Comparing Computer-Assisted vs Conventional Surgery for Total Knee Replacement in Patients 45 and Older

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are evaluating two surgical methods for patients needing total knee replacement surgery. The study compares the standard conventional technique with a newer computer-assisted navigation technique. The goal is to assess differences in clinical and functional outcomes, surgical bleeding, and healthcare costs such as surgery duration and hospital stay. This research involves 160 patients split evenly between the two surgery types. Participants will undergo either conventional total knee arthroplasty or computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using imageless computer guidance. The comparison includes monitoring both surgical processes and recovery. Patients are randomly assigned to one of the two groups, and the study is conducted with single masking. Throughout the study, participants will be evaluated using the Knee Society Score, WOMAC index, and pain scales from enrollment until 12 months after surgery. Secondary measures include surgical time, complications, blood loss, transfusions, and length of hospital stay. The study spans from enrollment through discharge and a 12-month follow-up period to assess outcomes and safety.

CAS vs Standard Technique in TKA: Comparison of Clinical and Functional Results