Eindhoven

This research aims to evaluate whether creating dedicated HIV teams in hospitals across ten European countries can increase HIV testing rates among patients showing signs of HIV-related conditions. The study uses a stepped-wedge design, where hospitals switch from routine care to the new intervention in sequence. This approach compares outcomes before and after the teams are in place, helping to understand the impact of the intervention across various locations and medical specialties. The intervention involves establishing local HIV teams led by specialists and supported by nurses and data experts. These teams identify patients needing HIV tests through electronic health records, provide feedback to doctors to encourage testing, offer education to healthcare staff about HIV, reduce stigma, and improve connections to prevention and care services. This program integrates smoothly into regular hospital routines and aims to close gaps in HIV diagnosis. Participants HIV testing rates will be monitored by reviewing records before and after the intervention. Researchers will also assess new HIV diagnoses, changes in testing patterns by country and specialty, and healthcare professionals knowledge and attitudes toward HIV. The study includes ongoing evaluation of how well the teams operate, resource use, and cost-effectiveness. Data collection extends up to several years to observe long-term effects, with continuous monitoring of care access and prevention services.

Young adults aged 18 to 25 who experience frequent thoughts about killing themselves are the focus of this study, which evaluates the cost-effectiveness of Attachment Based Family Therapy ABFT compared to Treatment As Usual TAU. Suicide is a leading cause of death among young adults, and current treatments have limited success. This trial aims to determine if involving family through ABFT can better reduce suicidality and improve outcomes, informing clinical guidelines and care practices in Belgium and the Netherlands. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups the experimental group receives ABFT as an add-on to TAU, which includes treatments like antidepressants, CBT, or DBT, with weekly ABFT sessions lasting about 16 weeks. The control group receives TAU alone, allowing up to four sessions of systemic family therapy. ABFT focuses on strengthening parent-child attachment bonds to provide a supportive base for young adults, involving parents or caregivers actively in therapy. Throughout the study, suicidality is measured at baseline, immediately after intervention, and at follow-ups 3, 6, and 12 months post-intervention using tools like the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire Junior. Researchers also assess depressive symptoms, family functioning, attachment, quality of life, and healthcare costs. The trial includes 138 participants across multiple sites, with double-blind randomized allocation. Safety, adherence, and cost-effectiveness are closely monitored during and after the treatment period.

Researchers are studying a new type of scan called FAPI-PETCT to see how well it detects metastases in patients with advanced gastric cancer. The study aims to find out if this scan can better identify cancer spread, leading to changes in treatment plans such as avoiding unnecessary surgeries or shifting to comfort-focused care. It also evaluates whether the scan causes less burden for patients compared to current methods. Participants will receive the standard care for gastric cancer and undergo one additional FAPI-PETCT scan, where a small amount of 18F-FAPI-74 is given intravenously about 60 minutes before a PETCT scan lasting around 20 minutes. The results from this scan will help doctors decide on further tests or surgery needed. The study monitors changes in diagnosis and treatment decisions based on the scan. During the study, participants will complete questionnaires taking about 4 hours total and spend approximately 2 hours for the extra scan. Researchers will measure outcomes such as changes in treatment intent, diagnostic work-up, scan accuracy, incidental findings, patient burden, quality of life, and safety over about one year. Follow-up includes quality of life assessments and cost evaluations at multiple time points after staging.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of a new medicine called CagriSema in helping adults living with obesity, with or without type 2 diabetes, to lose weight. This phase 3 clinical study compares two different weekly doses of CagriSema against an existing medicine, semaglutide. The study aims to understand how well these treatments support weight loss over a long period. Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to receive one of three treatments CagriSema at dose level 1, CagriSema at dose level 2, or semaglutide. Each treatment is given by weekly injection under the skin for 72 weeks. The study lasts about 83 weeks, covering treatment and follow-up periods to observe effects and safety. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor body weight, body mass index BMI, waist size, cholesterol levels, blood sugar control HbA1c, and quality of life. Researchers will track changes from the start of treatment to the end of 72 weeks, including weight loss milestones and health measurements. Safety will also be closely monitored through reports of any adverse events until the study ends.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of a new medicine called NNC0487-0111 in people who have Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction HFpEF or Heart Failure with mildly reduced Ejection Fraction HFmrEF and excess body weight. This phase 3 clinical trial aims to find out if NNC0487-0111 is safe and effective for treating these conditions compared to a placebo. Participants have HFpEF or HFmrEF and a body mass index of 30 or above. The study is sponsored by Novo Nordisk AS and uses a randomized, quadruple-masked design. Participants will receive either NNC0487-0111 or a matching placebo by injection under the skin once a week. The NNC0487-0111 is given in increasing doses over time. The study is parallel in design, meaning participants are randomly assigned to one of the two groups and receive that treatment throughout the trial. This treatment period extends for up to about 165 weeks. The study evaluates the time to certain heart failure events, hospitalizations, cardiovascular deaths, and other major cardiovascular events. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess heart failure outcomes and kidney function, as well as quality of life using questionnaires like the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Safety and effectiveness are assessed through hospital visits, heart failure event tracking, and blood tests including kidney function and blood sugar levels. The total participation spans over three years, with ongoing evaluations to measure the time to heart failure events and cardiovascular outcomes. Participants receive close medical monitoring throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating elacestrant compared to standard endocrine therapies in adults with node-positive, Estrogen Receptor-positive ER, HER2-negative early breast cancer who are at high risk of cancer returning. The study focuses on those who have had prior endocrine therapy and aims to measure how well elacestrant may prevent invasive breast cancer recurrence over five years. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either 345 mg of elacestrant daily for five years or continue their prior standard endocrine therapy, which may include an aromatase inhibitor anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane or tamoxifen. The trial is open-label, meaning both participants and researchers know which treatment is given. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor cancer recurrence, survival, side effects, and quality of life. Evaluations include questionnaires on health status and physical functioning at baseline, six months, and annually for up to five years. Safety is tracked through adverse event reporting up to five years plus 28 days. The total participation duration can last up to five years with ongoing monitoring and data collection.

