La Crosse

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Xeomin injections in preventing chronic migraine. This Phase 3 clinical trial compares Xeomin to placebo injections given into muscles of the head and neck. Participants have chronic migraine diagnosed for at least 12 months and meet specific headache and migraine day criteria. The study aims to measure changes in monthly migraine days over time with Xeomin treatment. Participants will receive four treatments spaced about 12 weeks apart over a total study duration of 52 to 55 weeks. The treatments involve injections of either Xeomin or placebo solution prepared with sodium chloride. Visits occur approximately every 4 weeks, totaling 14 visits: the first, last, and four treatment visits are on-site, while the other eight visits are remote via phone or video call. During the study, participants will keep headache diaries to track migraine and headache days. Researchers will focus on the change in monthly migraine days from baseline to six months after the first injection. Safety and effectiveness are monitored throughout, with frequent assessments during both on-site and remote visits to ensure accurate tracking of migraine symptoms and any side effects.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of Xeomin injections compared to placebo injections for preventing episodic migraine. This phase 3 clinical trial focuses on adults who experience episodic migraine, aiming to measure changes in the number of migraine days per month. Participants must have a diagnosis of episodic migraine for at least 12 months and meet specific headache frequency criteria. Participants will receive four treatments of either Xeomin or placebo injections into muscles of the head and neck, with treatments spaced about 12 weeks apart. The entire trial lasts approximately 52 to 55 weeks, beginning with a screening period of 4 to 5 weeks. There are about 14 visits in total, with the first, last, and four treatment visits conducted on-site, while the other visits are held remotely via phone or video. Throughout the study, participants will track their migraine days using a headache diary, and researchers will assess changes in monthly migraine frequency from baseline to six months after the first injection. Regular monitoring includes both in-person and remote assessments. The primary outcome focuses on the change in monthly migraine days between baseline and month six after treatment initiation.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as initial treatments for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study focuses on patients whose tumors meet the PD-L1 expression threshold of 1% or higher and do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements that would require other targeted therapies. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle. Both groups also receive platinum-based chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin, administered intravenously up to four cycles, along with pemetrexed given intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle. The study monitors these treatments as first-line therapy for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size and response, as well as evaluations of organ and bone marrow function. Researchers track overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Safety is closely monitored throughout, and patients are followed long-term to assess outcomes related to treatment effectiveness and tolerability.

Researchers are observing the short-term progression of geographic atrophy (GA) caused by age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in people aged 55 years and older. This multi-center, non-interventional study aims to identify participants with progressive GA to better understand the structural and functional changes of GA and explore connections with genetic or lifestyle factors. The study does not involve any treatment but focuses on monitoring disease progression over time. Participants with bilateral GA secondary to AMD will be observed without intervention. GA lesion size must be between 1.25 mm2 and 17.5 mm2 in at least one eye, confirmed by specialized imaging. Visual acuity and retinal sensitivity will be measured to ensure adequate vision for navigation. No treatments are administered, and the study collects data through imaging and vision tests at baseline and follow-up visits. During the study, participants will undergo assessments including visual acuity testing, microperimetry for retinal sensitivity, and imaging scans such as fundus autofluorescence and optical coherence tomography. Researchers will track the progression of GA at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months to evaluate changes. Participants must provide informed consent and be able to complete all assessments. Safety and eligibility will be monitored throughout the study duration.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have previously received an anti-CD38 antibody and lenalidomide. The study compares the effectiveness of talquetamab combined with pomalidomide (Tal-P), talquetamab combined with teclistamab (Tal-Tec), and investigator's choice between two standard regimens: elotuzumab with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (EPd), or pomalidomide with bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd). This Phase 3 trial aims to understand which combination best controls the disease progression. Participants will receive talquetamab as a subcutaneous injection, pomalidomide orally, teclistamab as a subcutaneous injection, elotuzumab intravenously, dexamethasone either orally or intravenously, and bortezomib as a subcutaneous injection. The study involves comparing these combinations with varying administration routes. The trial includes multiple treatment arms to assess different drug combinations in patients who have undergone 1 to 4 prior therapies. During the study, participants will be monitored for progression-free survival up to 3 years and 5 months. Researchers will regularly assess disease status, treatment response, and safety. Participants' performance status will be evaluated, and adherence to treatment and potential side effects will be carefully tracked. This long-term observation will help determine how well each treatment combination controls the disease over time.

Researchers are evaluating how well elacestrant works compared to standard endocrine therapy in adults with node-positive, Estrogen Receptor-positive (ER+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor-2 negative (HER2-) early breast cancer who are at high risk of the cancer returning. This is a Phase 3 global, multicenter, randomized, open-label study focusing on participants who have had early invasive breast cancer removed and meet specific receptor and risk criteria. The study aims to understand which treatment better prevents invasive breast cancer over up to five years. Participants will receive either elacestrant or one of several standard endocrine therapies, including anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, or tamoxifen, all given as oral tablets. Treatments will be administered according to the study plan, with careful monitoring throughout the trial. The study includes adults who have already received between 24 and 60 months of prior endocrine therapy, with or without certain inhibitors, and who have completed or stopped these treatments as required. During the study, participants will be monitored for invasive breast cancer-free survival for up to five years. Researchers will perform regular assessments to track treatment effects, side effects, and cancer recurrence. The study also includes safety monitoring and may involve additional tests or evaluations as needed to ensure participant well-being throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating whether giving a single dose of methylprednisolone before major liver surgery, called hepatectomy, can reduce surgery side effects like infections and longer hospital stays. This randomized controlled trial compares methylprednisolone to the standard care in adults undergoing elective major hepatectomy, including trisegmentectomy or total left or right hepatectomy. The study focuses on differences in 30-day all-cause morbidity between those who receive methylprednisolone and those who do not. Participants receive a single preoperative dose of methylprednisolone before their scheduled major liver surgery. Some patients may also undergo additional partial hepatectomy or operative ablation alongside the major hepatectomy. The trial does not include any other interventions, and the comparison is between methylprednisolone administration and standard care without this drug. During the study, participants will be monitored closely for complications and side effects related to surgery and treatment. Researchers will assess outcomes like infections and hospital stay length within 30 days after surgery. The study includes adult patients aged 18 years and older who are scheduled for this type of liver surgery, with ongoing observation to track safety and overall morbidity following the procedure.

This research aims to evaluate the immediate and long-term effects of a structured breathing practice on mental health symptoms including anxiety, depression, perceived stress, and sleep quality among healthcare professionals experiencing burnout. The study focuses on enhancing resilience and mental well-being in clinical care professionals who meet specific burnout criteria. Participants will engage in structured breathing sessions lasting 15, 30, or 36 minutes, tailored to their personal skill levels. The intervention is behavioral and delivered through mobile devices such as smartphones or tablets. The study monitors feasibility, acceptability, and participant satisfaction with the breathing practice over a 4-month period. During the study, healthcare professionals will be assessed for recruitment and retention rates, engagement with the mobile app, and the perceived feasibility and appropriateness of the intervention. Outcomes include participant satisfaction and measures related to mental health symptoms. The total participation duration spans enrollment through 4 months of follow-up, with continuous monitoring of intervention impact and app usage.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab to standard chemotherapy, with or without radiation, can improve survival for patients aged 5 to 60 years with newly diagnosed stage I or II classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares outcomes in groups based on their early response to initial chemotherapy, aiming to understand if immunotherapy can lead to better progression-free survival and overall survival compared to standard treatment alone. The study also looks at side effects, quality of life, and long-term health impacts across different patient groups. Participants first receive two cycles of standard ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days, followed by imaging to classify their response as rapid or slow early responders and their risk status as favorable or unfavorable. Based on these factors, patients are assigned to one of eight treatment arms that include either continued standard chemotherapy regimens or immunotherapy with brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab, sometimes combined with involved-site radiation therapy. Treatments are given intravenously or orally depending on the drugs, and cycles typically last 28 days. Imaging and blood samples are collected regularly throughout the study. Throughout the trial, participants undergo frequent scans such as FDG-PET, CT, MRI, and PET-CT to monitor their disease status. Blood samples and questionnaires assess treatment effects and quality of life. After completing treatment, patients have scheduled follow-up visits every 3 months for the first year, then every 6 months for two years, and annually up to 12 years to track long-term outcomes, side effects, and survival. The main measurements focus on progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment-related adverse events, and patient-reported experiences.

Researchers are evaluating two treatment combinations for patients with melanoma that has spread to the brain and has a specific BRAF-V600 mutation. This phase II trial compares encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab against ipilimumab and nivolumab to determine which approach better controls and shrinks brain metastases from melanoma. The study also aims to assess overall survival, response rates, treatment duration, and side effects of each regimen. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives encorafenib orally once daily, binimetinib orally twice daily, and nivolumab intravenously every 28 days. The other group receives nivolumab intravenously and ipilimumab intravenously during the first four cycles, with cycles every 21 days initially, then every 28 days thereafter. Treatment continues unless the disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. After treatment ends, participants have follow-up visits every six months for two years, then yearly until three years after starting the study. During the trial, participants undergo brain MRIs to monitor tumor response using standardized criteria. Imaging, tumor tissue, spinal fluid, stool, and blood samples are collected for research. Safety and effectiveness are carefully assessed through scans, physical exams, lab tests, and side effect monitoring. Progression-free survival up to three years after randomization is the main outcome. Participants remain in the study for about three years with periodic evaluations to track their health and disease status.