Troy

This research aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the FloStent, a medical device used for treating men experiencing symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia BPH. The study compares the FloStent implant procedure to a sham procedure without deploying the device. It involves men aged 45 and older with symptomatic BPH to better understand how this device may impact urinary symptoms. Participants will undergo a flexible cystoscopy procedure. Those randomized to the treatment group will receive the FloStent implant during this procedure, while those in the control group will have the cystoscopy without the implant deployment, serving as a sham treatment. The study is randomized, double-blind, and includes parallel groups to compare outcomes over time. Throughout the study, participants will be assessed on changes in their International Prostate Symptom Score IPSS over 12 months. Researchers will monitor symptom improvements at 3, 6, and 12 months to evaluate response rates. Participants will complete study visits and follow the protocol to help researchers gather data on the devices safety and impact on urinary symptoms.

Researchers are studying a trial medicine called MK-7262 to lower the level of Lipoproteina or Lpa in the blood. This trial also looks at another medicine named enlicitide, which lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol LDL-C. The study aims to find out if taking MK-7262 alone or together with enlicitide works better than a placebo in lowering Lpa and LDL-C levels. The safety and tolerability of these medicines are also being evaluated. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups. One group will take both MK-7262 and enlicitide placebos, the second will take enlicitide with an MK-7262 placebo, the third will take MK-7262 with an enlicitide placebo, and the fourth will take both MK-7262 and enlicitide. All treatments are oral tablets taken once daily for about 12 weeks. During the study, participants will have their Lpa and LDL-C levels measured at baseline and at weeks 8 and 12 to assess changes. Researchers will monitor any adverse events and whether participants stop treatment due to side effects, with safety observed for up to approximately 20 weeks. The study also tracks other related outcomes like percentages of participants reaching specific Lpa levels. Overall participation lasts up to about 12 weeks of treatment plus follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating the dose-response relationship of galvokimig compared with placebo in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis AtD. The study focuses on participants who have had chronic AtD for at least one year and aims to assess how different doses of galvokimig impact the condition. This phase 2 trial is designed to better understand the drugs effects on symptoms and safety in this population. Participants are randomly assigned to one of several groups receiving different predefined doses of galvokimig or a matching placebo during an initial 16-week intervention period. After week 16, participants continue treatment with the same or a modified dose of galvokimig. The study uses a double-blind design to compare the effects of these doses on atopic dermatitis. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including the Eczema Area and Severity Index EASI, Investigator Global Assessment vIGA, and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale PP-NRS. Safety is monitored through reported adverse events up to week 58. The primary outcome is the percentage of participants achieving a significant improvement in EASI score at week 16. The total study duration extends beyond 16 weeks to include ongoing safety and response evaluations.

Researchers are evaluating the long-term safety and effectiveness of Afimkibart also known as RO7790121 in adults with Atopic Dermatitis who participated in earlier Afimkibart clinical trials. This Phase 2 extension study focuses on participants who previously responded to Afimkibart treatment, aiming to gather extended data over several years. Participants will receive Afimkibart through subcutaneous injections according to a schedule outlined in the study protocol. The study is non-randomized and involves parallel groups, with all participants receiving the active drug. The treatment and follow-up periods can last up to six years to assess long-term outcomes. Throughout the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including the Eczema Area and Severity Index EASI, Investigator Global Assessment IGA, patient questionnaires on eczema symptoms and quality of life POEM and DLQI, and blood tests to measure drug levels and immune response. Researchers will monitor adverse events and antibody development against Afimkibart. Participation involves ongoing evaluations and monitoring over the extended study duration.

Researchers are evaluating the long-term safety and effectiveness of APG777 in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who have completed treatment in a previous APG777 study. This phase 2 extension study involves participants who, according to their doctors, would benefit from continued treatment with APG777. The study is designed as a multicenter, double-blind trial to assess ongoing treatment outcomes and safety over several years. Participants in this study will continue receiving APG777 through three main periods a screening visit coinciding with the last visit of the prior studys maintenance period, an extended treatment period, and a post-treatment follow-up period. Participants who met certain skin improvement criteria and did not use topical rescue medication during the prior study will maintain their previous dose and injection frequency. Those who did not meet these criteria or used rescue medication will receive APG777 according to a specific dosing plan in an open-label escape arm. During the study, participants will be closely monitored for treatment-emergent adverse events up to 3 years. The research team will also measure skin improvements using tools such as the Eczema Area and Severity Index EASI and the Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis vIGA-AD, as well as tracking itch severity, use of rescue therapy, and serum drug concentrations. The overall participation time includes up to 3 years of follow-up to evaluate long-term safety and efficacy outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating whether retatrutide and tirzepatide can prevent major adverse liver outcomes in adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease MASLD who are at high risk based on non-invasive tests. This Phase 3 randomized controlled trial aims to assess these treatments compared to placebo in about 4,500 adults over approximately 224 weeks. The study is sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company and focuses on liver disease progression and related health measures. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive retatrutide, tirzepatide, or placebo, all administered by subcutaneous injection. The trial includes two placebo groups corresponding to each experimental drug. After completing the main study, eligible participants may join a 2-year extension where all will receive either retatrutide or tirzepatide regardless of their initial assignment. During the study, participants may attend around 25 to 30 clinic visits for health monitoring, study procedures, and assessments of liver function and disease status. Researchers will measure the time to major adverse liver outcomes, changes in liver fibrosis scores, liver stiffness, liver fat content, liver enzyme levels, body weight, and cardiovascular events. Monitoring will continue from baseline through study completion, with detailed evaluations at multiple timepoints including week 104.

