Warszawa

This research aims to report how long patients scheduled for liver transplant fast from clear fluids before surgery. It also seeks to understand how the length of this fasting relates to changes in heart rate, blood pressure, blood glucose, blood lactate, and acid-base balance during different phases of anesthesia and transplant. The study focuses on liver transplant recipients in a prospective observational setting. Participants will be observed without specific interventions. Clear fluids include water, certain juices without pulp like apple or grape, clear sodas, tea or coffee without milk or cream, clear broth, sports drinks, gelatin, and popsicles without fruit pulp or yogurt. The study measures fasting duration and monitors vital signs and metabolic markers during anesthesia and transplant procedures. During the study, participants' fasting times will be recorded, and researchers will monitor blood pressure, heart rate, blood glucose, blood lactate, and acid-base balance at various anesthesia and transplant phases. The main outcome measure is the duration of fasting from clear fluids before anesthesia induction. Participants will be adults undergoing elective liver transplant, and their involvement includes preoperative assessment and monitoring during surgery.

Researchers are investigating whether sexual activity affects the risk of low blood sugar (hypoglycemia) in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who use insulin therapy and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Many people with diabetes worry about hypoglycemia during or after sexual activity, which can impact their quality of life and willingness to be intimate. This study addresses the gap in research caused by the sensitive nature of sexual health and the previous lack of tools to remotely monitor glucose levels. Participants will use CGM systems such as LibreView or Dexcom Clarity to track glucose changes during and up to six hours after sexual activity. They will mark the start of sexual activity in their CGM app using a neutral icon like a heart. The study is observational, so participants continue their usual insulin therapy and self-care. Data from days with and without sexual activity will be compared over a three-month period for each participant. During the study, participants will be observed for three months while researchers collect glucose data and sexual activity markers remotely and securely. Healthcare providers will also provide basic clinical information. The primary outcome is the proportion of sexual activity episodes linked to hypoglycemia, defined as glucose levels below 70 mg/dL during or after sexual activity. The study aims to include 100 adults and hopes to provide evidence to guide future care recommendations or reduce fears related to sexual activity and hypoglycemia.

Researchers are evaluating whether the introduction of dedicated hospital-based HIV teams can improve HIV testing rates among patients with HIV indicator conditions across ten European countries. This real-world, multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster randomized effectiveness-implementation trial spans four years and involves hospitals in the Netherlands, Belgium, United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Romania, Poland, and Ukraine. The study aims to address the current gap in HIV testing and improve early diagnosis by comparing testing rates before and after the implementation of HIV teams. The intervention involves creating local HIV teams led by HIV specialists, supported by nurses and data collectors. These teams focus on auditing and providing feedback to healthcare professionals to encourage HIV testing when indicated, reducing stigma, educating staff on HIV prevention and care, and improving linkage to local prevention services. The HIV teams use electronic health records to identify patients with HIV indicator conditions and integrate their activities into routine hospital care. Participants' data are collected retrospectively from routine care and prospectively at the healthcare professional level. Researchers measure changes in HIV testing rates, new HIV diagnoses, and variations across countries and specialties. They also assess the HIV diagnosis and care cascade, healthcare professionals' knowledge and stigma levels, and implementation outcomes such as resource use and cost-effectiveness. Monitoring includes feedback loops and evaluation of barriers and facilitators to implementation, aiming to improve HIV testing and care sustainability in hospitals.

Researchers are evaluating remibrutinib (LOU064) in adolescents aged 12 to under 18 years who have chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) that is not well controlled by H1-antihistamines. This Phase 3 trial aims to assess the effectiveness, how the drug is processed in the body, and safety of remibrutinib compared to a placebo. The study also intends to gather long-term data on how well remibrutinib works and its safety over several years after treatment ends. The trial includes three periods. First, the core period is a 24-week double-blind phase where about two-thirds of participants receive remibrutinib and one-third receive placebo, with about 10 site visits over approximately 32 weeks. Next is an optional open-label extension lasting from one to three years, where participants who completed the core period may receive remibrutinib or enter an observational treatment-free phase depending on their symptoms. Participants may cycle through treatment and observational periods up to six times. Finally, an optional long-term treatment-free follow-up can last up to three years with one site visit and up to four phone calls. During the study, participants undergo assessments including changes in urticaria activity scores (UAS7), itching severity (ISS7), and hive severity (HSS7) measured from baseline to 12 weeks. Regular visits monitor safety, symptoms, and drug effects. The study tracks these measures to understand remibrutinib's impact on CSU symptoms and overall safety profile during and after treatment, with total participation potentially lasting several years.

