Wausau

Researchers are studying the safety and effectiveness of intravitreal KSI-101 injections in adults with macular edema caused by inflammation, called Macular Edema Secondary to Inflammation MESI. This Phase 3 clinical trial aims to evaluate how well KSI-101 works compared to a sham injection in improving vision for people with this condition. Participants will receive one of three treatments KSI-101 at 5 mg or 10 mg doses injected into the eye every 4 weeks for six months, followed by dosing tailored to individual needs, or a sham injection following the same schedule. The study is randomized, double-masked, and controlled to ensure unbiased results. During the trial, participants will undergo vision tests to measure changes in best-corrected visual acuity BCVA over 24 weeks. Researchers will monitor safety and treatment effects throughout the study. The trial is expected to run until November 2027, with participants receiving regular assessments and follow-ups to track their eye health and response to treatment.

Researchers are conducting a Phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of intravitreal KSI-101 in adults with macular edema caused by inflammation, known as Macular Edema Secondary to Inflammation MESI. The study aims to understand how well this treatment works compared to a sham injection in improving vision and reducing eye swelling related to this condition. Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of three treatments an intravitreal injection of KSI-101 at either 5 mg or 10 mg doses once every four weeks for six months, followed by personalized dosing schedules, or a sham injection on the same schedule. The injections are given directly into the eye, and the study is double-masked to ensure unbiased results. During the study, participants will undergo regular eye exams to measure visual acuity and eye thickness using specialized imaging. The main outcome is the change in best corrected visual acuity at 24 weeks. Researchers will also monitor the proportion of participants who show improvement in vision over this period. The trial includes safety assessments and will continue until August 2027, with detailed monitoring throughout the treatment and follow-up phases.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of a new medicine called NNC0487-0111 in people who have Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction HFpEF or Heart Failure with mildly reduced Ejection Fraction HFmrEF and excess body weight. This phase 3 clinical trial aims to find out if NNC0487-0111 is safe and effective for treating these conditions compared to a placebo. Participants have HFpEF or HFmrEF and a body mass index of 30 or above. The study is sponsored by Novo Nordisk AS and uses a randomized, quadruple-masked design. Participants will receive either NNC0487-0111 or a matching placebo by injection under the skin once a week. The NNC0487-0111 is given in increasing doses over time. The study is parallel in design, meaning participants are randomly assigned to one of the two groups and receive that treatment throughout the trial. This treatment period extends for up to about 165 weeks. The study evaluates the time to certain heart failure events, hospitalizations, cardiovascular deaths, and other major cardiovascular events. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess heart failure outcomes and kidney function, as well as quality of life using questionnaires like the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Safety and effectiveness are assessed through hospital visits, heart failure event tracking, and blood tests including kidney function and blood sugar levels. The total participation spans over three years, with ongoing evaluations to measure the time to heart failure events and cardiovascular outcomes. Participants receive close medical monitoring throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with BRAF-V600 mutant melanoma that has spread to the brain. This phase II trial compares two combinations encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab versus ipilimumab and nivolumab. The study aims to determine which approach is more effective at shrinking and controlling brain metastases, and it also examines survival, response rates, and treatment safety. Patients are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group takes encorafenib daily by mouth, binimetinib twice daily by mouth, and receives nivolumab through an intravenous IV infusion every 28 days. The other group receives nivolumab IV every cycle and ipilimumab IV over 30 minutes during the first four cycles, with cycles repeating every 21 days initially, then every 28 days. Treatment continues unless disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. Participants undergo brain MRI scans before enrollment and throughout the study to assess tumor response using specific criteria. After completing treatment, patients are followed every six months for two years, then yearly up to three years. The study collects tissue, blood, spinal fluid, and stool samples for future research. Researchers monitor progression-free survival as the main outcome, along with overall survival, response rates, and treatment side effects.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of nivolumab to the usual treatment of paclitaxel and ramucirumab compared to paclitaxel and ramucirumab alone in patients with advanced stomach or esophageal adenocarcinoma. This phase IIIII trial aims to see if nivolumab improves progression-free survival and overall survival in these patients. Nivolumab is an immunotherapy monoclonal antibody that may help the immune system attack cancer, while ramucirumab may prevent tumor blood vessel growth, and paclitaxel stops cancer cells from dividing. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives nivolumab intravenously on day 1 of each 28-day cycle, combined with ramucirumab on days 1 and 15, and paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15. The other group receives only ramucirumab and paclitaxel on the same schedule without nivolumab. Treatment cycles continue unless the disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. During the study, patients undergo CT scans and MRI imaging, and may optionally provide blood samples. Throughout the trial, participants are monitored with regular imaging and optional blood tests. After treatment ends, patients have follow-up visits at 30, 60, and 90 days, then every six months for up to three years. Researchers assess progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, disease control, safety, and quality of life using questionnaires and patient-reported symptoms. This comprehensive monitoring helps evaluate treatment effects and patient well-being over time.

