intake, stool patterns, gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life, and fecal and plasma microbial metabolites. They will also monitor fecal microbiota composition and track length of hospital stay up to 90 days after surgery. This comprehensive evaluation aims to support future studies on dietary fibers role in surgical outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating chemotherapy dosing strategies in older patients aged 70 years and above who have metastatic colorectal cancer and are eligible for first-line palliative chemotherapy. This phase III randomized controlled trial aims to compare upfront dose-reduced chemotherapy with standard full-dose chemotherapy, focusing on progression-free survival PFS. Patients are assessed using the Geriatric 8 G8 questionnaire to determine their risk of chemotherapy toxicity, which guides treatment assignment. The study seeks to balance treatment effectiveness with minimizing toxicity, hospital admissions, and maintaining quality of life QoL and physical functioning. Participants classified as low risk for toxicity G8 score 15 or higher are randomized to receive either doublet chemotherapy a fluoropyrimidine combined with oxaliplatin at full dose or with a 25% dose reduction upfront. Those at high risk G8 score 14 or lower or judged high risk by their oncologist receive fluoropyrimidine monotherapy either at full dose or with a 25% dose reduction. The study also allows the addition of targeted treatments like bevacizumab or EGFR inhibitors. Dose adjustments are made for patients with moderate kidney impairment. Chemotherapy is given orally or intravenously on schedules varying between every two and three weeks, depending on the regimen. Participants will be closely monitored throughout treatment, with assessments including radiological or clinical evaluations for disease progression, quality of life and physical functioning questionnaires at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and tracking of chemotherapy toxicity, overall survival, treatment cycles, dose changes, hospital admissions, and cumulative drug dosage. Safety and cost-effectiveness will also be evaluated over an average study duration of eight months and up to one year for some outcomes. The study plans to include 587 patients and will continue until December 2028.