Researchers are assessing the safety and effects of Ritlecitinib, a study medicine, for treating hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), a condition causing long-lasting, painful red skin lumps. This phase 2 study focuses on adults with moderate to severe HS who have not responded well to or cannot tolerate antibiotics. The goal is to compare experiences and outcomes between those receiving Ritlecitinib and those receiving a placebo. Participants will be randomly assigned to take either Ritlecitinib or a placebo pill once daily at home. The treatment involves an initial loading dose of Ritlecitinib for 8 weeks, followed by an 8-week maintenance dose, totaling 16 weeks of treatment. The placebo group will receive a matching pill with no active medicine. Over approximately 24 weeks, including screening and follow-up, participants will attend around 10 clinic visits for health evaluations, including physical exams, blood and urine tests, vital signs, chest X-rays, ECGs, hearing tests, and questionnaires. They will also track their medication intake and HS symptoms daily using an electronic diary on a mobile phone. The study will measure how many patients achieve at least a 50% improvement in HS symptoms by week 16 to evaluate treatment response and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of delgocitinib cream 20 mg/g applied twice daily compared to a cream vehicle in treating adults with mild to severe palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP). This phase 2a, double-blind, two-arm trial focuses on adults diagnosed with PPP, a condition characterized by persistent pustules on the palms and/or soles, lasting more than three months. The study aims to assess skin improvement using the PPP Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) and other clinical evaluations over 16 weeks. Participants will be randomly assigned to apply either delgocitinib cream or the cream vehicle twice daily during a 16-week treatment period. The study involves approximately 9 visits over about 18 weeks in total. The trial is designed to compare the two treatments' effects on PPP severity, with a thorough monitoring process throughout the study period. During the trial, participants will undergo clinical assessments including photographic evaluations to confirm PPP diagnosis, PPPASI scoring to measure skin improvement, and physician global assessments. Safety and treatment adherence will be closely monitored. The main outcome measure is the number of participants achieving at least a 75% improvement in PPPASI score from baseline at week 16. The study also includes safety checks and follow-up to ensure participant well-being throughout the trial.

This research aims to evaluate the effects of litifilimab (BIIB059), a monoclonal antibody, in adults with active subacute or chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Participants have active skin symptoms of CLE that have not improved with antimalarial therapy or had difficulties continuing that treatment. The study focuses on reducing skin disease activity using several scores including CLA-IGA-R and CLASI, while also assessing safety, immune response, and quality of life. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either litifilimab or a placebo injection under the skin every four weeks during a 24-week double-blind period where neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given. After this, all participants will receive litifilimab injections every four weeks for an additional 28 weeks. Those who complete the treatment may join a long-term extension study or enter a follow-up safety period lasting up to 24 weeks. Total participation may last up to 80 weeks. Throughout the study, researchers will monitor skin disease activity using the CLA-IGA-R erythema score and the CLASI-A activity score to see how many participants improve. They will also assess safety, tolerability, immune system effects, and participants' quality of life using questionnaires. These evaluations occur regularly during both treatment periods and follow-up to understand the impact of litifilimab on CLE symptoms and overall health.

Researchers are studying advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that has returned after prior adjuvant therapy. The trial aims to find out if treatment with belzutifan and zanzalintinib helps patients live longer and delays disease progression compared to treatment with cabozantinib. This is a Phase 3 randomized study focusing on participants with recurrent advanced RCC who have previously received anti-PD-1/L1 therapy. Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of two oral drug regimens: either belzutifan combined with zanzalintinib, both taken once daily, or cabozantinib alone, also taken once daily. The study compares these treatments to assess their effects on disease control and overall survival. During the study, participants will be monitored for progression-free survival and overall survival for up to approximately 73 months. Researchers will evaluate how well the cancer responds to treatment and track any changes in health status over time. Safety and effectiveness of the treatments will be closely followed throughout the study period.

Researchers are studying whether calderasib alone or combined with cetuximab can treat advanced solid tumors in people who have the KRAS G12C mutation. This phase 2, open-label trial aims to find out how many participants respond to these treatments and to compare their safety and tolerability. Participants receive calderasib by mouth and cetuximab through intravenous infusion. The study includes people with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors other than colorectal cancer, who have already undergone standard treatments. The trial monitors response and side effects over time as participants receive either calderasib alone or in combination with cetuximab. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments to measure tumor response and track any side effects or adverse events. Researchers record how many people experience treatment-related side effects and how many stop treatment due to these effects. The study follows participants for up to approximately 76 months to assess long-term outcomes and safety.

Researchers are evaluating a new treatment called ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd) for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study compares I-DXd to chemotherapy to see if it helps people live longer overall and live longer without their cancer worsening. It is a Phase 3, open-label trial focused on patients who have progressed on prior therapies and have evidence of metastatic disease. Participants receive either I-DXd through an intravenous infusion every 3 weeks or docetaxel chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. Prednisone tablets are also given daily as part of the treatment plan. Before each I-DXd dose, premedication is provided to help prevent nausea and vomiting using a combination of drugs such as corticosteroids and anti-nausea medicines. Treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or other reasons to stop. During the study, researchers monitor overall survival and how long patients live without their cancer progressing, for up to about 36 months. Participants undergo tumor tissue collection, scans, and assessments to track disease status and side effects. Safety is closely watched throughout treatment. The study includes men aged 18 and older with confirmed prostate cancer and metastatic disease who have previously received certain hormone therapies but no prior taxane chemotherapy for mCRPC.