Researchers are studying adults newly diagnosed with breast, colorectal, melanoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or non-small cell lung cancer who are planning to receive systemic cancer therapies such as chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors ICIs. The study aims to understand how cannabis and cannabinoid use relates to cancer-related symptoms over one year. This observational research includes patients treated in community oncology clinics and is sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Participants complete surveys and allow medical record reviews throughout the study. The study tracks cannabis and cannabinoid use as well as perceived benefits, harms, and adverse effects monthly for 12 months following enrollment. An optional sub-study is available at select sites for patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving specific chemotherapy with ICIs. During the study, participants fill out monthly surveys about their symptoms and cannabis use. Researchers also review medical records to assess cancer-related symptoms and treatment progress. The main measure is cancer-related symptoms assessed monthly for up to one year. Secondary measures include cannabis use patterns and adverse effects. Participation involves ongoing survey completion and record review, with the total study duration lasting 12 months post-enrollment.

Post Operative Atrial Fibrillation POAF is a frequent complication after cardiac surgery, affecting over half of patients depending on their baseline health and surgery type. This trial aims to evaluate if adding prophylactic ablation and exclusion of the Left Atrial Appendage during routine cardiac surgery can reduce the occurrence of POAF and clinical atrial fibrillation in patients aged 65 and older who are at risk but have not yet developed AF. Participants will undergo either the standard cardiac surgery alone or cardiac surgery combined with the Isolator Synergy EnCompass Ablation System and AtriClip Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion System. The ablation and exclusion procedures are performed at the time of the planned cardiac surgery. This study uses a randomized design to compare these two approaches in preventing AF after surgery. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for safety and effectiveness outcomes within 30 days following surgery, focusing on the incidence of atrial fibrillation and any complications. A longer-term follow-up extending up to three years will assess sustained effectiveness. The total study duration extends through to 2029, with scheduled evaluations to track the participants heart rhythm status and overall health after their cardiac surgery.

Researchers are conducting a phase 3 randomized, double-masked study to compare the effects of EYP-1901 against Aflibercept in patients with diabetic macular edema DME, a condition related to diabetic retinopathy. The study aims to evaluate the treatments impact on vision improvement, with a focus on the average change in best-corrected visual acuity BCVA over one year. Participants are assigned to receive either EYP-1901 or Aflibercept, both delivered by intravitreal injection directly into the eye. The study uses a parallel group design with random allocation and masking to compare these two drug treatments. The primary measurement is taken at weeks 52 and 56, with secondary outcomes including the rate of injection burden by week 56. During the study, participants will undergo regular vision assessments using the ETDRS letter score. Researchers will monitor treatment effects and safety throughout the trial period, which extends until October 2028. The total participation time includes screening, treatment, and follow-up visits designed to evaluate vision changes and treatment needs over approximately one year.

This trial evaluates treatment approaches for patients with locally advanced nasal and paranasal sinus squamous cell carcinoma that can be removed by surgery. It compares chemotherapy given before surgery and radiation therapy to surgery and radiation therapy alone. The study aims to assess organ preservation rates, overall survival, and progression-free survival, along with the accuracy of imaging predictions and the effects of tobacco use on treatment outcomes and patient symptoms. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group undergoes standard surgery followed by image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy IMRT and may receive cisplatin or carboplatin chemotherapy during radiation if certain risk factors are present. The other group receives up to three courses of chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin or carboplatin before surgery, followed by the same radiation and chemotherapy approach. Chemotherapy is administered intravenously, and radiation is given daily for 30 treatments over several weeks. During the study, participants have imaging scans such as MRI and PETCT before and after chemotherapy to evaluate tumor status and organ preservation. After treatment, patients are monitored with follow-up visits every three months for up to two years, then every six months up to five years. The research team collects laboratory tests, questionnaires, and clinical assessments to measure survival outcomes, organ preservation, treatment side effects, and patient-reported symptoms throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for older adults aged 70 and above with advanced stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer that expresses PD-L1 in 1-49% of tumor cells. This phase III trial compares the effects of adding chemotherapy to immunotherapy with pembrolizumab against pembrolizumab alone. The study aims to assess improvements in overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, toxicity, quality of life, and explore geriatric assessment factors and gut microbiome correlations. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. Arm A receives pembrolizumab intravenously every 21 days for four cycles, followed by maintenance pembrolizumab every 21 or 42 days for up to two years. Arm B receives the same pembrolizumab schedule plus one of several chemotherapy regimens, including combinations of pemetrexed, carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel, or paclitaxel administered intravenously on different schedules for four cycles, followed by pembrolizumab maintenance. Imaging with MRI, CT, and PET scans is performed at baseline and throughout the trial. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to monitor disease status, blood tests, and quality of life questionnaires. After treatment completion, follow-up visits occur every three months for up to two years and then every six months up to five years. Researchers measure overall survival as the primary outcome and also track progression-free survival, response rates, adverse events, and patient-reported quality of life. Safety and tolerability are closely monitored along with exploratory analyses of chemotherapy dose intensity and microbiome factors.