Mountain View

Researchers are investigating new treatment options for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD), a condition affecting the eyes. Standard treatments like aflibercept do not work for everyone, so this trial is studying a medicine called tiespectus (also known as MK-8748 or EYE201) to see if it can effectively treat NVAMD. This is a pivotal Phase 2/3 randomized, double-masked, multicenter study comparing tiespectus to aflibercept. Participants will receive treatment by intravitreal injection directly into the eye. The study has three groups: one receiving tiespectus, another receiving aflibercept (2 mg), and possibly a third comparator group as part of the design. The study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of these treatments in people newly diagnosed with NVAMD. During the study, participants will be monitored for changes in their best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using standard eye charts from the start of the study to one year later. Researchers will perform regular eye exams and safety assessments to track treatment effects. Participation involves follow-up visits over at least one year to evaluate vision changes and treatment safety in detail.

Researchers are evaluating intravitreal EYE103 in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD) or macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). This Phase 2, randomized, dose-masked study includes four patient cohorts: treatment-naive NVAMD participants, incomplete responder (IR) NVAMD participants as monotherapy, IR NVAMD participants receiving EYE103 combined with aflibercept 2.0 mg, and treatment-naive BRVO participants. The study aims to assess safety and efficacy of different doses of EYE103 in these conditions. Participants in each cohort will be randomly assigned to receive either a low or high dose of EYE103 via intravitreal injection. All participants will receive three injections spaced four weeks apart. IR NVAMD participants in the combination therapy cohort will also receive an injection of aflibercept 2.0 mg on Day 1. The timing of enrollment into each cohort is determined by the Sponsor. Participants will undergo safety and efficacy assessments at each injection visit, with some cohorts returning two weeks after injections for further evaluations. Assessments include measuring best-corrected visual acuity using the ETDRS chart, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundoscopy, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) to measure central subfield thickness. The study concludes at Week 12, which is the end-of-study visit for all participants.

Researchers are observing the short-term progression of geographic atrophy (GA) caused by age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in people aged 55 years and older. This multi-center, non-interventional study aims to identify participants with progressive GA to better understand the structural and functional changes of GA and explore connections with genetic or lifestyle factors. The study does not involve any treatment but focuses on monitoring disease progression over time. Participants with bilateral GA secondary to AMD will be observed without intervention. GA lesion size must be between 1.25 mm2 and 17.5 mm2 in at least one eye, confirmed by specialized imaging. Visual acuity and retinal sensitivity will be measured to ensure adequate vision for navigation. No treatments are administered, and the study collects data through imaging and vision tests at baseline and follow-up visits. During the study, participants will undergo assessments including visual acuity testing, microperimetry for retinal sensitivity, and imaging scans such as fundus autofluorescence and optical coherence tomography. Researchers will track the progression of GA at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months to evaluate changes. Participants must provide informed consent and be able to complete all assessments. Safety and eligibility will be monitored throughout the study duration.

Researchers are studying the effects of two experimental drugs, pozelimab and cemdisiran, in adults aged 50 to 85 who have Geographic Atrophy (GA) caused by Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD), a condition that affects central vision. The study aims to compare how quickly GA progresses in patients treated with cemdisiran alone, a combination of pozelimab and cemdisiran, or a placebo. Additional goals include monitoring possible side effects, measuring drug levels in the blood, and checking for antibodies that might reduce drug effectiveness or cause side effects. Participants receive subcutaneous injections of either pozelimab combined with cemdisiran, cemdisiran alone, or a placebo. The study is randomized, double-masked, and placebo-controlled, conducted at multiple centers. Treatment schedules and dosing are managed as described in the protocol, with vaccinations for meningococcal and pneumococcal infections required prior to participation. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular clinic visits where eye imaging using Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) tracks the progression of GA lesion area over 52 weeks. Researchers also monitor safety, side effects, and immune responses, ensuring adherence to study procedures. The main outcome measured is the growth rate of the GA lesion area over one year, helping to evaluate the potential benefits and risks of the study drugs.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the Port Delivery System (PDS) with ranibizumab compared to standard intravitreal ranibizumab injections in adults with diabetic macular edema (DME). This Phase III, multicenter, randomized study aims to compare PDS treatment every 24 weeks with injections every 4 weeks. A substudy will assess the safety of re-implanting the updated PDS and performing refill-exchange procedures in participants previously enrolled in the main study. Participants will receive either the PDS implant pre-filled with ranibizumab or intravitreal ranibizumab injections according to their assigned group. Treatments will be administered on a set schedule specific to each arm. The substudy involves re-implantation of the updated PDS and monitoring post-procedure. The PDS refill exchange is also part of the treatment plan for some participants. Throughout the study, participants will undergo assessments including vision tests using the ETDRS chart to measure changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Safety will be monitored by tracking ocular and systemic adverse events, device-related effects, and any serious complications up to 72 weeks after treatment or re-implantation. The study evaluates both short-term and long-term safety and efficacy outcomes over the full duration of participation.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, as maintenance therapy following surgery and chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer that has been surgically removed and who have a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 genes. This phase II randomized, double-blind study aims to determine if olaparib can improve relapse-free survival compared to placebo in these patients, who have completed perioperative chemotherapy and have no evidence of recurrent disease. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either olaparib or a placebo orally twice daily in 28-day cycles for up to 12 cycles, as long as there is no disease progression or unacceptable side effects. Throughout the treatment period, patients undergo imaging tests such as CT scans or MRI and blood sample collections. After completing the treatment cycles, patients are followed up at 30 days, every 4 months for the first year, and then every 6 months for up to 10 years after randomization to monitor their health and disease status. During the study, researchers assess relapse-free survival by documenting any return of cancer or death from 22 to 44 months after randomization. They also collect blood samples and perform imaging tests to monitor the disease and evaluate treatment effects. Safety is carefully monitored, and patients must have recovered from previous treatments before starting the study. The study includes long-term follow-up to observe survival outcomes and any differences based on genetic mutations or prior chemotherapy regimens.

