Warszawa

This research aims to understand how long patients who are scheduled for liver transplants fast from clear fluids before surgery. It also examines how this fasting period might relate to changes in blood pressure, heart rate, and metabolic factors like blood glucose, lactate levels, and acid-base balance during different stages of anesthesia and transplantation. The study is observational and seeks to answer important questions about fasting and patient responses in liver transplant recipients. Participants are liver transplant recipients undergoing elective liver transplantation at the University Clinical Center of Medical University of Warsaw. The study observes patients without introducing any new treatments or interventions. Clear fluids include water, certain pulp-free juices, clear sodas, tea or coffee without milk or cream, clear broth, sports drinks, gelatin, and popsicles without pulp or yogurt. During the study, researchers will collect data on the duration of fasting from clear fluids before anesthesia and monitor vital signs and metabolic markers throughout anesthesia and transplant phases. The main outcome measured is the fasting duration before anesthesia induction. Participants care continues as usual, and the study does not alter their treatment. Participation involves observation and data collection only, lasting from before surgery through the transplant process.

This research aims to understand if sexual activity affects the risk of low blood sugar hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who use insulin therapy and continuous glucose monitoring CGM. Sexual health is important but often overlooked in diabetes care, and fear of hypoglycemia during or after sexual activity may reduce quality of life. The study addresses this gap using new remote monitoring technology to study glucose changes related to sexual activity. Participants will use CGM systems like LibreView or Dexcom Clarity to track glucose levels during and up to 6 hours after sexual activity, which they mark in their CGM app using a neutral symbol. The study is observational with no assigned treatments participants continue their usual insulin therapy and self-management. Each person will be observed for 3 months, comparing glucose data from sexual activity days to days without sexual activity. During the study, researchers will collect glucose data remotely and receive basic clinical information from healthcare providers. They will analyze the proportion of sexual activity episodes linked to hypoglycemia and compare frequency and mean glucose levels on days with and without sexual activity. Participants data are anonymized and securely handled. The study hopes to help reduce patient fears and guide future recommendations for safe sexual activity with insulin therapy.

This research aims to evaluate whether creating dedicated HIV teams in hospitals across ten European countries can increase HIV testing rates among patients showing signs of HIV-related conditions. The study uses a stepped-wedge design, where hospitals switch from routine care to the new intervention in sequence. This approach compares outcomes before and after the teams are in place, helping to understand the impact of the intervention across various locations and medical specialties. The intervention involves establishing local HIV teams led by specialists and supported by nurses and data experts. These teams identify patients needing HIV tests through electronic health records, provide feedback to doctors to encourage testing, offer education to healthcare staff about HIV, reduce stigma, and improve connections to prevention and care services. This program integrates smoothly into regular hospital routines and aims to close gaps in HIV diagnosis. Participants HIV testing rates will be monitored by reviewing records before and after the intervention. Researchers will also assess new HIV diagnoses, changes in testing patterns by country and specialty, and healthcare professionals knowledge and attitudes toward HIV. The study includes ongoing evaluation of how well the teams operate, resource use, and cost-effectiveness. Data collection extends up to several years to observe long-term effects, with continuous monitoring of care access and prevention services.

Researchers are evaluating the combination of CGT9486 and sunitinib compared to sunitinib alone in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors GIST. This Phase 3, open-label international trial involves multiple parts, including dose confirmation, drug interaction assessments, and efficacy comparisons. The study also includes substudies focusing on drug-drug interaction potential and first-line treatment in patients with specific genetic mutations KIT exon 9. Approximately 482 patients will participate across these parts.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of a medicine called Ritlecitinib for adults with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa HS, a condition that causes long-lasting painful red lumps on the skin. The study focuses on participants who have not responded well to or cannot tolerate antibiotics for HS. This Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to understand how Ritlecitinib compares to placebo in treating this condition. Participants will be randomly assigned to take either Ritlecitinib or a matching placebo by mouth once daily at home. The study includes a loading dose of Ritlecitinib for the first 8 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose for the next 8 weeks, totaling 16 weeks of treatment. The placebo group will follow the same schedule with a pill that looks like the study medicine but contains no active drug. Throughout the study, participants will have about 10 clinic visits over approximately 24 weeks, including screening, Day 1, and follow-ups every 1, 2, or 4 weeks until Week 16. At these visits, health status will be reviewed through physical exams, blood and urine tests, vital signs, chest X-rays, ECGs, hearing tests, and questionnaires. Participants will also record daily medication intake and HS symptoms using a mobile eDiary. Researchers will measure skin response and safety outcomes to assess the effects of the study medicine compared to placebo.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of delgocitinib cream 20 mgg applied twice daily compared to a cream vehicle in treating adults with mild to severe palmoplantar pustulosis PPP. This trial is a phase 2a, double-blind study focusing on this skin condition characterized by pustules on the palms and soles. The main goal is to see how well delgocitinib cream improves symptoms over a 16-week treatment period. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups one group will apply delgocitinib cream twice a day for 16 weeks, while the other group will use a matching vehicle cream twice daily for the same duration. The study includes a total of approximately 18 weeks for each participant, involving around 9 visits. The trial compares the active cream to the placebo cream to assess efficacy and safety. During the study, participants will attend scheduled visits to monitor their condition and collect data on skin symptoms, pustule counts, and quality of life measures. Researchers will assess the improvement in PPP severity using specific scales such as the PPP Area and Severity Index PPPASI. Safety is monitored through reports of any treatment-emergent side effects. Overall participation lasts about 18 weeks, including screening and treatment phases.