This research focuses on adults with obesity or overweight and aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of various investigational treatments for chronic weight management. It is a Phase 2 master protocol study that uses a framework to test multiple interventions, each detailed in separate appendices. The study establishes criteria for enrolling new participants and reports results when all intervention appendices have completed. Participants may receive different investigational drugs administered either by subcutaneous injection or orally, including LY3305677, LY3841136, tirzepatide, LY3549492, and others. Each intervention-specific appendix outlines the particular treatment details and analyses. Some participants receive placebos matching the administration method of the active treatments. Treatments and analyses are conducted in parallel groups, and interventions may start independently as they become available. Throughout the study, participants undergo screening to confirm eligibility and are randomly assigned to one of the intervention groups or placebo. Researchers monitor participant allocation up to week 6. The trial emphasizes double-blind procedures, and participant involvement includes receiving study treatments and attending scheduled visits. Safety and efficacy data are collected, and the study is planned to continue until early 2028, with primary outcome measures focusing on participant allocation to interventions.

Researchers are evaluating VENT-03 in adults with active cutaneous lupus erythematosus CLE, including those who may also have systemic lupus erythematosus SLE. This Phase 2a clinical trial aims to determine if VENT-03 affects the activity and severity of CLE and to assess its safety and how the body processes the drug. Participants will be compared to a placebo group to better understand VENT-03s effects. Participants will take either VENT-03 tablets or a placebo for the first 4 weeks. After this double-blind phase, all participants switch to taking VENT-03 for an additional 8 weeks in an open-label extension. The study uses a randomized, double-blind design with monthly clinic visits for checkups and tests throughout the treatment periods. During the study, participants will visit the clinic once a month for assessments including physical exams and tests to monitor the drugs effects and safety. Researchers will evaluate changes in interferon gene signature in the skin, CLE disease severity, skin biopsy markers, and record any treatment-emergent adverse events. Blood samples will be collected to study the drugs concentration over time. The total treatment duration is 12 weeks with ongoing safety and efficacy monitoring.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of KarXT combined with KarX-EC in adults aged 55 to 90 who have agitation related to Alzheimers Disease. This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to address agitation symptoms in this population by comparing the investigational drugs with a placebo. The study is sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb and uses established diagnostic criteria for Alzheimers Disease. Participants will receive either the combination of XanomelineTrospium Chloride capsules KarXT KarX-EC or a placebo with specified doses on designated days. The study includes a parallel group design and treatment lasts for 14 weeks. The main focus is to assess changes in agitation using the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory-International Psychogeriatric Association CMAI-IPA total score. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including cognitive and behavioral evaluations, safety monitoring through vital signs, laboratory tests, electrocardiograms, and rating scales for movement disorders and suicidal ideation. Caregivers will be involved to help monitor participant status and medication compliance. The primary outcome is measured at Week 14, with safety follow-up extending to Week 18. Participants are expected to be engaged throughout the treatment period and follow-up assessments.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of GIA632 in adults aged 18 to 99 years with non-segmental vitiligo NSV. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2b study aims to understand the dose-response relationship of GIA632 and determine the best dose to advance to a Phase 3 study. Participants have NSV affecting specific body surface areas confirmed by physical examination. Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of four different doses of GIA632 or a placebo. The assigned treatment is administered over a 48-week core period. After this period, an extension phase assesses longer-term safety and efficacy of the study drug. The study compares changes in facial and total body vitiligo scores at various time points up to 48 weeks. Throughout the study, participants undergo assessments including Vitiligo Area Scoring Index VASI measurements on the face and body, and the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale VNS. These assessments occur at baseline and multiple follow-up visits up to week 48. Researchers monitor participants for treatment effects and safety during the entire study duration, which runs until 2030, ensuring detailed evaluation of GIA632 over time.