Researchers are evaluating orforglipron to measure its effects on cardiovascular outcomes in adults aged 50 and older who have atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease ASCVD andor chronic kidney disease CKD. This phase 3 study aims to compare orforglipron with a placebo to better understand its impact on major cardiovascular events over about five years. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either orforglipron orally along with standard care or a placebo orally along with standard care. The study is double-blinded, meaning neither participants nor researchers will know who receives the active drug or placebo during the trial period. During the study, participants will be followed for around five years, with researchers monitoring the time to the first major cardiovascular event and additional outcomes such as cardiovascular and kidney events, changes in kidney function measured by eGFR, and the onset of type 2 diabetes. The study includes regular assessments to track these outcomes and ensure participant safety throughout the long-term follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating sacituzumab tirumotecan alone and in combination with pembrolizumab compared to treatment chosen by the physician in participants with hormone receptor positivehuman epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative HRHER2- breast cancer that is locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic. The study aims to see if these treatments improve progression-free survival compared to standard physician-chosen therapies. This is a Phase 3 clinical trial assessing advanced breast cancer treatments. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups sacituzumab tirumotecan alone given by intravenous infusion every two weeks until disease progression or discontinuation sacituzumab tirumotecan plus pembrolizumab with sacituzumab tirumotecan given every two weeks and pembrolizumab given every six weeks for up to about two years or treatment chosen by the physician, which may include various chemotherapy options such as paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, capecitabine, or liposomal doxorubicin, administered with schedules depending on the drug. Treatments continue until disease progression or discontinuation. During the study, participants will have regular assessments including imaging to evaluate progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, and quality of life measures using questionnaires. Safety is monitored by tracking adverse events and treatment discontinuations. The primary outcome is measured up to approximately 38 months, with additional secondary outcomes followed up to about 77 months. Participants are followed closely through study visits and evaluations throughout the trial period.

The trial investigates the use of left ventricular LV unloading via intra-aortic balloon pumping IABP to improve weaning success from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation VA ECMO in patients with cardiogenic shock. The study is part of the REMAP ECMO platform, which embeds multiple response adaptive randomized trials within a patient registry. This research aims to fill knowledge gaps about managing ECMO and related therapies, as current practices rely mostly on observational data and expert opinion. Patients are randomized to receive either VA ECMO support with LV unloading through IABP or VA ECMO alone without an unloading device. The IABP must be placed within 8 hours of ECMO initiation for those in the unloading arm. The study also includes a nested physiological substudy assessing the effects of IABP on respiratory and hemodynamic parameters, including microcirculation, macrocirculation, and the impact of positive end-expiratory pressure PEEP as an unloading method during decremental PEEP trials. Participants undergo a range of assessments including evaluation of ECMO weaning success at 30 days, mortality rates at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year, and various clinical parameters during ECMO support such as bleeding events, mechanical ventilation duration, heart function, and quality of life at one year. The physiological substudy collects detailed measurements like heart rate, pulmonary artery catheter data, echocardiography, microcirculation, respiratory parameters, and biomarkers at 24 and 48 hours after ECMO initiation. The study involves long-term follow-up up to one year and tracks health care costs and hospital readmissions.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of standard chemotherapy with or without the drug INCB161734 in participants who have metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma PDAC with a KRAS G12D mutation and have not received prior treatment for metastatic disease. This phase 3 study compares two groups to understand whether adding INCB161734 to chemotherapy improves outcomes in this condition. Participants will receive either oral INCB161734 tablets combined with chemotherapy chosen by their doctor either mFOLFIRINOX or GemNabP or a placebo tablet combined with the same chemotherapy options. The treatments are given according to the study protocol, and the study is conducted in a randomized, double-blind design to fairly compare the effects of INCB161734 plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy. During the study, participants will be monitored for overall survival, progression-free survival, and tumor response up to about two to three years. Researchers will also assess treatment side effects, quality of life using questionnaires, and other health outcomes. Participants will have regular visits for assessments, and safety will be closely tracked throughout the study period, which lasts until the study completion date in 2029.