Modesto

Researchers are looking for new ways to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD). Available standard (usual) treatments for NVAMD, such as aflibercept, may not work for every person. Researchers want to learn if a trial medicine called tiespectus (also called MK-8748 or EYE201) can treat NVAMD. The goal of this trial is to learn if tiespectus works as well as aflibercept to treat NVAMD.

Researchers are evaluating intravitreal EYE103 in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD) or macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). This Phase 2, randomized, dose-masked study includes four patient cohorts: treatment-naive NVAMD participants, incomplete responder (IR) NVAMD participants as monotherapy, IR NVAMD participants receiving EYE103 combined with aflibercept 2.0 mg, and treatment-naive BRVO participants. The study aims to assess safety and efficacy of different doses of EYE103 in these conditions. Participants in each cohort will be randomly assigned to receive either a low or high dose of EYE103 via intravitreal injection. All participants will receive three injections spaced four weeks apart. IR NVAMD participants in the combination therapy cohort will also receive an injection of aflibercept 2.0 mg on Day 1. The timing of enrollment into each cohort is determined by the Sponsor. Participants will undergo safety and efficacy assessments at each injection visit, with some cohorts returning two weeks after injections for further evaluations. Assessments include measuring best-corrected visual acuity using the ETDRS chart, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundoscopy, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) to measure central subfield thickness. The study concludes at Week 12, which is the end-of-study visit for all participants.

Researchers are studying the effects of two experimental drugs, pozelimab and cemdisiran, in adults aged 50 to 85 who have Geographic Atrophy (GA) caused by Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD), a condition that affects central vision. The study aims to compare how quickly GA progresses in patients treated with cemdisiran alone, a combination of pozelimab and cemdisiran, or a placebo. Additional goals include monitoring possible side effects, measuring drug levels in the blood, and checking for antibodies that might reduce drug effectiveness or cause side effects. Participants receive subcutaneous injections of either pozelimab combined with cemdisiran, cemdisiran alone, or a placebo. The study is randomized, double-masked, and placebo-controlled, conducted at multiple centers. Treatment schedules and dosing are managed as described in the protocol, with vaccinations for meningococcal and pneumococcal infections required prior to participation. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular clinic visits where eye imaging using Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) tracks the progression of GA lesion area over 52 weeks. Researchers also monitor safety, side effects, and immune responses, ensuring adherence to study procedures. The main outcome measured is the growth rate of the GA lesion area over one year, helping to evaluate the potential benefits and risks of the study drugs.

Researchers are evaluating a vaccine called BLB-201 for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants and children aged 8 to 59 months. This Phase 1/2a randomized, placebo-controlled trial aims to study the safety, tolerability, and immune response after vaccination. Children included may have had prior RSV infection or not, allowing assessment in both seronegative and seropositive groups. The trial tests two doses of the BLB-201 vaccine: a low dose (10^6 PFU) and a high dose (10^7 PFU). Participants receive either one dose on Day 1 or two doses on Day 1 and Day 57. A placebo group receives a saline solution matching the low dose diluent. The study compares these groups to monitor how the vaccine is handled by the body and whether it produces an immune response. During the study, children are carefully monitored for side effects, including solicited adverse events from Day 1 to 15 and unsolicited events through Day 29. Their health is assessed through medical history, physical exams, and laboratory tests. Researchers track vaccine safety and immune response over the study period, with parents or guardians providing consent and helping with participation. The total study duration and follow-up ensure thorough evaluation of vaccine effects in young children.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab to standard chemotherapy, with or without radiation, can improve survival for patients aged 5 to 60 years with newly diagnosed stage I or II classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares outcomes in groups based on their early response to initial chemotherapy, aiming to understand if immunotherapy can lead to better progression-free survival and overall survival compared to standard treatment alone. The study also looks at side effects, quality of life, and long-term health impacts across different patient groups. Participants first receive two cycles of standard ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days, followed by imaging to classify their response as rapid or slow early responders and their risk status as favorable or unfavorable. Based on these factors, patients are assigned to one of eight treatment arms that include either continued standard chemotherapy regimens or immunotherapy with brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab, sometimes combined with involved-site radiation therapy. Treatments are given intravenously or orally depending on the drugs, and cycles typically last 28 days. Imaging and blood samples are collected regularly throughout the study. Throughout the trial, participants undergo frequent scans such as FDG-PET, CT, MRI, and PET-CT to monitor their disease status. Blood samples and questionnaires assess treatment effects and quality of life. After completing treatment, patients have scheduled follow-up visits every 3 months for the first year, then every 6 months for two years, and annually up to 12 years to track long-term outcomes, side effects, and survival. The main measurements focus on progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment-related adverse events, and patient-reported experiences.

