Actively Recruiting
How Do Individual Differences in Circadian Rhythms Influence Time Perception? A Randomized Crossover Study of Circadian Alignment Effects on Time Judgment and Cognition in Healthy Adults
Led by University of Aarhus · Updated on 2025-12-22
128
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
8 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
Researchers are studying how a person's natural daily rhythm, known as their chronotype, influences how they experience and judge time. This study focuses on healthy Danish-speaking adults aged 23 to 45 who identify clearly as either morning-type or evening-type. The goal is to see if time judgments and alertness differ when tested at a person's preferred time of day compared to a non-preferred time. The study also looks at how decision-making and social responses may change with circadian timing. Participants take part in two lab sessions on the same day in a crossover design: one session at their preferred time (e.g., morning for morning-types) and one at the opposite time. During each session, they complete computerized tasks measuring time estimation and production, vigilance through a psychomotor vigilance task, decision-making, responses to social information, and simple color-vision tests. Some participants will wear a wrist actigraphy device for one week before testing to track sleep-wake patterns. Throughout the study, participants complete short questionnaires about sleepiness, mood, fatigue, and their perception of time before, during, and after testing. Testing occurs under standardized lab conditions with scheduled breaks. Researchers measure outcomes such as time estimation bias, vigilance lapses, and decision-making metrics. Participants receive compensation after completing both sessions, and their data are handled securely. The entire participation takes place on one day, with results to be published regardless of outcome.
CONDITIONS
Brief Title
Circadian Timing and Time Perception in Healthy Adults
Who Can Participate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
- Aged 23 to 45 years
- Able to understand and communicate in Danish
- Completed at least upper secondary education (e.g., gymnasium)
- Categorized as either a Morning Type or Evening Type based on standardized chronotype assessments (MCTQ or MEQ)
You will not qualify if you...
- Currently working shifts, rotating schedules, or irregular sleep-wake timing
- Diagnosed with neurological, psychiatric, or sleep-related disorders
- Using medications that affect sleep, alertness, or circadian function
- Traveled across time zones within the last four weeks
- Classified as having an intermediate chronotype based on assessments
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Your Study Journey
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - 1 day
Participants complete two behavioral testing sessions on the same day, one at their preferred circadian time and one at the opposite time, with a substantial break between sessions. The study examines how timing relative to individual circadian rhythms affects time perception and cognition.
2 visits (morning and evening sessions on the same day)
Trial Site Locations
Total: 1 location
1
Cognition and Behavior Lab
Aarhus, Denmark, 8000
Actively Recruiting
Research Team
A
Ali Amidi, PhD
C
Cehao Yu, PhD
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
CROSSOVER
Primary Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Number of Arms
2
Similar Trials
Frequently Asked Questions
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here