Castello De La Plana

This research aims to evaluate the effects of litifilimab (BIIB059), a monoclonal antibody, in adults with active subacute or chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Participants have active skin symptoms of CLE that have not improved with antimalarial therapy or had difficulties continuing that treatment. The study focuses on reducing skin disease activity using several scores including CLA-IGA-R and CLASI, while also assessing safety, immune response, and quality of life. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either litifilimab or a placebo injection under the skin every four weeks during a 24-week double-blind period where neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given. After this, all participants will receive litifilimab injections every four weeks for an additional 28 weeks. Those who complete the treatment may join a long-term extension study or enter a follow-up safety period lasting up to 24 weeks. Total participation may last up to 80 weeks. Throughout the study, researchers will monitor skin disease activity using the CLA-IGA-R erythema score and the CLASI-A activity score to see how many participants improve. They will also assess safety, tolerability, immune system effects, and participants' quality of life using questionnaires. These evaluations occur regularly during both treatment periods and follow-up to understand the impact of litifilimab on CLE symptoms and overall health.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab as first-line treatments for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, and global study focuses on participants with stage IV mNSCLC who do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements and are eligible for systemic therapy. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The study compares these two biological treatments given as monotherapy. Both groups will be monitored over time to assess treatment impact and safety. Throughout the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor measurements by CT or MRI, performance status assessments, and organ function tests. Researchers will measure overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Tumor samples are collected before treatment for central testing, and participants’ health and treatment responses are closely followed during the trial period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as initial treatments for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study focuses on patients whose tumors meet the PD-L1 expression threshold of 1% or higher and do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements that would require other targeted therapies. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle. Both groups also receive platinum-based chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin, administered intravenously up to four cycles, along with pemetrexed given intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle. The study monitors these treatments as first-line therapy for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size and response, as well as evaluations of organ and bone marrow function. Researchers track overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Safety is closely monitored throughout, and patients are followed long-term to assess outcomes related to treatment effectiveness and tolerability.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of combining durvalumab and domvanalimab compared to durvalumab plus placebo in adults with locally advanced (Stage III), unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease has not worsened after definitive platinum-based concurrent chemoradiation therapy. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international study involves multiple centers. Participants receive intravenous infusions of durvalumab and domvanalimab or durvalumab and placebo. The treatments are given after patients have completed concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy with a total radiation dose of approximately 60 Gy. The study monitors patients over time to assess treatment effects and safety. During the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor tissue analysis for PD-L1 status, performance status assessments, and monitoring of organ and marrow function. The main outcome measured is progression-free survival up to 8 years after randomization. Researchers also monitor for any adverse effects and disease progression throughout the study period.

Researchers are investigating treatments for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer who are at higher risk of relapse after surgery within the last five years. This phase II, open-label study uses a biomarker-driven approach to monitor minimal residual disease (MRD) by analyzing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in blood samples. The study includes a pre-screening phase, a molecular follow-up phase with ctDNA surveillance, and an interventional treatment phase, aiming to identify patients at molecular relapse and evaluate whether early treatment can improve outcomes. Participants first enter a ctDNA surveillance phase where tumor tissue and blood samples are collected to create individualized mutation panels. Blood is tested every three months during the first year and every six months thereafter. If ctDNA is detected, patients may enter one of four treatment arms: standard treatment followed by change, giredestrant alone, giredestrant combined with abemaciclib, or giredestrant combined with inavolisib. LHRH agonists are given as appropriate for men and premenopausal women. Treatment dosing and schedules are defined, including special dosing for certain kidney function levels. The study allows arm expansions based on ctDNA response criteria. Throughout the study, patients undergo regular ctDNA assessments to monitor treatment response. Safety and disease progression are tracked with scans and clinical evaluations. After treatment, a follow-up period collects survival and new therapy information every three months until study end. The primary outcome is measuring a decrease or clearance of baseline ctDNA three months after starting treatment. Total enrollment includes 976 patients for surveillance, with 40 allocated to treatment arms initially, and potential expansion based on results.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of a medicine called Mevrometostat for treating adults with Relapsed/Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC), Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC), and Follicular Lymphoma (FL). This Phase 1 study includes three parts; Parts 1 and 2 have finished enrolling, while Part 3 is currently open and focuses on men with CRPC who have progressed after prior treatment. The study aims to understand the safety profile, toxicities, and preliminary effectiveness of Mevrometostat alone or combined with other treatments. Participants in Part 3 receive oral Mevrometostat and/or enzalutamide. Part 3 has two substudies: a Bioequivalence (BE) substudy where participants take three single doses of Mevrometostat in separate periods, and a Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) substudy with two cohorts. Cohort 1 receives Mevrometostat twice daily and/or itraconazole once daily, while Cohort 2 receives Mevrometostat twice daily, enzalutamide once daily, and/or itraconazole once daily. After the assessment phase, all participants enter a maintenance phase taking Mevrometostat twice daily and enzalutamide once daily until their cancer no longer responds. Throughout the study, participants will have regular evaluations including monitoring for dose limiting toxicities, adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, vital signs, and disease response. The study will track radiographic progression-free survival until disease progression or death, up to approximately two years. This close monitoring aims to gather data on the safety, tolerability, and effects of the treatments over time.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and tolerability of TAK-861 in people with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) who have already been exposed to TAK-861 in earlier studies. The study also aims to observe improvements in symptoms such as excessive daytime sleepiness and the frequency of cataplexy episodes. This long-term extension trial continues from previous phase 2 and phase 3 trials and includes participants who completed those earlier studies. All participants in this trial will receive TAK-861 tablets. Those who were previously given a placebo in parent trials will be randomly assigned to a dose of TAK-861. The study plans to enroll up to 500 participants worldwide and will last approximately 5 years, or until the study is stopped or the drug is approved and launched. Participants will visit clinics multiple times, with some visits possibly done at home, and will have a follow-up check 4 weeks after their last dose. During the study, participants will be monitored for treatment-emergent adverse events from the time they consent until 4 weeks after their final dose, covering up to about 5 years. Researchers will assess safety and tolerability regularly through these visits and follow-ups. The focus is on identifying any side effects and understanding the long-term effects of TAK-861 in people with NT1.