Researchers are evaluating two surgical procedures, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, to see how well they reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women who have BRCA1 gene mutations. The study aims to determine if removing just the fallopian tubes (bilateral salpingectomy) is almost as effective as removing both the fallopian tubes and ovaries (bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) in lowering ovarian cancer risk. This trial also assesses symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, sexual function, cancer-related distress, decision-making about surgery, and treatment side effects in these patients. Participants choose between two groups: one group undergoes bilateral salpingectomy and may have their ovaries removed later, while the other group undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups receive pelvic or transvaginal ultrasounds or pelvic MRI scans during screening, and blood samples are collected throughout the trial. Ancillary studies include quality-of-life assessments and questionnaires. The study also collects tissue and blood samples for future research. After surgery, participants have follow-up visits at 10 to 60 days, then at 6, 12, and 24 months, and annually for up to 20 years. Researchers monitor the time until any high-grade serous carcinomas develop, specifically ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers. They also track menopausal symptoms, sexual function, quality of life, cancer distress, medical decisions about surgery, and any adverse events during this long-term follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating adults aged 18 and older who have a specific eye condition called centre-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME), a type of diabetic macular edema. The study aims to find out whether an oral medicine called BI 1815368 can improve vision in people with CI-DME and to determine the best dose. This is a Phase 2 study focused on assessing the medicine's safety, efficacy, and tolerability over 48 weeks of treatment. The study has two parts. In the first part, participants are randomly assigned to one of two equal groups: one group takes BI 1815368 tablets and the other takes placebo tablets, which look like the medicine but contain no active drug. In the second part, participants are randomized into four groups of equal size, three of which receive different daily doses of BI 1815368, while one group continues to take placebo. All participants take tablets twice daily for about 11 months. Participants stay in the study for about a year and visit the study site 16 times. During visits, doctors check vision and collect detailed eye pictures along with health information. Researchers compare changes in vision and eye condition over time between the groups. The main outcome measured is whether participants gain 10 or more Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters of visual acuity at week 48 compared to baseline, indicating improved sight.

Researchers are investigating the addition of an immunotherapy drug called durvalumab to standard chemotherapy treatment in patients with MammaPrint High 2 Risk (MP2) stage II-III hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer. This phase III trial aims to compare the effectiveness of usual chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy combined with durvalumab. Immunotherapy with durvalumab may help the immune system attack cancer cells and prevent tumor growth and spread, while chemotherapy drugs like paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide work to stop cancer cells from growing or dividing. Previous studies suggest patients with an MP2 result might respond better to this combined treatment approach. Participants first undergo MammaPrint testing to confirm MP2 status before randomization into two groups. One group receives paclitaxel intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 14 days for 6 cycles, followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide intravenously on day 1 every 14 days for 4 cycles. The other group receives the same chemotherapy schedule plus durvalumab intravenously over 60 minutes on specified cycles during both chemotherapy phases. Mammography is performed during screening, and optional tissue and blood samples are collected for future studies. Throughout the study, participants are monitored through various assessments including imaging, physical exams, laboratory tests, and quality of life questionnaires focusing on fatigue and physical and mental health. Researchers track breast cancer event-free survival and other outcomes such as treatment side effects and response rates. After completing treatment, patients are followed for up to 10 years or until death to evaluate long-term outcomes and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of nivolumab to the usual treatment of paclitaxel and ramucirumab in patients with advanced or locally unresectable stomach or esophageal adenocarcinoma. This phase II/III trial aims to determine if adding nivolumab improves progression-free survival and overall survival compared to paclitaxel and ramucirumab alone. The study also assesses response rates, disease control, safety, tolerability, and quality of life in participants with PD-L1 CPS 21 1 advanced gastric or esophageal cancer. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The first group receives nivolumab IV on day 1 of each 28-day cycle, ramucirumab IV on days 1 and 15, and paclitaxel IV on days 1, 8, and 15. The second group receives ramucirumab IV on days 1 and 15 and paclitaxel IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Treatment continues every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. Optional blood samples may be collected during the study. Imaging with CT and MRI is performed throughout. Participants undergo scans and assessments at baseline and during treatment to monitor cancer progression and treatment effects. They also complete questionnaires on quality of life and symptoms. After treatment ends, participants are followed up at 30, 60, and 90 days and then every 6 months for up to 3 years. Researchers measure progression-free survival and overall survival as primary outcomes, along with other safety and patient-reported measures.

Researchers are evaluating an Internet-based pain coping skills program combined with enhanced usual care to see if it improves pain severity and pain interference among adult cancer survivors experiencing persistent cancer-related pain. The study also investigates how this program affects opioid and other pain medication use, quality of life, self-confidence in managing pain, and other factors such as fatigue, sleep, emotional distress, and cognitive function. The study plans to enroll 250 participants who have had invasive cancer treated with surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, or other therapies. Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to either receive the 8-session Internet-based pain management program along with enhanced usual care or receive enhanced usual care alone. The program is designed to help participants better manage their cancer-related pain through online sessions. Each participant will be involved for about 9 months, from the initial randomization to the final follow-up assessment at week 34. During the study, participants will complete assessments evaluating pain severity and pain interference using the Brief Pain Inventory. Researchers will also measure medication use, quality of life, pain management confidence, and other health factors through questionnaires and interviews. Participants are expected to complete follow-up assessments at 22 and 34 weeks. The study includes monitoring for safety and adherence to the pain management program, and those without reliable internet access may receive tablets to participate.