Moers

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as initial treatments for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study focuses on patients whose tumors meet the PD-L1 expression threshold of 1% or higher and do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements that would require other targeted therapies. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle. Both groups also receive platinum-based chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin, administered intravenously up to four cycles, along with pemetrexed given intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle. The study monitors these treatments as first-line therapy for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size and response, as well as evaluations of organ and bone marrow function. Researchers track overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Safety is closely monitored throughout, and patients are followed long-term to assess outcomes related to treatment effectiveness and tolerability.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of combining durvalumab and domvanalimab compared to durvalumab plus placebo in adults with locally advanced (Stage III), unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease has not worsened after definitive platinum-based concurrent chemoradiation therapy. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international study involves multiple centers. Participants receive intravenous infusions of durvalumab and domvanalimab or durvalumab and placebo. The treatments are given after patients have completed concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy with a total radiation dose of approximately 60 Gy. The study monitors patients over time to assess treatment effects and safety. During the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor tissue analysis for PD-L1 status, performance status assessments, and monitoring of organ and marrow function. The main outcome measured is progression-free survival up to 8 years after randomization. Researchers also monitor for any adverse effects and disease progression throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) therapy, for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. The study also compares data from patients treated with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, and those receiving endocrine monotherapy with or without LHRH. This observational study aims to understand treatment decisions and clinical use of ribociclib after its approval, collecting socio-economic data, quality of life, and patient compliance information. Participants receive treatment based on their physician's clinical judgment without study-assigned interventions. The treatments observed include ribociclib with an aromatase inhibitor LHRH, abemaciclib with endocrine therapy LHRH, or endocrine monotherapy LHRH. The study is conducted in various breast cancer centers and gynecological practices in Germany and Austria to represent local healthcare settings. Participants undergo assessments to monitor treatment effectiveness, safety, quality of life, and adherence to therapy over time. Data collected include clinical outcomes, adverse events, socio-economic status, and patient-reported compliance. The primary outcome measured is invasive disease-free survival over 36 months. This information will help inform clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for patients with early breast cancer in routine practice.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of a triple therapy inhaler called BGF MDI containing budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol fumarate compared with a dual therapy inhaler called GFF MDI containing glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who have a higher risk of heart and lung problems. This Phase III randomized, double-blind, parallel group study takes place at multiple centers and focuses on cardiopulmonary outcomes in these patients. Participants receive either the BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily or the GFF MDI 14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily. The treatments are inhaled using metered dose inhalers. The study compares these two therapies over time to see how they affect the time until the first severe heart or lung event occurs. The study design ensures that neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given to reduce bias. During the study, participants will have regular visits to the study site or virtual visits to complete assessments. Researchers will monitor lung function, symptoms, and blood tests, including blood eosinophil counts and COPD assessment test scores. The main outcome measured is the time to the first severe cardiac or COPD event, with follow-up lasting up to three years. Safety and adherence to treatment will also be closely observed throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of a combination treatment called triple therapy, which includes bempedoic acid, ezetimibe, and either atorvastatin or rosuvastatin. This study focuses on patients with primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia who are at high or very high cardiovascular risk. The goal is to understand how well this combination lowers LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) in a real-world clinical setting. The study observes patients who have already started triple therapy within the last four weeks. No drugs are administered as part of this study; instead, it monitors the ongoing treatment with bempedoic acid combined with ezetimibe and either rosuvastatin or atorvastatin. The study measures LDL-C changes from baseline to eight weeks after starting triple therapy and continues follow-up for one year to assess lipid goal achievement, adherence to therapy, treatment changes, laboratory value shifts, and occurrence of cardiovascular events. Participants will have their LDL-C levels and other lab values assessed at baseline, eight weeks, and one year after starting triple therapy. Researchers will collect data on adverse events, adherence to treatment, and cardiovascular outcomes such as heart attack, stroke, death from cardiovascular causes, and coronary procedures during the follow-up year. The study also tracks treatment pathways and changes over this period to better understand real-world use and effectiveness of this triple therapy approach.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of AZD0901 compared to Investigator's choice of therapy for adults with advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma expressing Claudin18.2. This Phase III, global, multi-center, open-label, randomized study also includes an assessment of the Ventana CLDN18.2 assay as a diagnostic tool to identify patients who might benefit from AZD0901 treatment. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either AZD0901 at two different dose levels (with enrollment for the second dose level closed) or Investigator's choice of therapy. The comparator therapies include ramucirumab plus paclitaxel, paclitaxel alone, docetaxel, irinotecan, TAS-102 (oral), or apatinib (oral, China only), with dosing schedules varying by drug. Treatments are given intravenously or orally according to specific regimens and cycles. Participants will be involved in assessments measuring progression-free survival and overall survival for up to about three years from their first dose or randomization. Researchers will monitor disease progression, survival, safety, and the clinical performance of the diagnostic test. The study includes regular evaluations, imaging, and laboratory tests to track treatment effects and participant health throughout the study period.