Researchers are evaluating sleep and wake-promoting methods to help people fall asleep faster, stay asleep during naps, and maintain alertness while awake. This study involves healthy adults aged 18 to 60 and tests how pink noise during sleep and blue-enriched lighting combined with naps affect sleep quality and alertness. The study aims to measure improvements in sleep onset, duration, depth, and daytime alertness using various performance and sleep tests. Participants will attend two laboratory visits at least one week apart after maintaining a regular sleep schedule at home for 2-3 weeks with at least 8.5 hours in bed nightly. During the visits, participants will be exposed to different conditions: sleep promoting with pink noise, wake promoting with blue-enriched light plus a nap, a combination of both, or placebo conditions. The order and combination of these interventions will be randomized for each participant. During each lab visit, participants will undergo extensive testing including brain wave monitoring with EEG, subjective sleepiness scales, reaction time tests, mood assessments, and saliva sampling for melatonin to track circadian rhythms. They will be monitored continuously, provided meals, and supported through the study. Safety measures include toxicology screening and vital signs monitoring. The total lab stay is about 25 hours per visit, and participants are advised to avoid driving afterward due to sleep deprivation effects.

Inpatient falls cause serious physical harm and increase healthcare costs, affecting both patients and hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) classify falls with injury as "never events," meaning they are preventable errors that negatively impact hospital safety ratings and reimbursement. Despite evidence showing that fall prevention alarms are not effective, these alarms are still widely used in hospitals. This study aims to reduce the use of these alarms by applying tailored strategies based on education, audit and feedback, and opinion leaders, guided by the Choosing Wisely De-implementation Framework. It will compare different coaching intensities to find effective ways to reduce alarm use in hospital units. The study involves 30 medical or medical-surgical hospital units across the US. These units will be randomly assigned to receive either high-intensity or low-intensity coaching to implement the tailored strategies for reducing fall prevention alarm use. Coaches will train hospital staff in quality improvement and fall prevention practices, customizing their support to each site's needs. This approach may help future efforts to reduce low-value alarm use in other healthcare settings with high fall risks. Participants include stakeholders involved in fall prevention at the participating hospitals. The study will monitor the prevalence of fall prevention alarms and record patient falls monthly over 30 months. Researchers will assess how well the coaching strategies reduce alarm use and improve patient safety. The findings will inform best practices for de-implementing ineffective alarms and may guide broader quality improvement initiatives in healthcare.

Researchers are evaluating ivonescimab as a first-line treatment option for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors show high PD-L1 expression. This phase 3 randomized, double-blinded study compares ivonescimab with pembrolizumab to assess overall survival and progression-free survival in this patient group. Participants will receive either ivonescimab or pembrolizumab as intravenous injections. The study is designed to monitor these treatments over time to determine which may provide better outcomes in controlling metastatic NSCLC in patients with high PD-L1 levels. The study includes patients with measurable non-brain lesions and no prior systemic treatment for metastatic NSCLC. During the trial, patients will be closely followed for up to approximately 36 months to measure overall survival and progression-free survival. Researchers will assess the safety and effectiveness of the treatments through regular evaluations, including monitoring for disease progression and survival status. This long-term follow-up ensures comprehensive understanding of treatment impact over time.

Researchers are evaluating how to best recommend chemotherapy for patients with colon cancer after surgery by using the presence or absence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the blood. This approach aims to identify microscopic residual tumor cells and may provide better risk prediction for cancer recurrence compared to traditional methods. The trial focuses on patients with Stage IIB, IIC, or III colon cancer who have undergone complete tumor removal. Participants will have their tumor tissue and blood tested centrally using the Signatera assay to determine ctDNA status. Patients without detectable ctDNA may avoid chemotherapy, while those with detectable ctDNA are considered at higher risk and will be randomly assigned to receive different chemotherapy regimens, including mFOLFOX6, CAPOX, or mFOLFIRINOX, given intravenously or orally over periods ranging from 3 to 6 months. The study includes initial screening, treatment, and possible second randomization for patients whose ctDNA status changes during monitoring. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including blood tests, imaging scans, and performance evaluations to monitor their health and response to therapy. Researchers will track the time to ctDNA positivity and disease-free survival for up to 3 and 5 years, respectively. Safety and treatment effects will be closely observed throughout the study duration, ensuring thorough follow-up and monitoring for all participants.