Comparing Conventional Stainless Steel Crowns and the Hall Technique for Treating Cavities in Childrens Primary Molars

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are studying children with dental caries in their primary molars to compare two methods of treating tooth decay conventional stainless steel crown restorations and the Hall technique. The goal is to evaluate how effective each method is in managing carious primary molars. Stainless steel crowns have been shown to last longer than traditional fillings, and this study aims to assess these two approaches over time. The study involves two treatment groups. In one group, stainless steel crowns are placed after preparing the tooth, which includes caries removal and use of local anesthesia. In the other group, stainless steel crowns are placed using the Hall technique, which does not involve anesthesia, caries removal, or tooth preparation. Both procedures aim to restore decayed primary molars in children aged 3 to 9 years. Participants will be followed for up to 12 months, with evaluations at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to monitor crown failure rates. Researchers will also assess occlusal contact and periodontal health at these intervals. The study uses a randomized and double-blind design to compare outcomes. Children and their guardians will be monitored for treatment effectiveness and dental health throughout the study period, which is expected to end in May 2026.

Comparison of the Treatment Outcomes of the Conventional Stainless Steel Crown Restorations and the Hall Technique in the Treatment of Carious Primary Molars