Researchers are studying metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) patients whose tumors have a BRAFV600E mutation, which is known to have a poorer outlook compared to non-mutated cases. Standard treatments after the first therapy have shown limited success, with low response rates and short survival times. This study aims to understand how the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab works in real-world settings, focusing on effectiveness, quality of life, safety, and tolerability in German, Austrian, and Swiss patients who have already received prior therapies. Participants will receive encorafenib combined with cetuximab, treatments that target specific cancer mutations. This study is observational and non-interventional, meaning it records how patients respond to these drugs in routine care without altering their treatment. The study allows initial retrospective data collection and will follow patients longitudinally to gather comprehensive information about their experiences with the therapy. During the study, patients will be monitored for overall survival twelve months after starting treatment. Researchers will assess how well the treatment controls the cancer, side effects experienced, and patients' quality of life. Data will be collected from medical records and patient reports in regular clinical care, providing insights into the real-life use and impact of encorafenib and cetuximab for this patient group.

Researchers are evaluating ivonescimab as a first-line treatment option for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors show high PD-L1 expression. This phase 3 randomized, double-blinded study compares ivonescimab with pembrolizumab to assess overall survival and progression-free survival in this patient group. Participants will receive either ivonescimab or pembrolizumab as intravenous injections. The study is designed to monitor these treatments over time to determine which may provide better outcomes in controlling metastatic NSCLC in patients with high PD-L1 levels. The study includes patients with measurable non-brain lesions and no prior systemic treatment for metastatic NSCLC. During the trial, patients will be closely followed for up to approximately 36 months to measure overall survival and progression-free survival. Researchers will assess the safety and effectiveness of the treatments through regular evaluations, including monitoring for disease progression and survival status. This long-term follow-up ensures comprehensive understanding of treatment impact over time.

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness of durvalumab-based treatments in patients with hepatobiliary cancers, including unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) and advanced biliary tract cancers (aBTC). This multicountry, multicenter observational study aims to collect contemporary data on these treatments across 22 countries, involving approximately 2500 adult patients. The study focuses on measuring overall survival and other clinical outcomes in routine clinical practice or through early access programs. The study collects data on patients treated with durvalumab-based regimens, including combinations such as STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) and durvalumab with chemotherapy (e.g., Durvalumab plus GemCis). Data collection includes primary data gathered during routine visits and secondary data from medical records at enrollment and every 6 months. The study includes a baseline period of up to 5 years before starting durvalumab treatment and follows patients for up to 2 years for aBTC and 3 years for uHCC. Participants will have their demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, concomitant medications, and key outcomes such as real-world overall survival assessed at multiple time points (6, 12, 24 months for both aBTC and uHCC, and 36 months for uHCC). Researchers will also monitor progression-free survival, time to treatment progression, recurrence-free survival, and other clinical endpoints. Safety and follow-up continue until death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal, or study end.