Validation of visual analogue scales to assess occupational stress compared to the Karasek questionnaire: A cross sectional study.
Maëlys Clinchamps, Bruno Pereira, Martial Mermillod...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41666222Actively Recruiting
Led by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand · Updated on 2024-08-06
120
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
52 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are evaluating the use of Visual Analog Scales (EVAs) to measure satisfaction and well-being at work, addressing psychosocial risks like workload, autonomy, burnout, anxiety, effort-reward balance, and work addiction. Current questionnaires used to assess these risks can be very long and complex, leading to low response rates and inconsistent answers. This study aims to validate shorter, quicker, and more uniform scales that provide precise and continuous data for better analysis. Participants in this observational study will complete EVAs designed to assess various psychosocial factors at work, including burnout, anxiety, job demand, job control, social support, effort-reward imbalance, work addiction, and life satisfaction. These measurements will be taken at inclusion and one week later. Sociodemographic, occupational, and lifestyle data such as work hours, alcohol and tobacco use, physical activity, stress levels, and sleep quality will also be collected once at inclusion. During the study, participants will complete questionnaires and scales that evaluate their psychosocial work environment and related health factors. Researchers will monitor changes in burnout, anxiety, work demands, and support over one week to validate the new scales. The total participation involves completing assessments at two time points, helping to better understand occupational stress and well-being using these new measurement tools.
CONDITIONS
Validation of Visual Analog Scales to Measure SatisfactiOn and WELL-being at Work (SoWell-VAS)
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person or remote)
Duration - 1 day
Participants provide baseline information on work-related well-being and other health and lifestyle factors.
1 visit (in-person or remote) at inclusion
Duration - 1 week
Participants complete follow-up assessments to measure changes in well-being one week after inclusion.
1 follow-up visit (in-person or remote) approximately one week after inclusion
Total: 1 location
1
CHU clermont-ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Actively Recruiting
L
Lise Laclautre
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Masking
N/A
Allocation
N/A
Model
N/A
Primary Purpose
N/A
Number of Arms
0
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Maëlys Clinchamps, Bruno Pereira, Martial Mermillod...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41666222