Consumption Of Specific Foods And Beverages And Excess Weight Gain Among Children And Adolescents.
Di Dong, Marcel Bilger, Rob M van Dam...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26526253/Actively Recruiting
Led by University of Pennsylvania · Updated on 2026-05-18
300
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
N/A
Total Duration
Unhealthy diets contribute significantly to preventable chronic diseases like type 2 diabetes, obesity, heart disease, and stroke, especially affecting racialethnic minorities and those with lower income. This research aims to understand how a combination of healthy food policies targeting ultra-processed foods in online retail settings can improve nutrition and reduce diet-related diseases. Participants will use an innovative online grocery store and restaurant platform, randomly assigned to either a control group with no interventions or an intervention group where a suite of healthy food policies is applied. These policies include taxes on ultra-processed foods and beverages, front-of-pack nutrition warning labels, and healthy checkout regulations limiting promotion of unhealthy items. The study lasts six weeks, starting with a baseline week without interventions, followed by three weeks with the policies applied, then two weeks introducing unhealthy food marketing to mimic industry responses. Participants will shop once weekly on the platforms, receiving purchased foods via delivery. They will complete surveys at baseline and after six weeks, plus four dietary recalls over the phone during baseline and intervention periods. Researchers will measure changes in calories purchased from unhealthy foods, dietary quality, and the impact of unhealthy food marketing on policy effects. The study includes monitoring food purchases, nutrient intake, perceptions of products and policies, and participant opinions over the full six-week period.
CONDITIONS
Click & Pick Study
J
Julianna Catania, MPH
E
Eva Fabian, MPH
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
University of Pennsylvania
Lead Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Suite of healthy food policies | No intervention control | Guideline-supported healthy eating advice |
|---|---|---|---|
| What is it? | Healthy food policies (such as ultra-processed food taxes, clear nutrition labeling, and healthy checkout regulations) are applied to an online restaurant and grocery store to influence what participants purchase. | Participants order foods from the online store without any policy changes or healthy food regulations, experiencing the standard online ordering process. | Healthy eating guidance based on dietary guidelines for adults at risk of chronic disease, as typically recommended in clinical practice and public health programs. |
| Role in the study | Tested as the main behavioral intervention to evaluate potential effects on food purchasing behavior. | Serves as the randomized control for comparison with the food policy intervention. | Represents the healthy eating advice that adults would typically receive from clinicians or public health specialists outside of the trial. |
| Primary use | To test whether policies such as food taxes, labeling, and healthy checkout regulations can reduce purchases of unhealthy ultra-processed foods and improve diet quality. | To serve as baseline comparator for assessing effects of the healthy food policy intervention. | Promotes balanced eating patterns and reduced consumption of ultra-processed foods; aims to prevent obesity and reduce risk factors for chronic disease. |
| How is it performed? | Policies are embedded in the online interface for food ordering: taxes applied to unhealthy foods, nutrition labels visible, restrictions on promotions at checkout. | Standard online ordering platform, with no special policies or labels applied. | Healthy eating advice is usually delivered in primary care, community health, or through public health communications, not in real-time food ordering. |
| Evidence status | Experimental; registry reports ongoing recruitment. Prior studies show taxes, nutrition labeling, and checkout regulations can help reduce purchase and consumption of unhealthy foods in controlled settings. | No policies; observational studies link unrestricted access to unhealthy foods with higher calorie purchases and poorer diet quality. | Strong evidence from meta-analyses and guidelines supports healthy eating advice to improve diet quality and reduce risk of chronic disease over time. |
| Important limitations | Short-term trial in online settings; unclear if results will generalize to longer time frames or real-world restaurant/grocery environments. | Control reflects current online food environment; does not test the impact of structured health advice or policy changes. | Dietary advice is not embedded in real-time online food ordering and requires active engagement; effectiveness depends on reaching and motivating at-risk populations. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person or online)
Duration - 1 week
Participants shop once per week without any interventions to establish baseline purchasing behavior in an online grocery store and restaurant.
1 baseline shopping week
Duration - 3 weeks
Participants are randomized to either a control group with no policies or to a group experiencing a suite of healthy food policies including taxes, nutrition labeling, and checkout regulations while shopping once per week online.
Weekly shopping visits for 3 weeks
Duration - 2 weeks
Participants continue shopping once per week online with the healthy food policies in place, while unhealthy food marketing (such as banner ads) is introduced to simulate industry response.
Weekly shopping visits for 2 weeks
Duration - Up to 7 weeks including baseline and final assessments
Participants complete surveys at baseline and after 6 weeks, and complete dietary recalls during baseline and the fourth week to assess dietary intake and perceptions.
Surveys at baseline and Week 7; 4 dietary recall phone calls during Weeks 1 and 4
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
PREVENTION
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Di Dong, Marcel Bilger, Rob M van Dam...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26526253/Natasha Clarke, Emily Pechey, Daina Kosīte...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515697/Anna H Grummon, Marissa G Hall
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32433660/Tatiana Andreyeva, Keith Marple, Samantha Marinello...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35648398/Ruopeng An, Jianxiu Liu, Ruidong Liu...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33059917/US Burden of Disease Collaborators, Ali H Mokdad, Katherine Ballestros...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29634829/University of Pennsylvania
Lead Sponsor