Ellicott City

Researchers are evaluating molnupiravir, a study medicine designed to stop the COVID-19 virus from multiplying, to see if it can prevent severe illness from COVID-19 more effectively than a placebo. This Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study focuses on non-hospitalized adults at high risk of severe disease progression due to COVID-19. The study addresses the need for alternative treatments for people who cannot take certain COVID-19 medications due to availability or potential drug interactions. Participants will receive either molnupiravir or a placebo, both given orally as two 400 mg film-coated tablets every 12 hours for 5 days, totaling 10 doses. Some participants may also receive remdesivir as part of standard care if clinically appropriate and available. The study compares the effects of molnupiravir with placebo in preventing severe illness outcomes. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for outcomes such as hospitalization, death, or medically attended visits related to COVID-19 up to 29 days. Safety is assessed by tracking adverse events for up to about 5 months and discontinuation of study treatment due to adverse events for about 5 days. The study involves laboratory tests, symptom assessments, and safety evaluations to understand molnupiravir's impact on disease progression and participant health.

Researchers are evaluating a new vaccine called V118C designed to prevent pneumococcal disease, which includes infections caused by the Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria. This study focuses on toddlers and infants to understand the safety and tolerance of V118C. It is a Phase 1 trial that compares V118C to an existing pneumococcal vaccine called PCV20 in children. The study has two parts: Stage 1 involves toddlers aged 12 to 15 months who have already received three doses of PCV20 during infancy. Stage 2 involves infants around 2 months old who will receive four doses of V118C using a 3+1 schedule (three infant doses plus one toddler dose). Both vaccines are given by intramuscular injection. The study compares safety and immune response between V118C and PCV20. Participants will be monitored for immediate reactions within 30 minutes after vaccination and for local and systemic side effects up to 7 days post-vaccination. Unsolicited adverse events will be tracked up to 28 days, and serious or medically attended events will be assessed for up to 12 months after vaccination. The study aims to collect detailed safety and tolerability information over this period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of enicepatide, a dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist, for managing weight in adults with obesity or overweight who also have Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This Phase III study compares multiple doses of enicepatide to a placebo to understand its impact on weight loss in this population. Participants receive either enicepatide or a placebo once weekly through an integrated drug-device combination. The study uses a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design to assess the effects of the treatment. The placebo is volume-matched and administered using the same method as the active drug. During the study, participants will have their body weight changes measured up to week 72 to assess efficacy. Researchers will monitor weight changes as the primary outcome. Participants must be able to self-administer the injections or receive them from a trained individual, and their safety and adherence will be observed throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of two different methods of giving pegloticase, a drug for uncontrolled gout, combined with methotrexate (MTX). This Phase 3 trial compares pegloticase given as an 18 mg injection under the skin every two weeks with pegloticase given as an 8 mg intravenous (IV) infusion every two weeks, both alongside weekly oral MTX. The main goal is to see which method better maintains normalized serum uric acid levels below 6 mg/dL for at least 80% of the time during the sixth month of treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive pegloticase either by subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion every two weeks, along with weekly oral doses of methotrexate. Both groups will be treated over several months while closely monitored. The study is double-blind, meaning neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is being given to maintain unbiased results. During the trial, participants will undergo regular assessments to monitor their serum uric acid levels and overall response to treatment, especially focusing on weeks 20 through 24 (Month 6). Safety and efficacy will be tracked throughout the study, including how well participants tolerate the treatments and any side effects. The study's main measure is the proportion of participants who achieve a sustained uric acid response during Month 6.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of EIK1001 combined with standard treatments in adults with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not previously received vein-based treatment for their advanced disease. This phase 2, open-label, multicenter trial includes participants with confirmed stage 4 squamous or non-squamous NSCLC without mutations suitable for first-line targeted therapy. The study aims to find appropriate dosing and monitor adverse events alongside treatment response. Participants receive EIK1001, a Toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist, together with pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, and chemotherapy drugs such as paclitaxel, pemetrexed, or carboplatin. These treatments are combined as part of the standard care for stage 4 NSCLC. The trial assesses safety and efficacy over the treatment period, including a dose-finding phase to determine the best dose of EIK1001. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including tumor measurements based on RECIST 1.1 criteria, organ function tests, and monitoring of performance status. Researchers track the percentage of participants experiencing safety events throughout up to two years of treatment. Follow-up includes ongoing evaluation of side effects and effectiveness to understand the treatment impact and participant well-being over the course of the trial.

Researchers are conducting a phase 3 open-label, randomized, controlled, multicenter study to compare petosemtamab with investigator's choice monotherapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who have incurable metastatic or recurrent disease. This study focuses on patients with progressive disease after anti-PD-1 therapy and platinum-containing therapy and aims to evaluate the treatments as second- or third-line options. Participants will receive either petosemtamab or one of the investigator's choice monotherapies, including cetuximab, methotrexate, or docetaxel. The study involves treatment administration under controlled conditions with monitoring for efficacy and safety. The goal is to assess the treatments over time with a focus on response rates and overall survival. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including radiologic imaging to measure tumor response, and evaluations of overall survival up to approximately three years. The primary outcomes include objective response rate assessed by blinded independent central review and overall survival. Researchers will monitor patient health, side effects, and treatment effectiveness throughout the study duration.

Researchers are evaluating AZD0780, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, in a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study to see if it can reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-PLUS) in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or those at high risk for a first ASCVD event. The study compares AZD0780 to a placebo and monitors participants from randomization until the primary analysis censoring date, followed by a final study closure visit. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either oral AZD0780 or an oral placebo once daily. The treatment period lasts until the primary analysis censoring date, after which a study closure visit will occur. The study is event-driven and designed to assess the time to the first major cardiovascular event during treatment. During the study, participants will be closely monitored with various assessments to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes and safety over approximately 54 months. Researchers will track the time to first event of any component of MACE-PLUS and collect data to assess the effect of AZD0780 compared to placebo. The study includes regular visits and evaluations to ensure participant safety and adherence to treatment.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) with or without durvalumab compared to the investigator's choice chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab in patients who have PD-L1 positive locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This Phase III, randomized, open-label, international study aims to see if adding durvalumab to Dato-DXd can help patients live longer without their cancer worsening or simply live longer compared to standard chemotherapy with pembrolizumab. The study also examines how the treatments and cancer impact patients' quality of life. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: Dato-DXd plus durvalumab, Dato-DXd alone, or investigator's choice chemotherapy (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or gemcitabine plus carboplatin) combined with pembrolizumab. All treatments are given by intravenous infusion. The study design includes stratification based on geographic location, disease-free interval history, and prior PD-1/PD-L1 treatment for early-stage TNBC. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor their disease status using RECIST 1.1 criteria and undergo imaging reviewed by blinded independent central review. Researchers will track progression-free survival, quality of life, safety, and other health measures over an anticipated period of up to 33 months. Participants must provide tumor samples for PD-L1 testing, and safety monitoring will continue throughout the study.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of a commercially available natural oil rinse product called PerioPull12 on dental health markers in adults. The study focuses on individuals with dental health issues such as increased pocket depth around teeth, which can lead to infection and periodontal disease. This 12-week pilot study aims to assess whether PerioPull12 can improve common clinical measures of oral health without the side effects associated with standard chemical treatments. Participants will use PerioPull12, a natural oil rinse containing ingredients like medium chain triglycerides from coconut oil, annatto seed extract, natural mint flavor, bromelain, ubiquinone, and delta tocotrienols. The study involves three dental visits spaced six weeks apart, during which oral samples will be collected and dental health parameters measured. These visits will track changes in plaque index, gingival index, and pocket depth at the start, midpoint, and end of the 12-week period. During these visits, researchers will collect oral samples and perform routine dental assessments that are standard in clinical practice. The collected data at baseline, six weeks, and twelve weeks will help evaluate PerioPull12’s impact on markers of dental health. Participants are expected to maintain their usual dental hygiene routine throughout the study. The total time commitment for participants is 12 weeks with three clinical assessments.

Researchers are evaluating a new approach to prevent cardiovascular events in patients at increased risk due to age and conditions like type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, or metabolic syndrome but without known symptomatic cardiovascular disease. The study compares a Cleerly Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Staging System-based care strategy with standard risk factor-based care to see if the former can better reduce cardiovascular events. The Cleerly system uses imaging to visualize and quantify coronary artery disease and guides personalized treatment and education based on this assessment. The trial uses the Cleerly CAD Staging System device, which employs a proprietary algorithm to detect and stage coronary artery disease and generate a risk score to guide treatment decisions. Participants receive either this stage-based care or the usual care based on traditional risk factors. The study is prospective, randomized, and pragmatic, designed to follow patients over an average of 3.5 years to compare cardiovascular event outcomes between these two care approaches. Participants will be monitored through cardiovascular event tracking throughout the study period. Data collected includes imaging results, risk scores, and treatment adherence to evaluate the impact of the care strategies. The primary outcome is the comparison of cardiovascular event risk between the Cleerly stage-based care and risk factor-based care groups. The study also includes ongoing safety monitoring and personalized management by a cardiologist-led team via digital communication devices.