Uebigau Wahrenbruck

This research aims to evaluate whether creating dedicated HIV teams in hospitals across ten European countries can increase HIV testing rates among patients showing signs of HIV-related conditions. The study uses a stepped-wedge design, where hospitals switch from routine care to the new intervention in sequence. This approach compares outcomes before and after the teams are in place, helping to understand the impact of the intervention across various locations and medical specialties. The intervention involves establishing local HIV teams led by specialists and supported by nurses and data experts. These teams identify patients needing HIV tests through electronic health records, provide feedback to doctors to encourage testing, offer education to healthcare staff about HIV, reduce stigma, and improve connections to prevention and care services. This program integrates smoothly into regular hospital routines and aims to close gaps in HIV diagnosis. Participants HIV testing rates will be monitored by reviewing records before and after the intervention. Researchers will also assess new HIV diagnoses, changes in testing patterns by country and specialty, and healthcare professionals knowledge and attitudes toward HIV. The study includes ongoing evaluation of how well the teams operate, resource use, and cost-effectiveness. Data collection extends up to several years to observe long-term effects, with continuous monitoring of care access and prevention services.

This trial investigates treatment options for patients with microsatellite stable MSS or proficient mismatch repair pMMR metastatic colorectal cancer who do not have active liver metastases. It is a phase II, prospective, randomized, open-label study conducted across multiple centers. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Fruquintinib combined with Tislelizumab compared to a control treatment in this specific patient group. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive Fruquintinib orally once daily for 21 days in a 28-day cycle along with Tislelizumab given intravenously every 42 days. The other group will receive Trifluridinetipiracil orally twice daily on specific days of a 28-day cycle plus Bevacizumab intravenously every 14 days. Treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, patient choice, or a maximum of 15 months. During the study, patients will undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to monitor disease status, evaluations of side effects, and quality of life measures. Follow-up will continue for up to 18 months after the last patient begins treatment or until death, withdrawal, or loss to follow-up. Researchers will primarily measure the efficacy of the Fruquintinib and Tislelizumab combination, along with overall survival, response rates, safety, and quality of life.

Researchers are investigating new treatment options for meningiomas that continue to grow despite local therapies like surgery or radiotherapy. This trial focuses on evaluating a precision medicine approach that combines PET-based imaging to select patients with tumors expressing somatostatin receptors and a targeted radioligand therapy called 177Lu-DOTATATE. This is the first randomized clinical trial studying this therapy in patients with meningiomas that have not responded to other treatments. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives 177Lu-DOTATATE through intravenous infusions every four weeks for a total of four cycles. The other group receives local standard care, which may include treatments like hydroxyurea, bevacizumab, sunitinib, octreotide, everolimus, or observation with supportive care, based on the investigators choice. This study is designed to compare the effects of 177Lu-DOTATATE against various standard treatments in this patient population. During the study, participants will undergo regular MRI scans to measure tumor size and progression. Researchers will also assess overall survival, neurological function, quality of life, and treatment side effects over a period extending up to two years after enrollment. Monitoring includes imaging, laboratory tests, and health questionnaires to evaluate how the disease and treatments affect participants over time.

Researchers are investigating a new therapy called arfolitixorin for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer mCRC who are eligible for first-line treatment. This Phase 1b2 study aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of arfolitixorin when given in place of leucovorin, a standard therapy component, in combination with other chemotherapy drugs. The study compares different doses of arfolitixorin to determine the maximum tolerated dose and optimal administration duration while assessing its potential advantages over the current standard treatment. Participants will receive arfolitixorin or leucovorin as part of chemotherapy regimens including fluorouracil, oxaliplatin or irinotecan, and antibody treatments such as bevacizumab, cetuximab, or panitumumab. Treatment is administered via intravenous infusions every two weeks. The study has two parts the first identifies the maximum tolerated dose of arfolitixorin through dose escalation, and the second randomly assigns patients to two arfolitixorin dose groups or a standard treatment group to evaluate safety and anti-tumor effects. Throughout the trial, patients undergo imaging scans such as CT or MRI to monitor tumor response and disease progression at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Physical exams, blood and urine tests, and side effect assessments are conducted regularly. After treatment ends, participants have an end-of-treatment visit and are followed up every 90 days to track survival, subsequent treatments, and any ongoing adverse events, with total follow-up lasting up to 24 months.

This trial evaluates the effectiveness of adjuvant cemiplimab immunotherapy in adults with surgically removed stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC who have not previously received adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. The study aims to compare disease-free survival between patients treated with cemiplimab and those under observation without additional treatment, focusing on patients with tumors showing PD-L1 expression of 1% or higher. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either cemiplimab or observation. Those in the cemiplimab group receive 350 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by 700 mg every 6 weeks for up to 6 cycles or until disease relapse or unacceptable side effects occur. The observation group does not receive adjuvant treatment. Treatment continues until relapse, toxicity, or completion of planned cycles. During the trial, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging and laboratory tests to monitor disease status and side effects. The main outcome measured is disease-free survival, tracked for approximately 59 months from randomization. Secondary outcomes include overall survival and the nature and severity of adverse events. Participants are monitored for safety and treatment response throughout the study period, which is expected to conclude in March 2029.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, effectiveness, optimal dose, and behavior of an investigational drug called BNT326, alone or combined with other immunotherapy agents, in adults with advanced solid tumors. This study includes patients with tumors that have either spread metastatic, returned after treatment, or progressed despite previous therapies, across various cancer types such as melanoma, lung cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and cervical cancer. Participants are divided into two parts Part 1 tests BNT326 alone in different tumor-specific groups, some with dose randomization to find optimal dosing. Part 2 evaluates BNT326 alone or combined with another investigational drug called pumitamig in several cancer types, with some groups receiving randomized doses and others non-randomized treatments. Treatments are given via intravenous infusion, with some oral medications combined in Part 1. The study includes dose escalation and randomization phases, and treatment can continue for up to 24 months or until disease progression or other reasons. During the study, participants undergo screening, treatment, safety follow-up, efficacy follow-up, and long-term survival monitoring phases. Researchers assess adverse events, treatment responses, disease progression, and drug behavior in the body using clinical evaluations and laboratory tests. Follow-up assessments occur up to approximately 38 months for Part 1 and 48 months for Part 2, with continued treatment possible for those benefiting from the therapy. The study aims to gather comprehensive data on safety, dosing, and effectiveness in this patient population.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, and therapeutic effects of BNT113 combined with pembrolizumab compared to pembrolizumab alone as a first-line treatment for patients with unresectable recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma HNSCC positive for human papilloma virus 16 HPV16 and expressing the protein PD-L1 with a combined positive score of 1 or higher. This is an open-label, multi-site, Phase IIIII clinical trial consisting of two parts an initial safety run-in phase and a randomized phase. In the safety run-in phase Part A, patients receive BNT113 in combination with pembrolizumab to confirm safety and tolerability at selected dose levels. The randomized phase Part B compares BNT113 combined with pembrolizumab against pembrolizumab monotherapy. Treatments are given by intravenous injection or infusion and continue for up to 24 months. An optional pre-screening phase allows tumor samples to be tested for HPV16 DNA and PD-L1 expression before the main trial screening. Participants will be closely monitored throughout the study. Assessments include safety evaluations, tumor response, and survival outcomes such as overall survival and progression-free survival. Tumor tissue samples must be provided for testing. Researchers will measure treatment-emergent adverse events, response rates, duration of response, and disease control. The study may last up to 48 months, with ongoing safety and efficacy monitoring during and after treatment.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of trontinemab in people with early symptomatic Alzheimers disease, ranging from mild cognitive impairment to mild dementia due to Alzheimers. This Phase III trial aims to understand how trontinemab affects cognitive decline and disease progression in this population. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either intravenous trontinemab or a placebo in a parallel-group design. Treatment is administered by IV infusion, and the effects are compared over a period of 72 weeks. The study includes comprehensive safety and efficacy assessments throughout this period. During the 72 weeks of the study, participants will undergo various evaluations including cognitive tests such as the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes CDR-SB, Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scales, brain imaging with PET and MRI scans, and biomarker measurements in cerebrospinal fluid and blood. Safety monitoring includes tracking adverse events, infusion reactions, and antibody development. The study requires participants to have a study partner and to complete all study procedures over this time.

Researchers are studying the safety and effects of VHB937 in people with early Alzheimers disease, including those with Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimers or mild Alzheimers itself. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II trial aims to evaluate whether VHB937 can benefit memory, thinking abilities, daily functioning, and brain changes. The study also looks at how the body processes VHB937 and responds to it. Participants receive intravenous infusions of either a low dose or high dose of VHB937, or a placebo, over a 72-week double-blind period. After this, an extension phase follows for further observation. The treatments are given through infusions, and participants are randomly assigned to one of the three groups in parallel. Throughout the study, participants and their study partners attend regular visits for assessments including clinical dementia rating scales, cognitive tests, daily living activities evaluation, and brain imaging biomarkers. Safety is monitored by tracking adverse events and serious adverse events. Blood samples are collected to measure VHB937 levels and immune responses. The total study duration includes the 72-week treatment period plus additional time in the extension phase.

Researchers are comparing two psychotherapy programs, the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy CBASP and Behavioral Activation BA, in adults with persistent depressive disorder PDD who have not responded well to previous treatments. This study focuses on hospitalized patients with treatment-resistant depression and aims to evaluate which therapy is more effective in reducing depressive symptoms over 16 weeks. The study also explores factors that affect treatment response and the long-term effects of these therapies. Participants will receive either CBASP or BA treatment during a 10-week acute phase consisting of inpatient or dayclinic therapy followed by a 6-week outpatient continuation phase with group therapy. Both therapies include individual and group sessions, nurse contacts, and exercise therapy during inpatient treatment. All patients will also receive optimized antidepressant medication according to standard guidelines, with adjustments if needed based on response. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments using various depression rating scales, symptom inventories, and quality of life questionnaires from baseline through 64 weeks after treatment start. Researchers will monitor responses, remission, relapse rates, and cost-effectiveness of the treatments. The total study duration includes acute treatment, continuation therapy, and long-term follow-up to evaluate sustained outcomes and health economic impacts.