Researchers are evaluating new treatments for advanced renal cell carcinoma RCC, a type of kidney cancer. This study compares the effects of combining two targeted therapies, belzutifan and zanzalintinib, against belzutifan with a placebo. The goal is to see if the combination can help people live longer and prevent the cancer from getting worse after other treatments have failed. Participants will take 120 mg of belzutifan orally and either 60 mg of zanzalintinib or a matching placebo once daily for about 24 months. The study is randomized and double-blind, meaning neither participants nor researchers know who receives the active combination or placebo. Two groups are compared belzutifan plus zanzalintinib and belzutifan plus placebo. During the study, participants will be monitored for progression-free survival and overall survival, with assessments up to around 30 to 50 months. Researchers will also evaluate tumor response, duration of response, quality of life, and side effects. Safety and tolerability will be tracked throughout treatment and follow-up periods. The study is sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC and aims to provide important information on treating advanced RCC.

Researchers are investigating new treatments for advanced renal cell carcinoma RCC that has returned after prior therapy. The study aims to find out if the combination of belzutifan and zanzalintinib can help people with recurrent advanced RCC live longer without their cancer worsening compared to the drug cabozantinib. This is a phase 3 randomized trial evaluating these treatments in participants who have experienced recurrence during or after prior anti-PD-1L1 therapy. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either belzutifan plus zanzalintinib taken orally once daily or cabozantinib taken orally once daily. They continue their assigned treatment until certain reasons require stopping the study intervention. The study compares the effects of these treatments on cancer progression and survival among people with advanced RCC who have had disease recurrence after adjuvant therapy. During the study, participants will be regularly monitored for progression-free survival and overall survival for up to about 73 months. Researchers will also assess tumor response, duration of response, adverse events, and quality of life using questionnaires over approximately 25 months. The study involves ongoing evaluations to understand how these treatments affect symptoms, functioning, and overall health during long-term follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating calderasib alone or combined with cetuximab to treat people with advanced solid tumors that have the KRAS G12C mutation, excluding colorectal cancer. This study aims to measure how many participants experience tumor shrinkage or disappearance and compare the responses between the two treatments. It is a phase 2, open-label trial focused on treatment safety and tolerability. Participants will receive calderasib orally with no set limit on treatment cycles. Some participants will also receive cetuximab via intravenous infusion every two weeks. Treatment continues until criteria for stopping the study intervention are met. The trial uses a randomized, parallel design to compare the two experimental arms. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for tumor response, adverse events, and treatment discontinuations related to side effects. Researchers will also assess progression-free survival, duration of response, and overall survival up to about 76 months. The trial lasts until April 2032, with ongoing safety and efficacy evaluations during this period.

Researchers are studying treatments for locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer mCRC that cannot be removed by surgery and has a specific KRAS G12C gene mutation. This trial aims to evaluate if adding the targeted therapies calderasib and cetuximab to the standard chemotherapy regimen mFOLFOX6 can provide better outcomes compared to mFOLFOX6 with or without bevacizumab. The study focuses on the safety and tolerability of these combinations and whether they can help people live longer without their cancer growing or spreading. Participants will be assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive calderasib orally, cetuximab every two weeks, and mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy including oxaliplatin, leucovorin or levofolinate calcium, and 5-fluorouracil every two weeks. The other group will receive mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab every two weeks, based on the investigators decision. Treatments will continue until certain stopping criteria are met. During the study, participants will be monitored for side effects and treatment tolerance, with regular assessments of cancer progression. Researchers will measure outcomes such as dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Quality of life will also be evaluated through questionnaires. The study may last up to several years, with monitoring continuing for safety and effectiveness throughout the treatment period and follow-up.