Comparing Maitlands Rotation and Mulligans Spinal Mobilization Techniques for Treating Lumbar Radiculopathy in Adults

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are evaluating and comparing two mobilization techniques, Maitlands rotation mobilization and Mulligans spinal mobilization with leg movement SMWLM, in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. This study aims to discover which technique provides longer-lasting effects on pain, range of motion, and functional mobility for those suffering from this condition. The study is designed as a randomized controlled trial to assess these outcomes in a structured way. Participants will be divided into two groups receiving different treatment protocols. Group A will undergo Mulligans Spinal Mobilization at the lumbar spine L4-L5 with lower limb movement, performing 3 repetitions and 3 sets, followed by neurodynamic mobilization using the slump technique for 3 repetitions and 1 set. Group B will receive Maitlands Lumbar Rotation Mobilization with the same repetition and set scheme and neurodynamic mobilization as in Group A. Each participant will attend a total of 6 treatment sessions, one session per day. During the study, researchers will measure lumbar radiculopathy pain using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale NPRS, range of motion via the Straight Leg Raise SLR test, and functional status by the Oswestry Disability Index ODI at the 1st, 3rd, and 6th sessions of the treatment. The trial includes regular assessments to monitor progress and evaluate the effects of each mobilization technique. Participants will be involved for a short treatment period with repeated measurements to track changes over time.

Comparative Effects of Maitland's Rotation Mobilization and Mulligan's Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement on Lumbar Radiculopathy