Digitally Disconnected: Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives on the Digital Divide and Potential Solutions.
Maria Alcocer Alkureishi, Zi-Yi Choo, Ali Rahman...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34705664/Actively Recruiting
Led by University of California, San Francisco · Updated on 2026-01-06
600
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
N/A
Total Duration
This research aims to improve telehealth access for low-income adults with chronic health conditions such as diabetes and hypertension by addressing both patient and clinic barriers. It evaluates a multi-level approach that includes digital health coaching for patients and practice facilitation at clinics to promote equitable telehealth use, especially among Black and Latinx populations. The study focuses on improving control of chronic conditions and increasing digital literacy and engagement with health technology. The interventions being studied include patient-level digital health coaching, which offers support in accessing devices, broadband, and telehealth skills, combined with chronic disease coaching. Clinic-level practice facilitation helps primary care teams address disparities in telehealth use by reviewing equity data and involving patient advisory councils. Participants are randomly assigned to one of four groups combining these interventions or usual care, with follow-up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months to assess effects. Participants will complete clinical assessments such as hemoglobin A1C and blood pressure measurements, and digital engagement will be monitored through patient portal use and telehealth visit rates. Additional measures include medication adherence, digital literacy, and patient activation. The study evaluates both patient and clinic outcomes over two years, with ongoing data collection, observations, and interviews to understand implementation and integration into practice.
CONDITIONS
Achieving Chronic Care equiTy by leVeraging the Telehealth Ecosystem
A
Andy Ramirez, BS
A
Alexandra Velasquez, MS
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
University of California, San Francisco
Lead Sponsor
San Francisco Tech Council
Collaborating Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Digital Health Coaching plus Practice Facilitation | Usual Care (Patient and Clinic) | Digital Health Coaching Only | Practice Facilitation Only | Current Digital Health Coaching Programs (External) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Digital health coaching for patients plus practice facilitation for clinics; aims to improve device access, digital skills, and chronic disease coaching while supporting clinic staff to address telehealth equity. | Standard practice for both patient and clinic; participants receive usual diabetes care without additional digital coaching or clinic facilitation. | Digital health coaching for patients only, providing assistance with diabetes management, device access, and digital literacy. Clinic receives usual care. | Practice facilitation for clinics only, addressing telehealth equity and disparities. Patients receive usual care. | Digital health coaching programs typically provide one-on-one support, digital skills training, and diabetes self-management education in underserved adult populations. Usually offered outside formal randomized trials. |
| Primary use | Improve diabetes outcomes and digital engagement through both patient-facing coaching and clinic staff support for telehealth equity. | Maintain standard diabetes management without targeted digital health coaching. | Enhance patient diabetes self-management with digital health coaching. | Support clinic teams in reviewing telehealth equity data and improving digital access. | Promote diabetes self-management and digital engagement through skills training and remote education for underserved adults. |
| How it is given or performed | Participants receive digital health coaching, device access support, and digital skills training. Clinic staff implement practice facilitation with regular review of telehealth equity data and patient advisory council input. | Patient and clinic teams continue routine diabetes care without additional digital support or targeted facilitation. | Patient receives digital coaching for diabetes, including device and internet access support and personalized skills teaching. Clinic follows standard practice. | Clinic staff conduct regular telehealth equity reviews and improvements. Patient receives usual diabetes care without digital coaching. | Programs typically use digital platforms, remote health coaches or educators, and skills-based training. Engagement may include calls, video sessions, and self-management tools. |
| Evidence status | Currently being evaluated in a randomized trial; results for diabetes outcomes and digital engagement are not yet established. | Established as the underlying standard care; not directly tested for impact on digital engagement in this trial. | Patient-level digital health coaching protocols have been tested in prior studies, showing mixed improvements in portal engagement and diabetes self-management; trial results pending for this arm. | Practice facilitation protocols have supported telehealth equity and staff engagement in prior studies; trial results for diabetes outcomes pending for this specific approach. | Systematic reviews show digital health coaching can improve diabetes self-management and engagement, but outcomes sometimes vary based on population and access barriers. |
| Important limitations | Trial protocol eligibility excludes patients with high digital literacy, limiting generalizability. Current trial results not yet available to confirm impact. | Routine care may not address digital skills gaps or telehealth disparities among underserved populations. No digital health coaching or targeted facilitation. | May improve patient engagement, but does not change clinic-wide telehealth equity processes. Some patients may still face barriers related to clinic or care team. | Improves clinic-level digital equity, but leaves individual patient-level gaps. Without patient coaching, digital barriers may persist. | Digital health coaching programs can be limited by patient access to technology and staff support. Engagement and outcome improvements are not guaranteed in all settings. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person or virtual) for eligibility assessment
Duration - Up to 24 months
Participants receive digital health coaching focused on telehealth use and chronic disease management, and/or their clinics receive practice facilitation to support equitable telehealth use.
Assessments at baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, and month 24
Duration - Up to 24 months
Participants are monitored for changes in clinical outcomes, digital literacy, and engagement with telehealth tools through scheduled assessments.
Assessments at month 3, month 6, month 12, and month 24
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
SINGLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
FACTORIAL
Primary Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Number of Arms
4
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Maria Alcocer Alkureishi, Zi-Yi Choo, Ali Rahman...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34705664/Margaret Samuels-Kalow, Todd Jaffe, Kori Zachrison
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33674277/Lorraine S Wallace, Heather Angier, Nathalie Huguet...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27613792/Kevin Patrick, Gregory J Norman, Evelyn P Davila...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23759410/Urmimala Sarkar, Andrew J Karter, Jennifer Y Liu...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20845203/Courtney R Lyles, Lina Tieu, Urmimala Sarkar...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30850461/Adenike Omomukuyo, Andy Ramirez, Aliyah Davis...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39679006/Veronica Ramirez, Emily Johnson, Cesar Gonzalez...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27095507/Lisa V Grossman, Ruth M Masterson Creber, Natalie C Benda...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30958532/Adam Schickedanz, David Huang, Andrea Lopez...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23423453/University of California, San Francisco
Lead Sponsor
San Francisco Tech Council
Collaborating Sponsor