Maple Grove

Researchers are evaluating petosemtamab compared with investigators choice monotherapy in patients with incurable metastatic or recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma HNSCC who have previously been treated. This phase 3 open-label, randomized controlled study focuses on patients whose disease has progressed after anti-PD-1 and platinum-containing therapies. It aims to assess effectiveness and safety for second- and third-line treatments in this population. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either petosemtamab or one of several investigators choice monotherapies, including cetuximab, methotrexate, or docetaxel. The treatments are given as part of a controlled multicenter trial. The study includes follow-up periods to evaluate responses and safety outcomes over time. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including radiologic evaluations to measure tumor response according to RECIST criteria, physical performance status checks, and laboratory tests to monitor organ function and adverse events. Researchers will track overall survival for up to approximately three years and evaluate other outcomes such as progression-free survival, response rates, quality of life measures, and treatment safety. The total duration of participation is aligned with treatment and outcome measurement timelines as specified.

Researchers are evaluating ART0380, a new oral drug that targets ATR kinase, in adults with advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including ovarian, peritoneal, fallopian tube, endometrial, colorectal, pancreatic, and acinar cell cancers. This open-label Phase IIIa study aims to find the recommended safe dose of ART0380 alone and combined with gemcitabine or irinotecan, understand side effects, and assess early signs of effectiveness. Participants will receive ART0380 either alone or in combination with gemcitabine or irinotecan in 21-day treatment cycles. ART0380 dosing schedules include intermittent or continuous oral administration. Gemcitabine is given on Days 1 and 8, and irinotecan is given as a 90-minute infusion on Days 1 and 8. The study has multiple parts evaluating different dosing regimens and patient groups, including dose escalation and dose expansion cohorts, with some participants randomized to receive combination therapy or gemcitabine alone. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor response, blood tests for safety and pharmacokinetics, and tumor marker evaluations over several months. Researchers will monitor side effects from the treatments and measure outcomes such as maximum tolerated dose, progression-free survival, response rates, and overall survival. The study includes follow-up for up to 24 months to observe long-term effects.

Researchers are evaluating the combination of fruquintinib and FOLFIRI as a second-line treatment for adults with metastatic colorectal cancer mCRC. This open-label Phase II trial focuses on assessing the effectiveness and safety of this combination in participants previously treated with first-line therapies including oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine, and bevacizumab. The study excludes those with certain genetic mutations and aims to enroll up to 60 participants. Participants will receive fruquintinib orally for 21 days followed by a 7-day break in each 28-day cycle. Concurrently, they will receive FOLFIRI intravenously every 2 weeks within each cycle. Treatment continues until disease progression or unacceptable side effects. The FOLFIRI regimen includes irinotecan, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil, with possible adjustment to the 5-fluorouracil bolus based on prior treatment tolerance. During the study, participants will be closely monitored with assessments every two cycles 56 days including progression-free survival evaluation, response rates, duration of response, disease control, and overall survival. Safety is tracked through adverse event monitoring from consent to 30 days after treatment ends, up to one year. The total study duration for each participant may last up to two years to fully capture treatment outcomes and safety data.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of iza-bren, a bi-specific antibody-drug conjugate targeting EGFR and HER3 with a chemotherapy payload, compared to treatment chosen by physicians including paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, carboplatin plus gemcitabine, and capecitabine for patients with first-line metastatic triple-negative breast cancer TNBC or low estrogen receptor ER-low, HER2-negative breast cancer who cannot receive anti-PDL1 or endocrine therapies. This study includes adults with locally advanced, recurrent inoperable, or metastatic disease who meet specific eligibility criteria. Participants are randomly assigned to receive iza-bren or one of the physicians choice chemotherapy regimens. The treatments are given at specified doses on scheduled days. The study includes two phases Phase 2 to determine the recommended dose of iza-bren and Phase 3 to compare progression-free survival and other outcomes. The study will last several years, with follow-up extending up to approximately 47 months after randomization. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor response, laboratory tests, and monitoring for adverse events. Quality of life questionnaires will also be completed. Researchers will track progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment-related side effects, tumor size changes, and patient-reported outcomes to evaluate the treatments. The total participation duration may extend up to several years depending on treatment response and follow-up requirements.

Researchers are evaluating whether combining tucatinib with trastuzumab and mFOLFOX6 works better than standard treatments for people with HER2 positive colorectal cancer that has spread or cannot be removed by surgery. This Phase 3 study also aims to learn about the side effects that may occur when taking this combination of drugs. Participants have metastatic or unresectable colorectal cancer and are randomly assigned to different treatment groups. Participants are randomly placed in one of two study groups. One group receives tucatinib taken orally twice daily along with trastuzumab given intravenously every 3 weeks and mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy every 2 weeks. The other group receives standard care, which may be mFOLFOX6 alone or combined with bevacizumab or cetuximab, both given intravenously on different schedules. Tissue samples and biopsies are collected before treatment to confirm HER2 positivity and other markers. During the study, participants will have regular evaluations including imaging scans to measure cancer progression, blood tests, and assessments of side effects and quality of life. Progression-free survival is the primary outcome measured for up to about 3 years, with other outcomes like overall survival and response rate also tracked. Safety monitoring continues for about one year after the last treatment. The study lasts several years, with ongoing follow-up to understand long-term effects and benefits.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with BRAF-V600 mutant melanoma that has spread to the brain. This phase II trial compares two combinations encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab versus ipilimumab and nivolumab. The study aims to determine which approach is more effective at shrinking and controlling brain metastases, and it also examines survival, response rates, and treatment safety. Patients are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group takes encorafenib daily by mouth, binimetinib twice daily by mouth, and receives nivolumab through an intravenous IV infusion every 28 days. The other group receives nivolumab IV every cycle and ipilimumab IV over 30 minutes during the first four cycles, with cycles repeating every 21 days initially, then every 28 days. Treatment continues unless disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. Participants undergo brain MRI scans before enrollment and throughout the study to assess tumor response using specific criteria. After completing treatment, patients are followed every six months for two years, then yearly up to three years. The study collects tissue, blood, spinal fluid, and stool samples for future research. Researchers monitor progression-free survival as the main outcome, along with overall survival, response rates, and treatment side effects.

Researchers are studying two surgical procedures to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA1 genetic mutations. This trial compares bilateral salpingectomy, which removes only the fallopian tubes, with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which removes both fallopian tubes and ovaries. The goal is to find out if removing just the fallopian tubes with delayed ovary removal is nearly as effective as removing both from the start. Participants choose between two groups one undergoes bilateral salpingectomy with the option of later ovary removal, and the other undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups have imaging tests like pelvic ultrasounds or pelvic MRIs during screening and provide blood samples throughout the study. Follow-up visits occur at multiple time points, including 10 to 60 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and then yearly for up to 20 years. During the study, researchers track if ovarian or related cancers develop and assess symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, cancer-related distress, sexual function, menopausal symptoms, medical decision making, and any adverse events. Various questionnaires and imaging tests support these evaluations. Long-term safety and cancer risk reduction are monitored for up to two decades after surgery.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of standard chemotherapy with or without the drug INCB161734 in participants who have metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma PDAC with a KRAS G12D mutation and have not received prior treatment for metastatic disease. This phase 3 study compares two groups to understand whether adding INCB161734 to chemotherapy improves outcomes in this condition. Participants will receive either oral INCB161734 tablets combined with chemotherapy chosen by their doctor either mFOLFIRINOX or GemNabP or a placebo tablet combined with the same chemotherapy options. The treatments are given according to the study protocol, and the study is conducted in a randomized, double-blind design to fairly compare the effects of INCB161734 plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy. During the study, participants will be monitored for overall survival, progression-free survival, and tumor response up to about two to three years. Researchers will also assess treatment side effects, quality of life using questionnaires, and other health outcomes. Participants will have regular visits for assessments, and safety will be closely tracked throughout the study period, which lasts until the study completion date in 2029.

Researchers are evaluating Pumitamig compared to Durvalumab in adults with unresectable stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer NSCLC who have completed concurrent chemoradiation therapy. This phase 3 study aims to assess which treatment better controls cancer progression and improves survival outcomes in this patient population. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either Pumitamig or Durvalumab at specified doses on designated days. Both treatments are administered following at least two cycles of platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy with a radiation dose of at least 54 Gy. The study focuses on patients who have no progressive disease after this initial treatment and have good performance status. Throughout the trial, participants will be monitored for progression-free survival and other outcomes such as overall survival, objective response, disease control rate, and duration of response over several years. Assessments include imaging reviewed by independent central reviewers and investigators according to standardized criteria. The study involves regular evaluations to track cancer status and safety, with follow-up extending up to approximately nine years to understand long-term effects.

This trial studies participants with previously untreated, unresectable, or metastatic colorectal cancer. It evaluates the safety and effectiveness of pumitamig combined with chemotherapy compared to bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy. The study includes participants who do not have specific genetic markers like dMMR, MSI-H, or BRAF V600E mutations, which may affect treatment response. Participants receive treatment with study drugs such as pumitamig, bevacizumab, and chemotherapy regimens including FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and CAPOX. The treatments are given at specified doses on specific days. The study uses a randomized, double-blind design with multiple experimental and comparator arms to assess these combinations. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular assessments to measure tumor response and survival outcomes. Key evaluations include imaging tests using RECIST v1.1 criteria, monitored by both investigators and independent reviewers, over a period of up to 5 years. Researchers track objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival to determine treatment outcomes and safety.