Researchers are comparing the length of time participants survive without signs of cancer returning after treatment for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC). This Phase 3 study focuses on patients who have received Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treatment and have specific FGFR mutations or fusions. The study aims to evaluate and compare disease-free survival between those treated with TAR-210 and those receiving intravesical chemotherapy chosen by the investigator. Participants will receive either TAR-210, a drug administered directly into the bladder, or one of two chemotherapy drugs, Mitomycin C or Gemcitabine, also given intravesically. All visible tumors must be fully removed before randomization. The study includes patients who are either unresponsive to BCG, experienced with BCG, or intolerant to BCG treatment. Participants must not be eligible for or must refuse radical cystectomy surgery. During the study, participants will be monitored for disease-free survival for up to five years. Researchers will perform assessments including urine testing, tumor tissue analysis, and biopsies as needed to confirm eligibility and monitor disease status. Safety, treatment adherence, and patient health status will be regularly evaluated to ensure ongoing suitability for the study.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of TAR-210 compared to a single-agent intravesical chemotherapy in adults with intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who have specific fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) mutations or fusions. This phase 3 randomized study aims to compare disease-free survival between these treatments. Eligible participants must have a confirmed diagnosis of intermediate-risk NMIBC with certain risk factors and be willing to undergo multiple cystoscopies and assessments throughout the study. Participants will receive either TAR-210, which is delivered directly into the bladder, or one of the investigator-chosen intravesical chemotherapy drugs, including Gemcitabine or MMC, also administered into the bladder. Prior to randomization, visible tumors must be fully removed, and the absence of disease confirmed. The study includes a main study group and a substudy group with slightly different eligibility criteria based on tumor grade and risk factors. During the study, participants will be closely monitored through cystoscopies and surgical assessments (TURBT) to evaluate cancer recurrence or progression. The primary outcome measure is disease-free survival, tracked from randomization until the first documented cancer recurrence, progression, or death, over approximately four years and two months. Safety and treatment adherence will also be assessed throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the ability of dapirolizumab pegol (DZP) added to standard care medications to improve moderate to severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) symptoms over the long term. This Phase 3 trial focuses on participants aged 16 and older who have active SLE with specific disease activity and serological markers. The goal is to assess clinical improvement using the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Disease Activity Index 2004 (BILAG 2004)-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) at Week 48. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either dapirolizumab pegol (DZP) or placebo at scheduled times alongside their stable standard of care treatments. Standard medications include antimalarials combined with glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants or glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants alone if antimalarials are not suitable. The study is double-blind and placebo-controlled, ensuring unbiased comparison between the two groups. Throughout the study, participants will undergo regular assessments to monitor disease activity and treatment safety up to Week 48. Researchers will track responses based on disease activity indices and monitor for any adverse effects. The study includes careful screening and follow-up evaluations to understand the long-term effects of adding DZP to usual care in people with moderately to severely active SLE.