Determining the Effective Dose of Epidural Bupivacaine for Labor Pain Relief
Using a Lidocaine Test Dose in Women Undergoing Labor
Led by Brigham and Women's Hospital · Updated on 2026-07-13
120
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
N/A
Total Duration
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
Researchers are evaluating the dose of bupivacaine needed to provide effective comfort in 90% of women undergoing labor induction or augmentation using epidural techniques. The study focuses on women who have received a lidocaine test dose and aims to determine the optimal bupivacaine dose for two epidural methods the Dural Puncture Epidural DPE technique and the Conventional Epidural EPL technique. This is a randomized, phase 4 trial to improve pain relief during labor.
Participants are assigned to one of two groups those receiving the DPE technique or those receiving the EPL technique, both following a lidocaine test dose. Each group receives bupivacaine 0.25% diluted to 20 mL. The first participant in each group receives 25 mg of bupivacaine, with later doses adjusted in 2.5 mg increments based on the previous participants pain relief, aiming to find the dose that achieves a pain score less than 3 on the Numerical Rating Scale NRS within 30 minutes.
During the study, participants will be monitored for pain relief effectiveness using the verbal Numerical Pain Rating Scale at 30 minutes after bupivacaine administration. Researchers will track the dose needed to achieve effective comfort in most participants. The study includes women aged 18 to 50 who are in early labor with a pain score of at least 5, and assessments will be made during labor analgesia initiation. The total participation lasts through labor analgesia initiation and dose adjustments as per study protocol.
CONDITIONS
Brief Title
ED90 of Epidural Bupivacaine With Lidocaine for the Initiation of Labor Analgesia
Research Team
L
Lawrence C Tsen, MD
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match. Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
Factors
Dural Puncture Epidural Technique
Standard Epidural Technique
What it is
A technique where the epidural space is accessed through a dural puncture, followed by administration of bupivacaine and lidocaine to achieve labor analgesia.
Traditional epidural technique using bupivacaine and lidocaine delivered through standard epidural placement for labor pain relief.
Role in study
Assigned as the investigational intervention arm evaluating potential improvement in analgesia quality.
Serves as the active comparator, representing established labor analgesia practice.
Primary use
Used for rapid and effective pain control during early active labor for eligible women.
Used for established labor pain relief in women requesting epidural analgesia.
How it is given or performed
Epidural space accessed with dural puncture; bupivacaine and lidocaine are administered for pain relief.
Standard epidural placement followed by injection of bupivacaine and lidocaine for analgesia.
Evidence status
Ongoing clinical trial investigating effectiveness for labor pain. Prior published studies suggest improved analgesia quality and fewer side effects compared to standard epidural, but findings require further confirmation.
Well-established technique for labor pain relief; multiple studies confirm effectiveness and safety.
Important limitations
Ongoing study results are not yet available. Prior studies note that the technique may have unique risks, such as higher rate of post-dural puncture headache or technical difficulty, and external evidence is still limited to small to moderate studies.
Although it is broadly effective and safe, epidural technique can occasionally result in incomplete analgesia, procedural risks, or complications such as hypotension or nerve block.
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
Who Can Participate
Age: 18Years - 50Years
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
Parturient with no major co-morbidities
Singleton, vertex gestation at term (37-42 weeks)
Less than or equal to 5 cm dilation
Desire to receive epidural labor analgesia
Numerical Rating Scale greater or equal to 5 (NRS 0-10), at time of epidural labor analgesia request
You will not qualify if you...
Current or historical evidence of clinically significant disease or condition, including diseases of pregnancy such as preeclampsia or gestational diabetes
Any contraindication to the administration of an epidural technique
History of hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to an amide local anesthetic agent
Current or historical evidence of a disease which may increase the risk of cesarean delivery, except trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC)
Evidence of anticipated fetal anomalies
Your Study Journey
Screening
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Treatment
Duration - During labor analgesia initiation
Participants receive bupivacaine via one of two epidural techniques after a lidocaine test dose. The initial dose is 25 mg, adjusted in increments of 2.5 mg based on pain relief response aiming to achieve comfort within 30 minutes.
Visits as needed during labor
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
TRIPLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Similar Trials
Study Comparing Combined Adductor Canal and IPACK Blocks to Adductor Canal Block Alone for Pain Relief After High Tibial, Distal Femoral, or Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy in Adults
Comparing Tramadol, Paracetamol, and Placebo for Pain Relief and Labor Outcomes in First-Time Mothers During Active Labor
Comparing Pain Relief by Blocking Vastus Lateralis Nerve or Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve After Knee Surgery
Study of Blood Flow Changes in Uterine and Umbilical Arteries Before and After Combined Spinal-Epidural Pain Relief in Laboring Women
Study Comparing Two Pain Scales to Guide Rescue Pain Medication After Surgery Using Morphine PCA
Effect of Combined Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Adductor Canal Block on Pain Relief After Knee Replacement Surgery
Study of Combined Ketorolac and Lidocaine Paracervical Block to Reduce Pain During Office Hysteroscopy in Adult Women
Randomized Trial Comparing Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus and Continuous Epidural Infusion With Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Labor Pain Relief
Comparing IV Analgesia, Thoracic Epidural Analgesia, and Erector Spinae Plane Block
for Chronic Pain After Open Heart Surgery in Adults
Study Comparing Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Plane Blocks Versus Local Wound Infiltration for Pain Relief After Minimally Invasive Heart Surgery
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Published Research Related To This Trial
A randomized sequential allocation study to determine the minimum effective analgesic concentration of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in patients receiving epidural analgesia for labor.
Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Improves Labor Analgesia Quality With Fewer Side Effects Compared With Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial.